Catholic Hospital Says Fetuses Are Not People: Bereft Father In Malpractice Case Says Defense Is To 'Make Their Bottom Line'
Stodgill tries to understand the arguments hospital lawyers have made. He prints out the documents sent to him from the case, sits in a chair at home and reads them. His book of briefs is now two-and-a-half inches thick, far fatter than the phone book in his canyonlands community. He said the defense arguments it contains – including that his twin boys, who were seven months in the womb, don’t qualify as people — defy common sense and what he knows to be true. Still, he figures that what he thinks he is owed is of little consequence in a world where the giant wheels of corporate health care spin.
Personhood issues aside, what hospital would not try to save 7 month fetuses by performing a C-section? That alone should be worth a malpractice suit, but to have a Catholic hospital arguing that two 7 month fetuses are not human....isn't that against everything they have been arguing FOR?
I suspect this is a case of lawyers mucking up the waters.
The Catholic Church cannot have it both ways.
A doctor failed to answer a page?
Why couldn't 28 wk old unborn babies be saved?
Since the OP did not provide a link, here are some possible sources for the quote:
[lmgtfy:lsdp60d4]Catholic Hospital Says Fetuses Are Not People[/lmgtfy:lsdp60d4]
Experience enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again - Jeanne Pincha-Tulley
Comprehensive is Latin for there is lots of bad stuff in it - Trey Gowdy
jf1acai wrote: Since the OP did not provide a link, here are some possible sources for the quote:
[lmgtfy:1gdixf93]Catholic Hospital Says Fetuses Are Not People[/lmgtfy:1gdixf93]
I tried googling the first sentence and came up with nothing...
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.