This pretty much makes the cake and puts icing on it. Whereas a true conservative can argue both sides of the fence, a true liberal will never know that kind of openess. Good day.
Oh yea, and since a select few posters here looooove to use polls as firepower (although saying that a poll includes every last of the millions of people in this country is laughable) notice THIS poll.
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
Off Topic: Thank you Otis, perhaps we'll share some beers someday.
On Topic: If armed personell is good for HIS kids, it's sure as hell good enough for kids like the one's that attend Evergreen H.S, Deer Creek Middle, Conifer H.S, Elk Creek Elementary, West Jeff Elementary, etc etc etc. Just sayin. Bias b.s don't wash.
Something the Dog Said wrote: Really disgusting that the NRA feels it is necessary to drag the children of the President into their attack ads. Keep it classy, NRA.
That is pretty much the definition of hypocrisy. Obama wants one thing for himself, another for those of us who are his subjects. Same with vouchers. His kids go to private schools, but we little people are stuck with whatever school our area happens to have, unless we are rich like him, and can go to a private school.
Too bad future generations aren't here to see all the great things we are spending their $$ on!!
And meanwhile President Obama plans to use children as a prop for his gun bans, the same children he doesn't support having armed guards.
To save on Secret Service expenses, we should just make DC a gun free zone. That will work.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
