Mitt's lies, topic #1 - 99!

11 Oct 2012 18:10 - 11 Oct 2012 19:29 #41 by Something the Dog Said

Blazer Bob wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote:

Blazer Bob wrote: I have no problem merging identical threads. I prefer that similar threads remain separate and I don't let my mashed potatoes touch my peas.

OTOH, if there are business reasons for it I favor that users STFU and stop whining.

Who said there were business reasons for consolidating the threads? .


Do you need help with the definition of if? I can think of a couple of possibilities.

Since you are the only one who has brought this issue up, please advise to these business reasons. The owners of the board have certainly not brought this issue up to any of the posters here.

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2012 18:52 #42 by ScienceChic

archer wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: The consolidation has pretty much killed off any discussions at this point.

Which is what prompted my post, it seemed like that was the point of consolidating those 3 threads. I'm hoping that isn't true, but it is the first time that I can recall three totally different threads were combined into one.

Sorry but neither point is true. We've had instances of people (both liberal and conservative) starting many threads in one day in order to prove a point or "get back at the other side", and even though some of those were not identical topics, they were merged. The business reason for combining threads is that if people come here to read topics, see a jumbled mess that isn't organized well and lots of threads with very few responses/discussion, they are more likely to leave - less activity means businesses have no reason to advertise here. No advertisers = no covering the cost of running the board.

Sorry STDS, but your first thread Topic #3 started at 3:24 had 3 responses and ended at 3:44pm yesterday.
Topic #4 was started at 3:42, had 3 responses, ended at 3:48pm.
Topic #5 began at 6:00, 2 responses, ended at 9:23pm.
Topic #6 started at 6:16pm, actually had 9 responses and was pointed out by more than one person that STDS was spamming the board.
Topic #7 started at 7:13pm, 1 response, done at 8:57pm.

If people wanted to continue those discussions they had plenty of time to do so, and still can as all of the posts are still here - they were obviously not interested since we didn't merge them until today at 9:59am, more than 12 hours after the last thread was posted in, save Topic #6. Feel free to disagree with my analysis if you wish, but that's how I'm calling it.

I find it interesting that no one has responded to the request for opinions on creating 4 master threads. If you don't like the "spam" that the other side is doing, that will solve the problem. Not so palatable is it, is what I think. You'll (general you, not directed at archer or STDS) complain that the other side does it so you do it back, then they do it back - it's like Israel and Palestine. People are more interested in pissing off the other side than listening and understanding, making a rational debate back, finding common ground and common solutions. Drama is always more exciting. So it's up to you guys how you want to conduct yourselves. You can provide some input as to how you'd like the board organized, but it will be organized or it's not going to last.

You've got a place to post whatever you like without fear of being targeted unfairly by mods, banned for questioning the mods, treated like children by staff, posts deleted and conversations abruptly ended by locking threads. With freedom comes responsibility and maturity, and I know we're capable of it. Yes, it means that threads are going to get moved and/or merged - that's the nature of message boards. You can give constructive input, or you can complain; you can modify how you post, or get your stuff moved. Not trying to sound harsh, just breaking it down and you know I welcome the constructive criticism and incorporate good ideas! :)

To end on a positive note, check out those Business Partners up above - 9 of the 19 have been with us since I've owned this site and we've added more than we've lost. I'm f***ing proud of that and this board! So many places I go, I hear from business owners and nonprofit leaders about how great 285Bound is (if they've heard of us), how a much better (nicer, and yes, they do use that exact term) site it is than any other up here, what a great service this board provides to the community, and that the businesses love being a part of it (don't believe me, go ask 'em. If they're blowing sunshine up my ass, I'd like to know!). They love that they get to connect to the community this way. I'd love to show them that they aren't wrong about believing in this site!

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2012 19:18 #43 by archer
Replied by archer on topic Mitt's lies, topic #1 - 99!
Hmmmm... I don't think you can accuse me of spamming the board with multiple daily posts, my concern over this particular consolidation was as an observer and a poster who planned to participate, not knowing that if I waited too long those threads would become unrecognizable. Time would have made these threads disappear if no one was interested. I appreciate the fine line you walk here, and really, this is the first time I have felt compelled to
take issue with any action regarding this board.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2012 19:25 #44 by Hoot Owl
Well said Science Chick, now if you could change the topic title..... Mitts lies #1-99.
Archer I dont think you were called on spamming the board.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2012 19:28 #45 by Something the Dog Said
I can not help that the conservatives here can not find any way to support their candidate and chose not to post or continue to discuss, other than Fred and Renegade. I do note that the those threads had picked up steam at the time that they were consolidated. I generally do not post until the late mornings, and was in the process of debating with Fred when the consolidation occurred and all became jumbled. These were not spamming, as I stayed away from the drive by cut and paste and provided my own thoughts and opinions. I doubt that you intended the de facto moderating but that is the appearance.

I get it, but perhaps you should make it clear in the terms of service that if a certain number of posts have not occurred in a thread within a certain time period, that those threads will be consolidated. Respectfully, I am curious as to why threads are not allowed to live or die on their own merits, but need to be consolidated? Is there a financial cost associated with allowing threads to continue without consolidation into other threads? Is there a cost with having numerous threads going on? Not being contrary, but am genuinely curious.

I am not being belligerent and am not questioning the right of the owner to do with the forums as they see fit. It is my decision to post here and engage in discussions and accept the restrictions placed on the my ability to post.

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2012 19:35 #46 by Hoot Owl
Something the Dog Said- If you clicked on active topics it was all you all the time. It was boring since no one was engaging you. But then I need to get a life, apparently.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2012 19:37 #47 by Something the Dog Said
Fred did try to engage, but he had no material to work with. Mitt does lie.

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2012 19:44 #48 by Martin Ent Inc
And so does Obama so what is your point?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2012 19:48 #49 by Something the Dog Said
Well let's start talking about them and see if they are lies or simply remarks taken out of context. I outlined 7 concrete examples or so that mixed up in here somewhere that Mitt made in just the past couple of weeks. Do you believe they are lies, or do you believe that these remarks were taken out of context and stand for something other than pandering? Try them one at a time, rather than just saying the other side does it as well.

I am willing to discuss in another thread any remarks made by President Obama that you are consider to be outrageous lies.

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Oct 2012 22:27 #50 by LadyJazzer

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.164 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+