Don't agree at all. But you are welcome to your opinion.
Charles Whitman killed 16 people from the 28th floor observation deck at the UT clock tower on Aug. 1, 1966. Dozens more were injured.
With an antique gun.
Your trap gun can kill as amny if not more if you were so inclined.
A revolver could cause as much carnage as well.
As the masses cower in fear of evenyour trap gun you can reload many many times before confronting an officer or a person willing to take you on.
As for "assualt style weapons"
People are afraid of what they don't understand.
I understand assault weapons far better than you'll ever realize, and I don't fear them. I don't see their necessity in our society. It is a tool who's only job is to kill people and I believe desiring to own such a weapon demonstrates something disturbing.
The truth is my trap gun does not have the same potential for destruction as an AK-47. My trap gun is limited in capacity and range. It cannot hurl as much lead through the air in the same amount of time as an Uzi. Perhaps as important, the trap gun's appearance makes it clear what the tool's intent is (it has frilly gold birds on it, for Pete's sake), whereas the assault weapon is designed to look intimidating, to make it clear it's job is violence towards people. Your wrong to categorize all guns as the same when it is clear they are not. Sure, violence is committed with antique hunting guns as well, but that is a clear misuse of the tool, and we can never stop every possibility about gun violence...but why not work to prevent what we can?
I find your attitude to be defeatist; believing the only way to combat violence is with violence. I refuse to accept this because it is not an absolute truth if you don't let it be.
Martin, or anyone, what else would you propose as a solution?
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
Once agin PV I find you are uneducated in weaponry, and your I will give up my freedoms if it saves just 1 life is an open door for your relinquishment to All freedoms.
Not sure SC however when I was young we had archery and shooting education in our schools. I used to hunt with the coaches and principal after school. we had 4000+ in my graduating class.
Hands on was something most every student learned.
Yes we had race riots a few people were even killed. we did not have video games, no one talked about a stupid high Score in # of kills etc.
Students were not rewarded for incompetence. Spanking was allowed, disipline was enforced.
Today society has become Non existant. Only wanting someone else to take responsibility for their kids, their lives, their mistakes, their downfalls, etc.
Common sense has been replaced by the news.
Martin Ent Inc wrote: Once agin PV I find you are uneducated in weaponry, and your I will give up my freedoms if it saves just 1 life is an open door for your relinquishment to All freedoms.
Not sure SC however when I was young we had archery and shooting education in our schools. I used to hunt with the coaches and principal after school. we had 4000+ in my graduating class.
Hands on was something most every student learned.
Yes we had race riots a few people were even killed. we did not have video games, no one talked about a stupid high Score in # of kills etc.
Students were not rewarded for incompetence. Spanking was allowed, disipline was enforced.
Today society has become Non existant. Only wanting someone else to take responsibility for their kids, their lives, their mistakes, their downfalls, etc.
Common sense has been replaced by the news.
We're not that far apart, Martin. I too believe kids should be educated about guns, rather than sheltered from them. I would welcome such education in public schools.
Martin, you don't know me. You really don't know a thing about me, and your assessment that I am "uneducated in weaponry" is presumptuous and arrogant. I have substantial exposure, experience, and history with a number of different firearms. Your leap to a conclusion is exactly the wrong attitude for any gun owner to have. You assume that because I am rational and intelligent enough to recognize the current situation isn't working means I am willing to roll over and give up all my rights, but your 'all or nothing' stance shows you have an inability to understand nuance, difficulty allowing mutual concessions for the good of all, and an unwillingness to consider compromise. The status quo is not working...you must be willing to change or nothing will ever improve.
Science Chic wrote: Martin, or anyone, what else would you propose as a solution?
In these most recent cases. Society/family failed the shooters, in each and every one of these cases red flags were either ignored or missed by people close to the shooters.
And limiting of any weapon is going to change what?
And what of society that pushes drug after drug on people instead of dealing with the real issue.
The rewarding of negative behavior with $$ or presents or games etc.
The dependency of government to take care of peoples kids,
The attitude of I want mine and screw the rest.
The lack of real punishment ie: spanking OMG etc.
well gotta run and in all honesty i have enjoyed our discussion PV.
I would have LOVED to have taken an archery class while in school, that's a great idea! Weapon education as an elective or requirement? That could be really cool too. Hunting in an urban setting is going to require some creativity.
I agree that video games make us more desensitized, and divorce us from the reality of handling/using a weapon, but the reality is that we have them and we need to move forward with them in our lives not bemoan the fact that life was better before them. Is there a movement that needs to be started to encourage people not to buy violent games, either for themselves or especially for their kids? Manufacturers won't make what people won't buy, but will if they continue to generate profits so it's up to us to exercise self-control and common sense and not buy Call of Duty no matter if it would be fun or not.
Not rewarding participation alone, I'm cool with that. I myself would encourage more parents to enroll their kids in martial arts - it both teaches them how to defend themselves, and increases self-confidence and responsibility. My daughter's Taekwondo instructor was a 15 year old black belt when she started, who also served on one of the ski resort's ski patrols and was an honor student. That's the role model I want for my kids, and where I hope they are by that age.
I don't think today's society has become "non-existent", it's just different than it was before. Maybe better, maybe worse, you could argue both ways, but we do need to increase the personal responsibility and self-initiative, no arguments there from me. It is a broad-brush saying that parents don't enforce discipline, because the friends I have with kids sure do. Sure there are bad parents, but they are far outnumbered by those who do try their hardest to raise good kids.
Required military service? Honestly, I'm torn. I believe there would be good lessons learned for everyone to experience it first-hand, but I don't want my kids serving when we have leaders who send us into doomed-to-fail combat situations, with what seems to be no decent comprehension of the history of the culture we are going to "save" and trying to push our ideals on a group that will never accept our way of doing things because that's not what they've learned from infancy and our efforts are destined to only cost us precious lives and massive costly failure. My kids lives are worth more than that.
:thumbsup: Good ideas, any more out there?
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
If the weapon isn't available, it can't be used to commit violent acts. Pretty simple. Stop allowing for the production and sale of weapons we don't need in our society. I think reasonable restrictions can be determined. Or like I said, bring back the armory system...you want to own an assault weapon, a machine gun, a bazooka...fine, but you'll have to register it locally with the armory. You can go get it when you want/need it, but you'll need to bring it back, have it stored at the armory, safely secured. Simply make it illegal to possess such a weapon unless it's registered with your local armory. I think it's a solution that can work on many levels.
plaidvillain wrote: I understand assault weapons far better than you'll ever realize, and I don't fear them. I don't see their necessity in our society. It is a tool who's only job is to kill people and I believe desiring to own such a weapon demonstrates something disturbing.
I'd like to offer some food for thought on this and maybe help you see a point of view. Its a fact that to gain independence, our country was fought for using weapons of equal quality and capability to that of England's army. While many don't see black powder rifles as anything other than novelty or historic items these days given our technology, they were in fact the 'assault weapons' of their day. While I'm sure it doesn't need to be said, I'll quote it anyway and apply it to our modern world. The 2nd Amendment:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
Now before everyone sighs and says "Oh great, he posted the 2A again...." please hear me out.
Militaries across the globe use weapons that our forefathers may never have fathomed were possible. And while its very 'American' to think that we're somehow invincible to attack/invasion from another country the simple facts exist that: 1. Our own armies will be heavily invested in defending us, and 2. They can only do so much in so many areas, that it might become a reality that the average citizen has to take up arms and defend the very comforts we've become accustomed to.
I don't know about you, but if such a thing were to occur, I'd much rather charge in with something of current capabilites than a musket. This is not a statement of fear however, but one of scientific logic seriously. To suggest it as fear would be to ask a simple question..... do you carry a spare tire in your vehicle because you're afraid to get a flat or are you simply prepared for a possibility?