Keep it UP NRA!

And meanwhile, let's hope the New York gun-control legislation becomes a model for as many states as possible....

Gee, they could set up their own ALEC-style website so all those other state legislatures can have their boilerplates.

RenegadeCJ wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: Really disgusting that the NRA feels it is necessary to drag the children of the President into their attack ads. Keep it classy, NRA.

That is pretty much the definition of hypocrisy. Obama wants one thing for himself, another for those of us who are his subjects. Same with vouchers. His kids go to private schools, but we little people are stuck with whatever school our area happens to have, unless we are rich like him, and can go to a private school.

It sounds like you are jealous of President Obama

The Dude wrote:

RenegadeCJ wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: Really disgusting that the NRA feels it is necessary to drag the children of the President into their attack ads. Keep it classy, NRA.

That is pretty much the definition of hypocrisy. Obama wants one thing for himself, another for those of us who are his subjects. Same with vouchers. His kids go to private schools, but we little people are stuck with whatever school our area happens to have, unless we are rich like him, and can go to a private school.

It sounds like you are jealous of President Obama

I thought they were all for a plutocracy where the rich get to keep their money, and everyone else waited for it to trickle-down?

The Dude wrote:

RenegadeCJ wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote: Really disgusting that the NRA feels it is necessary to drag the children of the President into their attack ads. Keep it classy, NRA.

That is pretty much the definition of hypocrisy. Obama wants one thing for himself, another for those of us who are his subjects. Same with vouchers. His kids go to private schools, but we little people are stuck with whatever school our area happens to have, unless we are rich like him, and can go to a private school.

It sounds like you are jealous of President Obama

??? Commenting on the fact that someone in position of authority over me, and makes rules which I must abide by, but they are exempt due to their position is jealousy? How about we just use his own words. Fairness. Why should he have something we are unable to have?

The only argument that you have made why you "are unable to have" armed guards at a private school is that the President is able to afford to send his kids to a private school. You, however, are envious of his wealth, and seem to think that you are entitled to have the taxpayer foot the bill for a similar luxury.

Something the Dog Said wrote: The only argument that you have made why you "are unable to have" armed guards at a private school is that the President is able to afford to send his kids to a private school. You, however, are envious of his wealth, and seem to think that you are entitled to have the taxpayer foot the bill for a similar luxury.

But you are OK with mandating insurance companies(and their premium payers) provide you with free birth control, health insurance for your 26 year only son living at home out of work, etc.

LadyJazzer wrote: What part of "ALL PRESIDENTS AND THEIR CHILDREN GET SECRET SERVICE PROTECTION" do you not get?

And the sheep continue to bleat what the NRA tells them to....

Thanks NRA!! Jus' keep doin' what yer doin'....

Pathetic...

I have several very well to do friends. In the past there have been abduction attempts on their children. They make sure their kids are safe in schools, none of which are public schools.

Don't the children of private citizens deserve the chance to be safe as well?

The ad is a bit over-the-top. IMO

Nobody that matters wrote: I have several very well to do friends. In the past there have been abduction attempts on their children. They make sure their kids are safe in schools, none of which are public schools.

Don't the children of private citizens deserve the chance to be safe as well?

It's not about safety. It's about national security.

A terrorist group could kidnap any president's children and use them to force the president into doing something that harms the U.S.

I wouldn't put it past a terrorist group to videotape cutting off appendages until the president agrees.

Any president's kids are a key to the president for a terrorist organization.

The NRA doesn't seem to get that.

You are trying to strain a camel through the eye of a needle.

You are arguing that since the safety of the first children is a matter of national security they should be kept safer. Since they are safer being protected by guns and that affects national security it is ok that are children arn't protected by guns because they are not as important.

You might as well argue that the ''common man" is less entitled to an annual check up than the mayor.

Raees wrote:

Nobody that matters wrote: I have several very well to do friends. In the past there have been abduction attempts on their children. They make sure their kids are safe in schools, none of which are public schools.

Don't the children of private citizens deserve the chance to be safe as well?

It's not about safety. It's about national security.

A terrorist group could kidnap any president's children and use them to force the president into doing something that harms the U.S.

I wouldn't put it past a terrorist group to videotape cutting off appendages until the president agrees.

Any president's kids are a key to the president for a terrorist organization.

The NRA doesn't seem to get that.