swoop wrote: Since we are on the request to show docs why has O'dumbo still not shown all the docs people have requested? Such as, his educational background, where he went to school, or any of his past tax documents.
Interesting that you only think that President Obama should show his his educational records, "where he went to school: and past tax documents (which he has shown for the past ten years, unlike Romney). Why not make those requests of all candidates rather than single out the President. Why not ask for Romney's police report where a passenger was killed in a car he was driving? Would that not be relevant?
Reid has told not lie, and if Romney wants to prove that Reid's source is not credible, then he simply can do what his father did, and what most major candidates in recent decades has done and release his tax records. Obviusly he is hiding very embarrassing information or it would be a no brainer.
Except for that little detail you forgot... Reid is lying... as per a number of sources. Do you usually kowtow to a lie?
I will be happy to review my details if you care to share your "number of sources". If I find them credible I will withdraw my remark. However, the only one who can prove that Reid's source is lying is Mitt and he is running scared.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
navycpo7 wrote: Amazing isn't it, you demonuts calling on Romney to show last 10 years of his tax returns. Yet obama was asked to show simpler stuff, like his transcripts from school, instead sealed them. Amongst other things. So lets count to 3 and everyone show everthing. Then it is all done. /Romney, obama, reid, pelosi bonehead (speaker) biden, geither, and so on.
Why are you asking for President Obama's transcripts but not Romney? Why single out President Obama for something that no other presidential candidate has been requested to show? What is the difference with President Obama? On the other hand, every major presidential candidate since Romeny's dad has shown their tax returns? Would not the police report regarding the death of the woman that was a result of Romney's driving be more indicative than someones high school transcript?
You can call people names, but what is your motivation behind calling for documents that have no bearing on anything on one candidate but not on the other? You are only demanding documents from Democrats but giving a free pass on Republicans. Demand them from your own party if they are relevant.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
swoop wrote: Since we are on the request to show docs why has O'dumbo still not shown all the docs people have requested? Such as, his educational background, where he went to school, or any of his past tax documents.
Interesting that you only think that President Obama should show his his educational records, "where he went to school: and past tax documents (which he has shown for the past ten years, unlike Romney). Why not make those requests of all candidates rather than single out the President. Why not ask for Romney's police report where a passenger was killed in a car he was driving? Would that not be relevant?
Reid has told not lie, and if Romney wants to prove that Reid's source is not credible, then he simply can do what his father did, and what most major candidates in recent decades has done and release his tax records. Obviusly he is hiding very embarrassing information or it would be a no brainer.
Except for that little detail you forgot... Reid is lying... as per a number of sources. Do you usually kowtow to a lie?
I will be happy to review my details if you care to share your "number of sources". If I find them credible I will withdraw my remark. However, the only one who can prove that Reid's source is lying is Mitt and he is running scared.
You didn't answer my question. Do you kowtow to a lie. Or does your vague respond mean yes? Which would figure. You seem like the type that would be yanked around like you were on a leash.
swoop wrote: Since we are on the request to show docs why has O'dumbo still not shown all the docs people have requested? Such as, his educational background, where he went to school, or any of his past tax documents.
Interesting that you only think that President Obama should show his his educational records, "where he went to school: and past tax documents (which he has shown for the past ten years, unlike Romney). Why not make those requests of all candidates rather than single out the President. Why not ask for Romney's police report where a passenger was killed in a car he was driving? Would that not be relevant?
Reid has told not lie, and if Romney wants to prove that Reid's source is not credible, then he simply can do what his father did, and what most major candidates in recent decades has done and release his tax records. Obviusly he is hiding very embarrassing information or it would be a no brainer.
Except for that little detail you forgot... Reid is lying... as per a number of sources. Do you usually kowtow to a lie?
I will be happy to review my details if you care to share your "number of sources". If I find them credible I will withdraw my remark. However, the only one who can prove that Reid's source is lying is Mitt and he is running scared.
You didn't answer my question. Do you kowtow to a lie. Or does your vague respond mean yes? Which would figure. You seem like the type that would be yanked around like you were on a leash.
Again, you have failed to demonstrate that Reid's claim was a lie. You allege that a "number of sources" demonstrate that he lied, yet you refuse to provide those sources. I question as to who is lying here.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
navycpo7 wrote: Here's a thought, I know that is hard for you to do, but since reid ran his mouth, making accusations that he cannot prove, time to sh*( or get off the pot. Pretty simple. So lets see the proof of his mouthy remarks. But then reid calling someone out is pretty funny, (pot, kettle,black) think that is how you democrats do it.
Just replace "Reid" with Limbaugh/Beck/Hannity/Trump/bat-sh*t-crazy-TeaPublican-of-the-day, and think: 'birth certificate"...Yep, making accusations they cannot prove; time to sh*t or get off the pot. Pretty simple. Let's see the proof of the moron birthers. Pot/Kettle/Black
Payback's a b*tch, ain't it?
What payback, there is no payback, and the only batsH(* here is coming from the demonuts. Your problem is you think that only the demonuts know how to do anything and you think obama in some kind of god. That would put you over the fence beyond left field. When you start realizing that none of those idiots in washington are any good let me know. Reid is a paid public official, he made an accusation that he can't back up, so either put up or shut the hell up. That is his choices.
navycpo7 wrote: Here's a thought, I know that is hard for you to do, but since reid ran his mouth, making accusations that he cannot prove, time to sh*( or get off the pot. Pretty simple. So lets see the proof of his mouthy remarks. But then reid calling someone out is pretty funny, (pot, kettle,black) think that is how you democrats do it.
Just replace "Reid" with Limbaugh/Beck/Hannity/Trump/bat-sh*t-crazy-TeaPublican-of-the-day, and think: 'birth certificate"...Yep, making accusations they cannot prove; time to sh*t or get off the pot. Pretty simple. Let's see the proof of the moron birthers. Pot/Kettle/Black
Payback's a b*tch, ain't it?
Roses are Red, Violets are Blue, Your Comparison is full of Sh$t, and So are You.
Last Time I checked, those four men you mention are not one of the most powerful men in this country... hired by the taxpayers of this country to do an important job. Not one of those men have the power to change our lives with new laws, new taxes, penalties and whatever else they decide is good for us.
So we have a business man and three entertainers eh LJ? These are all still private citizens who have the RIGHT to make whatever allegations they want... they make their own money and you don't have to pay for them or listen to them. We have to listen to Reid, and we have to pay for that 'priviledge'. I would think he owes us more than spending his energy getting involved in the election... it would be nice to have a few high-ups actually working since our president has spent his years mostly campaigning.
You know, if Reid wanted to be a dumbass on camera, it would be a bit less douchelike to do it while leaving his knitting club.... on his day off. I'm pretty sure we could also find someone else to present the weekly shiny object.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
"Put up or shut up" sounds like great advice for tax returns.
You don't know if Reid can back it up or not. So thanks for your partisan speculation (regurgitated from the usual Rightie talking-points sites.) Romney has the choice to refute the charges by releasing the returns. The fact that he won't just tells us that there is something in them that is so damaging he would rather stonewall.
navycpo7 wrote: Amazing isn't it, you demonuts calling on Romney to show last 10 years of his tax returns. Yet obama was asked to show simpler stuff, like his transcripts from school, instead sealed them. Amongst other things. So lets count to 3 and everyone show everthing. Then it is all done. /Romney, obama, reid, pelosi bonehead (speaker) biden, geither, and so on.
Why are you asking for President Obama's transcripts but not Romney? Why single out President Obama for something that no other presidential candidate has been requested to show? What is the difference with President Obama? On the other hand, every major presidential candidate since Romeny's dad has shown their tax returns? Would not the police report regarding the death of the woman that was a result of Romney's driving be more indicative than someones high school transcript?
You can call people names, but what is your motivation behind calling for documents that have no bearing on anything on one candidate but not on the other? You are only demanding documents from Democrats but giving a free pass on Republicans. Demand them from your own party if they are relevant.
so either you cannot read, or you just want to make up your own story from others post. Read I stated that Romney, obama, pelosi, bohner(bonehead), reid geither etc, Both parties are there, which part did you not understand. Lets see if they are all on the up and up
My personal opinion is neither one of the presidential candidates have what it takes to be President. I don't like either one of them.
Democracy4Sale wrote: "Put up or shut up" sounds like great advice for tax returns.
You don't know if Reid can back it up or not. So thanks for your partisan speculation (regurgitated from the usual Rightie talking-points sites.) Romney has the choice to refute the charges by releasing the returns. The fact that he won't just tells us that there is something in them that is so damaging he would rather stonewall.
Hmmmmmm
Hmmmmmmmmm is right, reid made the accusations, plainly stated he has a credible source. So he needs to produce the proof or shut the hell up. Reid is only try to stir the pot, make people think he has something he has nothing of. I don't like Romney one bit, but, if one is going to run his mouth, he better damn will be ready to back it up. I don't believe he can. And again, let have Romney, obama, biden, bonhner, pelosi, geither etc, bring it all to the table, transcripts everything, lets see who is really telling the truth.
