PA Dead Even.

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

Raees wrote: Even Fox News is beginning to see reality. Britt Hume on Fox News this morning.

“I think the conventional wisdom is trending now towards a Obama win, something along the lines of what Karl Rove and his team pulled off for President Bush in 2004, but I’m by no means certain,” Hume told Fox News host Chris Wallace. “And there’s this striking discrepancy between national polls — which tend to be done, by and large, by older, more-seasoned polling firms — and state polls — a number of which are done by less-established firms. The national polls have this a tie. The state polls, as you just suggested — the battleground state polls suggest and indicate that President Obama is ahead in all of them.”

“It seems striking that there would be this difference,” he added. “And it is sobering, if you’re a Romney supporter, to think that he is trailing or just tied in so many of those states.”

“I think it’s unlikely — it’s hard to imagine as a political journalist that all these many polls are off. But the discrepancy is unmistakable and puzzling.”

Raw Story ( http://s.tt/1rWqB )

The reality is the rest of his comment which you so sneakily left out...

“There is considerable heartburn among Republicans these days over polls that seem to have a disprortionate number of Democrats responding… In a strong year for Democratic candidates more people will say their Democrats and vice versa… Four years ago in a very big for Democrats election day exit polling showed more Democrats voted than Republicans by seven percentage points. The same margin by the way that Barack Obama won the election. Not many people believe as many Democrats will vote this year. Yet a compilation of all recent polls by Pollster.com showed samples contained on average more Democrats by, you guessed it, seven percentage points.”

Stop tap dancing... your not that good.

Raees wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: The New York Daily News endorsed Obama yesterday/today. Last election they were square in endorsing President Obama. The New York Daily News is the NYT lite.

Now I'm confused. Your original post said the NY Daily News endorsed Obama. Now you say it endorsed Romney. What am I missing here?

Raees wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

Raees wrote: Even Fox News is beginning to see reality. Britt Hume on Fox News this morning.

“I think the conventional wisdom is trending now towards a Obama win, something along the lines of what Karl Rove and his team pulled off for President Bush in 2004, but I’m by no means certain,” Hume told Fox News host Chris Wallace. “And there’s this striking discrepancy between national polls — which tend to be done, by and large, by older, more-seasoned polling firms — and state polls — a number of which are done by less-established firms. The national polls have this a tie. The state polls, as you just suggested — the battleground state polls suggest and indicate that President Obama is ahead in all of them.”

“It seems striking that there would be this difference,” he added. “And it is sobering, if you’re a Romney supporter, to think that he is trailing or just tied in so many of those states.”

“I think it’s unlikely — it’s hard to imagine as a political journalist that all these many polls are off. But the discrepancy is unmistakable and puzzling.”

Raw Story ( http://s.tt/1rWqB )

The reality is the rest of his comment which you so sneakily left out...

“There is considerable heartburn among Republicans these days over polls that seem to have a disprortionate number of Democrats responding… In a strong year for Democratic candidates more people will say their Democrats and vice versa… Four years ago in a very big for Democrats election day exit polling showed more Democrats voted than Republicans by seven percentage points. The same margin by the way that Barack Obama won the election. Not many people believe as many Democrats will vote this year. Yet a compilation of all recent polls by Pollster.com showed samples contained on average more Democrats by, you guessed it, seven percentage points.”

Stop tap dancing... your not that good.

Sorry, I "sneakily left it out" because we are not allowed to quote entire copyright articles on here. That's not in the article I linked.

Raees wrote: As opposed to your faulty conservative sources?

Science Chic wrote: I've now got a friendly wager riding with residenttroll on the outcome of this election. There's lunch and a nice bottle of whiskey or wine on the line!

Science Chic wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

Science Chic wrote: I've now got a friendly wager riding with residenttroll on the outcome of this election. There's lunch and a nice bottle of whiskey or wine on the line!

You're actually betting someone that Green will win?

rofllol Good Gawd no, man! There's a 1982 Silver Oak, Alexander Valley at stake; I'm playing to win, not be idealistic! :cool0012: