Mitt's lies, topic #1 - 99!

Mitt claims that Obamacare is terrible and that he would repeal it (not sure how he plans to give himself the power to do that). That the individual mandate on the federal level is terrible, but is ok on the state level. Hmm, just today Mitt ranted about how Obama should have supported Wyden-Bennet health care proposal in 2009 rather than create ObamaCares. He had this to say about Wyden Bennet health care proposal:
“You look at Wyden-Bennett. That’s a health care plan that a number of Republicans think is a very good health care plan — one that we support,” he told NBC News in June 2009. “Take a look at that one.”

Only one problem. Wyden-Bennet includes an individual mandate to purchase health care insurance, just like ObamaCares.

So much for his position that the individual mandate is a terrible idea. Liar, liar.

Um, just because you like a plan doesn't mean you like all of it.

For example, I like some parts of Obamacare but dislike more than I like.

I think you use "lies" when you mean something else.

Nope, Mitt lies.

Just today, Mitt told the Des Moines Register that he would not support legislation to restrict access to abortion. Two hours later, his own campaign says that was not true, that he would support legislation to restrict access to abortion. So which lie are you to believe?

Scrapping the law, should be a pretty easy for Republicans—if they win the election. (both house and senate, not likely)
So without the 60 votes they would need to sway someone on the democrat side of the isle.

He could however scrap some of the provisions of the bill.

Even the Morman church accepts abortion.

You really need to step away from the Lying Media.

Yep... I put this one up yesterday:

Oh, NO... Another Mitt-Flop... After saying he supported "Roe v. Wade" and a "woman's right to choose"; and then having a "come-to-Jesus meeting' (so to speak) during the primaries, and becoming a "SEVERELY CONSERVATIVE" candidate who all of sudden believed in NO abortions, under ANY circumstances... We now have the latest attempt to "move toward the center", and "Mitt-flop" the "Mitt-Flop":

Mitt Romney Abortion Stance Changes, As Candidate Says He Won't Push To Restrict Access

Mitt Romney said Tuesday he has no plans to push for legislation limiting abortion, a softer stance from a candidate who has said he would "get rid of" funding for Planned Parenthood and appoint Supreme Court who would overturn Roe v. Wade.

“There’s no legislation with regards to abortion that I’m familiar with that would become part of my agenda,” the Republican presidential nominee told The Des Moines Register in an interview.

Wait a minute... HOLD THE PRESSES.... Within 2 Hours, "the campaign had to 'walk it back'..."

The Romney campaign walked back the remark within two hours of the Register posting its story. Spokeswoman Andrea Saul told the National Review Online's Katrina Trinko that Romney "would of course support legislation aimed at providing greater protections for life."

His statement could put him at odds with congressional Republicans who have made limiting abortion central to their messages. His own running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), has introduced bills to restrict access to abortion. And the Republican Party platform toughened its anti-abortion stance earlier this year.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/0 ... 52780.html

Is that like saying your health care plan "covers pre-existing conditions" in the debate...(Only to have "the campaign 'walk it back' within 2 hours after the debate is over, when everybody knew it was a complete lie in the first place??)

Dang I can't post these fast enough before the "campaign 'walks it back'...." Now we're down to posting the Mitt-Flop (from the second position back to the first position)...and then the "walk-back" of the "walk-back" in the same message. But when the Mitt-bot speaks, the TeaHadists must obey...

You CAN NOT make this sh*t up... rofllol rofllol

Martin Ent Inc wrote: You really need to step away from the Lying Media.

Sorry...It has nothing to do with "lying media"... This is MITT, IN AN INTERVIEW--ON CAMERA, saying one thing, and then the ROMNEY CAMPAIGN, walking it back two hours later...

But thanks for playing.

Mitt, during the debate and in practically every media event, claims that he would get tough on China, their subsidies of exports and currency manipulation. Yet, in his own pursuit of profits over American jobs, he has invested heavily in those very same companies that receive subsidies from the chinese government to destroy American jobs. Both Bain and Mitt personally bought two camshaft factories that employed about 500 people in Michigan. By 2007 both were shut down. Now Asimco manufactures the same components in China on government-donated land in a coastal region that China has designated an export base, where companies are eligible for the sort of subsidies Mr. Romney says create an unfair trade imbalance. And who owns Asimco? Yep, Bain and Mitt.


Of course Mitt has been doing this for decades, closing down American plants in order to gain additional profits from Chinese subsidized imports.

Liar, liar. Mitt, your actions show your words to simply be lies.

Mitt also claims that he would crack down on intellectual property piracy by Chinese governments. Well, let's see, Gome Electrical Appliances is one of the largest of these pirates, who according to Microsoft sells computers with pirated Microsoft software. And who owns Gome, one may ask. Why Bain and Mitt. Hmm, one would think that Mitt could solve that problem himself already.