Maybe you should read it again Otis...Medicare would fundamentally change for those under 55...politifact acknowledged that. The Democrats might have chosen their words more carefully...but they are right....no, medicare wont change for me, but it will for my children and grandchildren, and I care a great deal about that...as do most seniors, as do most people under 55 who will retire in the future and probably not rich. How easy it is for a young congressman with congressional pay and guaranteed health benefits to make life and death decisions for the less fortunate.
My comment was a response. I am willing to enter into debates concerning political viewpoints, but that takes two (or more). As the Toad as repeatedly pointed out, he is not interested in discourse but merely wants an echo chamber. He repeatedly refers to my contrairian viewpoints so he clearly does not want to discuss issues but merely drive by cut and pastes. Can you with good conscience point out posts by him that contribute to honest discourse? This forum has denigrated to just insults and "shit thrown on the wall" so why continue to provide intelligent fact based discoure? It is not like posters like Toad, hypocriticalbill, bearmthib, etc. will respond in kind. Tried but not happening. I respond in kind anymore. If Toad and hypocriticalbill want to throw shit, I will throw it back in their face.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
BOVINE EXCREMENT! You are nothing more than a contrarian that exacerbates discussions on serious topics by saying that anyone who opposes Obama is wrong, racist, and stupid. Face the facts or STFU!
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
otisptoadwater wrote: BOVINE EXCREMENT! You are nothing more than a contrarian that exacerbates discussions on serious topics by saying that anyone who opposes Obama is wrong, racist, and stupid. Face the facts or STFU!
Where have I done that? I have provided facts, documentation, truth to expose your lies. As to you being wrong, racist and stupid, that is on you and your comments.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
otisptoadwater wrote: BOVINE EXCREMENT! You are nothing more than a contrarian that exacerbates discussions on serious topics by saying that anyone who opposes Obama is wrong, racist, and stupid. Face the facts or STFU!
Where have I done that? I have provided facts, documentation, truth to expose your lies. As to you being wrong, racist and stupid, that is on you and your comments.
"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown
otisptoadwater wrote: BOVINE EXCREMENT! You are nothing more than a contrarian that exacerbates discussions on serious topics by saying that anyone who opposes Obama is wrong, racist, and stupid. Face the facts or STFU!
Oh goody, another STFU conservative post, that's when we know they are losing the debate.
Reply with some facts, I bet you have none (note the source of the OP).
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
otisptoadwater wrote: [sarcasm]The Obamacare death panels will be far more compassionate I'm sure. "Well sure your are sick, get in line and we'll get back to you when it's your turn to experience Socialized Medicine at it's worst..."[/sarcasm]
HAHA! That's rich. You don't believe the TeaOP voted to end Medicare, but you go full sinker for the death panel BS. HAHA!
You are classic. At least we know you are just trying to entertain us and not trying to be serious now.
When you plant ice you're going to harvest wind. - Robert Hunter
Raees wrote: Toad, Toad. BOTH of your links are to last year's stories... Surely with all your outrage, you can find something more recent....
You want a more recent story? Here's one...
Democrats have jumped on Ryan’s budget proposal since he first presented it in 2011. His plan called for a massive change to Medicare — stopping the current Medicare system in 2022 for new beneficiaries and instead launching a so-called “premium-support” system, where seniors would pick from a choice of private plans on a new Medicare exchange with the help of government-provided subsidies. Claims that this would “end Medicare” — claims that were usually accompanied by images of elderly individuals — left the false impression that the Ryan plan would get rid of any kind of insurance program for seniors.
Furthermore, this plan didn’t pertain to the seniors pictured in the attack ads — they would remain on traditional Medicare, with only new beneficiaries in 2022 and beyond joining the private system. The claim made our list of the “Whoppers of 2011,” and so far, Democrats are making a good case for its inclusion in our 2012 list.
Here’s a quick rundown of the latest Ryan plan:
■For seniors who are now in Medicare, nothing changes. They can stay with the traditional program as it is.
■Beginning in 2023, 65-year-olds would have their choice of insurance plans — private and traditional — on a new Medicare exchange. A premium-support payment, like a subsidy, would be sent to the plan of their choice.
■If the chosen plan costs more than the premium-support, the senior would pay the difference.
■The Medicare eligibility age would be slowly raised to 67 by 2034.
■All plans on the Medicare exchange would offer a base level of benefits, and they would be regulated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
■The premium-support payments would be tied to the second-cheapest plan, which can’t grow more than gross domestic product plus 0.5 percentage points. If the cost does grow faster, Congress would be required to step in and take some action to keep costs down.
Choice of private plans. Medicare exchange. Subsidies. Wow, this is Obamacare for seniors!
It looks like there really isn't that big a difference between Dems and Repubs. Well, at the very least it's better than the Dem's plan because they don't even have one. lol