Rush Limbaugh: 'There Is Going To Be Gay Marriage Nationwide' (AUDIO)
Rush Limbaugh admitted on his radio show Wednesday that he thinks the nationwide legalization of gay marriage is inevitable.
Limbaugh was reacting to the Supreme Court court hearings on Prop 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act. He said that opponents of gay marriage are being told that "the country is changing and you better get with it and understand it. The genie is not getting put back in the bottle."
"And I think that's right," Limbaugh declared. "I don't care what this court does with this particular ruling, Proposition 8. I think the inertia is clearly moving in the direction that there is going to be gay marriage at some point nationwide."
If Rush says "It's TRUE!", then you guys have no choice.....
Well, there you have it "Ditto-Heads" and "Tea-Bots"... It's all over...Thus sayeth the man who is the last to see it coming, and the first to jump on it and say he "knew it all along." (His first three wives were unavailable for comment.)
Also the classic Stalinist approach to stifling disagreement......simply declare the opponent "crazy" and and with a nice dose of character assignation the Stalinist hopes the oponent will go away......worked in Mama Russia did it not.
AGAIN.....the issue with Homosexual "rights" is simply entitlements.....nothing more. SCOTUS really does get this.....the people in CAL simply do not want a continuing bloated budget that this taking will feed. SCOTUS walks and the liberal courts in CAL have a temporary win......another initiative by the people will again happen.....for sure.......this will go on for decades.
The goats name in the off-broadway play was.......Judy.....hummmm....or Sue.......no that was Johnny Cash.......memory eludes me.... :rofllol
deltamrey wrote: We always have a choice.....always.....
Yes...You do...
If you don't like abortion, don't have one...
If you don't like gay-marriage, don't marry one...
Simple...
AGAIN, this is about "EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW"...Get over it. (But I'll still give you a triple-word score if you can add "Socialist" to "Hitler" and "Stalin"...)
deltamrey wrote: ...the people in CAL simply do not want a continuing bloated budget that this taking will feed. SCOTUS walks and the liberal courts in CAL have a temporary win.....
DOMA is not about California law...It is about a federal law, that impacts over 1,100 tax, property, financial laws that treat one group of citizens differently than another group of citizens solely over a discriminatory perceived difference.
Here's the part I DON'T understand......polygamy,gay/lesbian,cousins marrying cousins (IF there are NO biological children
involved) seems like a"yawn" to me.....CONSENTING ADULTS (with a FIRM understanding of boundaries, expectations) SHOULD be LEGALLY allowed to marry and enjoy ALL legal benefits from that union......it's pretty SIMPLE in my mind.JMO
The soul RECOGNIZES another soul from another lifetime and UNDERSTANDS that the relationship (in THIS lifetime) is an
important part of evolving thru life lessons. JMO
Hitler (National Socialism) and Stalinism.....ho ho ho......samo samo....The National Socialists certainly did not embrace the Bolsheviks but used the same techniques to enslave millions anf butcher many more.
You need to do some really in depth reading......you seem to be a very light weight.......do your homework and 'moan back.
God, I love it when one of you guys is dumb enough to start in on that "National Socialism" garbage... But this thread is about DOMA & Prop-8...
So, feel free to start your lame thread about "NAZI-ism vs. National-Socialism", and I'll feel free to cram it down your throats.... for at least the 5th time.
Obviously this is not true because the "right" has never been recognized or legislated as such. Marriage has always been a restricted privilege. In this Union of ours we restrict it for siblings, close cousins, parents/children, marriages which involve more than two individuals - how can it be a "right" when so many are excluded from participation, including homosexuals?
Should the court rule as expected, what should follow shortly on that decision's heels is a challenge which restricts "marriage" to two individuals. After all, "marriage" from the perspective of any level of government is nothing more, and nothing less, than a contractual legal state. Do you really want the state to get involved in determining if there is an emotional or spiritual bond between two people? Is this the proper role of the government in anyone's opinion?
Just an interesting side note: marriage between cousins only slightly increases the risk of a child being born with a birth defect. It takes several generations of inter-breeding for recessive mutations to become commonplace. (Look at the data on Indian marriages where first-cousin marriages are not uncommon, the only recessive genetic disease that occurs at a higher frequency than neighboring countries is beta-Thallasemias, last I checked).
The taboo against inter-family marriage isn't because of the progeny, it's historically because of the difficulties caused in family alliances and social networks if those marriages break down. Back when you relied on family working together as a unit to survive, discord could be deadly.
I'd like to see pros and cons for allowing polygamy - why should or shouldn't it be permitted so those unions can receive the same benefits?
Since animals can't receive benefits like retirement, or decide medical procedures for spouses, I think it's safe to say that union can be taken off the table for needing approval.
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
Looks like Thea & Edie shouldn't have moved to such a hateful country, or found one without such onerous death taxes. :driving: 
