Poll: Romney preferred over Obama to handle the economy

Raees wrote: I read a story that said the undecideds in this election are the smallest number ever. Most people have made up their mond on who to vote for, so spending all these millions of dollars on campaign ads is a waste of money.

It also means all the posturing on here is a waste of time. Nobody is changing anyone's mind.

Then we should be expecting you to stop posturing in what? 5,4,3,2...

Raees wrote: I read a story that said the undecideds in this election are the smallest number ever. Most people have made up their mond on who to vote for, so spending all these millions of dollars on campaign ads is a waste of money.

It also means all the posturing on here is a waste of time. Nobody is changing anyone's mind.

Then we should expect to see Romney win this election by about 2 to 1. Heh?

Dont count on it ...Obama still holds a slight lead in the popular vote polls and a larger lead in those that reflect the electoral college votes.

archer wrote: Dont count on it ...Obama still holds a slight lead in the popular vote polls and a larger lead in those that reflect the electoral college votes.

Then you're wasting your time posturing.

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

archer wrote: Dont count on it ...Obama still holds a slight lead in the popular vote polls and a larger lead in those that reflect the electoral college votes.

Then you're wasting your time posturing.

:rofl

I've spent very little time here "posturing", I wish I could say the same for you and your conservatives cronies.

archer wrote: Dont count on it ...Obama still holds a slight lead in the popular vote polls and a larger lead in those that reflect the electoral college votes.

He does hold a slight lead, which is a bad sign for him considering he had a substantial lead a few months ago and Romney is catching up. Add the fact that Obama has outspent Romney x4 last month with nothing to show for it. Maybe he's got an October surprise but I think he's shooting his wad early.

I found the story I was referring to about undecideds:

President Obama, Mitt Romney and a slew of outside groups will spend hundreds of millions of dollars over the next three and a half months trying to convince 1/16th of the American electorate to vote their way.

New polling from The Washington Post and ABC News shows there are fewer genuinely undecided voters during the 2012 election campaign than there have been in any of the last three elections.

And less than one in five voters says there is any chance at all that he or she will change his or her mind.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the ... _blog.html

Raees wrote: I found the story I was referring to about undecideds:

President Obama, Mitt Romney and a slew of outside groups will spend hundreds of millions of dollars over the next three and a half months trying to convince 1/16th of the American electorate to vote their way.

New polling from The Washington Post and ABC News shows there are fewer genuinely undecided voters during the 2012 election campaign than there have been in any of the last three elections.

And less than one in five voters says there is any chance at all that he or she will change his or her mind.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the ... _blog.html

I heard from somewhere that undecided voters more offen vote for the new guy, which to me makes sense. After 4 years of an encumbent, if you are unsure, what does that say? Like asking a married person if they will still be married next year and they say "I'm undecided".

Maybe they're waiting for the debates.....

What we have is not working, why would any sane person vote for four more years of economic policies that don't work?