- Posts: 30787
- Thank you received: 179
Topic Author
GOP is just evolving like Barack...LadyJazzer wrote: Gee, it's been even more interesting to see the number of GoTBaggers who are suddenly backpedaling because they realize they're REALLY going to be on the wrong side of history, and that good ol' "rebranding of the party" isn't going to work with the LGBT crowd any more than it is with the "wetbacks"...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
chickaree wrote: :lame:
Here again, you're making shallow presumptions as to our feelings and motivations. Are you capable of not being a bigot, or is it fun for you?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
You really need to look up what neo-con means one of these days.LadyJazzer wrote:
chickaree wrote: :lame:
Here again, you're making shallow presumptions as to our feelings and motivations. Are you capable of not being a bigot, or is it fun for you?
Gee, we see that from neo-cons re: liberals every day... And this would be unusual because ____________?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote: Yeah, I should have used "paleo-con"... It probably describes most of the Randroid/sociopathic knuckle-draggers a little better, but I got lazy...
But hey, at least I know what "socialist" means...(and "Hitler"...and "Stalin"....)
pa·le·o·con·ser·va·tive (pl--kn-sûrv-tv)
adj. Informal
Extremely or stubbornly conservative in political matters.
They do not support gay marriage or abortion on demand. They do believe in the right to own and carry guns, including handguns, and they are believers in capital punishment.
Paleoconservatives believe that man's power to create is limited and that it is necessary to lean on family, traditions, heritage, religious principles and classical learning in order to gain wisdom. They are extremely critical of some neoconservatives. So many in today's world do not incorporate the aforementioned principles and so they see them as pseudo-conservatists. They assume a position of anti-Federalism in that they are concerned with small, decentralized government and the sacredness of private property.
No one ever accused conservatives of going in a clockwise direction...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
(No way in Tartarus I'll EVER look up anything so DUMB)LadyJazzer wrote: Look up the word... There's at least 30 pages of definitions from different sources....
You don't like my sources? :rofllol
You don't like my word? :rofllol
...then don't use it...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
True but I have to say that this paragraph resonatedThe gay marriage issue is contentious not just because of the subject itself, but because it exposes the ridiculous contradictions in what passes for political, social and moral debate in today’s society.
because why is it okay to subsidize education, housing, and birth control if all it serves is to make us all more indebted and subservient? I understand that the intentions are to give us a boost so we can better ourselves, but I'm having trouble seeing that it's not leading to more entitlement which I think is a more insidious problem than whether two gays can marry.Put bluntly, a leftist's view of the world is one in which you freely engage in sex with your partner, while the house, the bed, and the birth control are all subsidized by the government -- or by yourself, if you happen to make $250,000 or more a year (in which case you'll be paying for others' homes, beds and birth control a well as your own). I'd hardly call this liberty.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.