Gun linked to CO prison chief slaying leads to womans arrest

28 Mar 2013 16:54 #21 by LadyJazzer

FredHayek wrote: I thought it was 5 out of 7? Lost on concealed carry on campus and suing manufacturers and distributers.


Since they were pulled, I didn't lose. How's that 5 for 5 workin' for ya?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Mar 2013 16:56 #22 by LadyJazzer

FredHayek wrote: And if she is going to go there, Coffman re-elected despite her best efforts. And Gardener and the other Republican Colorado Congressman proved that Obama's coat tails were very short despite huge amounts of Dem funds sent to the batleground state.


Coffman is no longer my problem, and I wasn't working in the campaign to defeat him...if you want to go there.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Mar 2013 18:09 #23 by Green Mountain Guns
Outfall of stupid new guns laws so far; loss of money making manufacturer and probably its local raw material suppliers (hundreds of employees, 10s of millions in revenues), people cancelling hunting trips to Colorado (a 1.8 billion dollar state industry, probably losses to the state of 100s of millions in revenue), cancelled program that gives state free advertising on the Outdoor Channel (unknown negative economic impact, but will contribute to those already listed). These are just the first few brought to you by the business friendly Gov. and the majority of freedom hating Democrats in our state. When your Obamacare increases exceed 30 to 40% premium increases, their plan to make nearly all of us poor, seems to be working well.
There are 64 counties in our state with 62 sheriffs as the highest form of law enforcement and they unanamously agree the new laws are a violation of our constitution and unenforcable due to imbecils writing laws without any knowledge of how things work. The burden of proof lies with law enforcement, not the magazine owner.
Feel good laws that solve nothing, but cost our state 100s of millions.
The time for law suits, recall elections, etc. are here.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Mar 2013 18:17 #24 by deltamrey
NOW, given the receiver is DEAD....this loop is open. Her defense is probably he stole the gun......can the authorities prove otherwise ??

This is a good test.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Mar 2013 18:21 #25 by Rick

Green Mountain Guns wrote: Outfall of stupid new guns laws so far; loss of money making manufacturer and probably its local raw material suppliers (hundreds of employees, 10s of millions in revenues), people cancelling hunting trips to Colorado (a 1.8 billion dollar state industry, probably losses to the state of 100s of millions in revenue), cancelled program that gives state free advertising on the Outdoor Channel (unknown negative economic impact, but will contribute to those already listed). These are just the first few brought to you by the business friendly Gov. and the majority of freedom hating Democrats in our state. When your Obamacare increases exceed 30 to 40% premium increases, their plan to make nearly all of us poor, seems to be working well.
There are 64 counties in our state with 62 sheriffs as the highest form of law enforcement and they unanamously agree the new laws are a violation of our constitution and unenforcable due to imbecils writing laws without any knowledge of how things work. The burden of proof lies with law enforcement, not the magazine owner.
Feel good laws that solve nothing, but cost our state 100s of millions.
The time for law suits, recall elections, etc. are here.

:like: The real question is, are there enough voters in Colorado who understand the ramifications of these stupid laws? Will our media inform the uninformed? I doubt it.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Mar 2013 18:45 #26 by FredHayek
A gunsmith called into KOA today to explain how stupid the magazine ban is in his line of work. If you bring in your malfunctioning gun you can't include the magazine to help diagnose the problem. And many times the magazine is the issue.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Mar 2013 20:05 #27 by deltamrey
Because magazines are not serialized......and date of fab not linked......what......silliness E100000. In addition once serialized.....if ever, the numbers can easily be ground away......the police certainly have better things to deal with....if not we need to cut the forces back.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Mar 2013 20:27 #28 by Nobody that matters

LadyJazzer wrote:

FredHayek wrote: I thought it was 5 out of 7? Lost on concealed carry on campus and suing manufacturers and distributers.


Since they were pulled, I didn't lose. How's that 5 for 5 workin' for ya?


They were pulled because they didn't stand a chance of passing. Count it any way you want, you still don't have two of your feel-good-do-nothing-unenforceable laws on the books.

"Whatever you are, be a good one." ~ Abraham Lincoln

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Mar 2013 10:45 #29 by Grady

deltamrey wrote: NOW, given the receiver is DEAD....this loop is open. Her defense is probably he stole the gun......can the authorities prove otherwise ??

This is a good test.


I think they will be able to prove this was a straw purchase. She needs to spend a very long time behind bars. Did she report her newly purchased firearm stolen?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

29 Mar 2013 10:47 #30 by Grady

Nobody that matters wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote:

FredHayek wrote: I thought it was 5 out of 7? Lost on concealed carry on campus and suing manufacturers and distributers.


Since they were pulled, I didn't lose. How's that 5 for 5 workin' for ya?


They were pulled because they didn't stand a chance of passing. Count it any way you want, you still don't have two of your feel-good-do-nothing-unenforceable laws on the books.

Several of the others that were passed will face a pretty stiff constitutional test. You have to wonder what were the Governor and some of the other dems promised in back room deals with the Obama administration.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.150 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+