Still don't have anything except "Not Obama", do you?

Still don't have anything except "Not Obama", do you?

rofllol

Still don't have ONE SINGLE POST that touts something concrete, definitive, provable in support of your candidate... How could you, he still hasn't said anything specific yet. Nothing but convention-speak general talking-points. "If we tell you what we'll do, we'll lose." :Koolaid:

You may return to your Obama-bashing now... rofllol

Let us know if you come up with anything to be FOR.... (other than he's the "Not Obama"...)

Not Obama is enough.

I rest my case...

"Not Obama's policies" is probably enough for all conservatives and most repubs. IMO it's not enough for independents and undecided swing voters. I imagine they will vote on a single favorite issue, likeability, or response to negative ads. Or maybe jobs/economy.

Or women's rights. The list goes on and on.

2wlady wrote: Or women's rights. The list goes on and on.

You mean like the Dems that flat out lied insinuating that a Romney administration would end abortion, prevent women from voting, blocking women from getting contraception...blah blah Lying blah. You all need a little more than scare tactics to win this one (lots of blind sheep will work though).

Imagine how large of a failure Obama has been shown to be when anyone but Obama is sufficient to create a neck and neck contest. Compare that to Reagan's reelection bid. A runaway election in which his challanger managed to secure the electoral votes of but a single State. Can't think of a much weaker candidate than one that nearly half the voters are willing to cast their vote for anyone other than them and where it is likely that half of his support comes from yellow dogs who simply vote based on the initial representing a political party. All good indications of how successful he's been as president.

You mean like the Dems that flat out lied insinuating that a Romney administration would end abortion, prevent women from voting, blocking women from getting contraception...blah blah Lying blah. You all need a little more than scare tactics to win this one (lots of blind sheep will work though).

Flat out lie? A Romney administration WOULD try to end abortion. They WOULD try to block women from getting contraception, especially the women who can't afford it on their own.

You've said, PS, that men should be able to get their Viagra type drugs through their insurance companies. It's all about "natural" functions. Let's take that a little further. Anyone should be able to get hearing aids, but they usually aren't covered by insurance. Using your logic, because hearing is a "natural" function, people SHOULD be able to get hearing aids through insurance. But since contraception isn't "natural," women should pay for it themselves.

I don't know anything about preventing women from voting, however.

Seriously?

There are some social issues I wish both sides would stay out of. The only one I really am interested in getting involved in is abortion. I know it is unreasonable to think we can make it against the law, that would cause way more problems than it solves but being for it (for some ) is a militant push to get abortions without even considering a father's position. We are talking about life here and that is important but there are social issues on both sides I wish they would just stay out of.

I think both sides are way too involved in the social issues. That is was America is about, let the people decide.

But number one reason I would vote republican over Dem is the economy. Republican or Democrat the two best presidents int he last 25 years were moderate. Clinton and Reagan. Obama is the most polar Democrat I have ever seen. He believes that government should be involved in our lives and is way too involved in guiding people to do things in a certain way to make life better. Generally, I don't believe in that much involvement.

And give me a break. Essentially Obama should be fired for his "read my lips" promise of balanced budget and transparency. None of which even tried to happen. And a second term nightmare president is going to go off the charts when he does not have to worry about being elected.

I am not buying his crying over his desk about the poor people of america speech. Democrats and the Obamas do not corner the market on caring. And some complain about war but ignore that their own president is in a war.

One of our original concepts when starting 285bound.com compared to another area website, was not to meddle in the affairs of posters. The more you take down posts and edit them and tell them how to post the more responsibility you take for people on your site. Now some people are okay with that. But I have found and look at the country is this way as well: Once you get people dependent on something or on you, you take away their spirit, their creativity and in some cases their ability to feed themselves. As stated before I believe in taking care of our sick and our poor but I think the Obama way is about thinking that compassion for people that have not is about doing it for them. This county was NOT founded on that principal and that is why I cannot vote for that thinking. If everyone does well then it helps everyone. It absolutely is a class war and that just does not fix our financial problems if people who have money are doing well naturally. Then most likely so will the middle class. We all should want to do well.


From the Tao te Ching.

A great nation is like a great man: when he makes a mistake, he realizes it.
Having realized it, he admits it.
Having admitted it he corrects it.
He considers those who point out his faults
as his most benevolent teachers.
He thinks of his enemy
as the shadow he himself casts.

If a nation is centered it nourishes it's own people.
and it doesn't meddle in the affairs of others,
it will be a light to all nations of the world.