Why would I admit something that's irrelevant? What existed in 1998, IN NO WAY IMPLIES that it existed in 2002...And MORE TO THE POINT, we have hours and hours of footage of people who were involved in collecting the intel who say they TOLD THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION THERE WAS NOTHING THERE, and they LIED ABOUT IT ANYWAY.
I don't give a flip what the situation was in 1998... The LIES THAT BUSH TOLD in 2002 were based on what was found in 2002.
But you feel free to continue to try to apologize for Bush's lies and cooked-intelligence...I would expect nothing less.
LadyJazzer wrote: Moving them out of Iraq where they are no longer needed, to another location where they ARE needed is NOT continuing the war in Iraq either....
I guess you must think you get an award for the most posts? Or just being "lazyjazzer"?
Again, Bill Clinton said the same thing about WMDs 7 1/2 years after the UN inspectors were there. Bush said the same thing just a few years later, after he was in office. But you ignore it.
4,977 died; 132,000 civilians died; 32,000 wounded, and $6 TRILLION will be the ultimate cost of his lies.
Happy anniversary...
Feel free to continue to deflect about may have happened in 1998; Lee at Appomattox in 1865; Nixon in 1972, or whatever else you think will be irrelevant... but, "They did it too".... Except, "They didn't."
Obama can stay a talking head and campaign his whole time in office while the REST of office does the actual work, and not do a very good job at it either I might add.[sarcasm]Doesn't matter that Bush isn't in office, it's still his fault Fred![/sarcasm]
I've stated over the last year that we are now in over our eyes in bs over there. We can't just simply "leave" now. Multiple mistakes by MORE than one administration. Then, if things ever hit the fan with NKorea, we'll really be in a pickle, let alone if the tension finally breaks between Iran and Israel.