Boston on Lockdown

20 Apr 2013 08:41 #21 by archer
Replied by archer on topic Boston on Lockdown
Would this be any different than the Boston area shut down by a major snow storm?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Apr 2013 08:56 #22 by Blazer Bob
Replied by Blazer Bob on topic Boston on Lockdown

archer wrote: Would this be any different than the Boston area shut down by a major snow storm?



None at all except that one is caused by Mother Nature and the other is caused by religious fanatics who want to kill us all.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Apr 2013 09:36 #23 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic Boston on Lockdown

archer wrote: Would this be any different than the Boston area shut down by a major snow storm?


One is caused by nature and the other is imposed by goverment. But if you don't see a difference...

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Apr 2013 09:49 #24 by archer
Replied by archer on topic Boston on Lockdown
My post was a response to the $335 million cost for the lock down, sorry i didn't make that clear. Would the cost be the same with a snow storm shutdown? How do they even figure a cost for this? I believe they did what they had to do and have no issue with the lock down.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Apr 2013 09:51 #25 by Arlen
Replied by Arlen on topic Boston on Lockdown
I will bet all my worldly goods that each adult person, hiding within their house, searched for a crude weapon for self defense ( baseball bat, rake, hoe, fireplace poker, etc.). Wouldn't it be much wiser to have a sophisticated weapon, such as a handgun or AR-15?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Apr 2013 09:52 #26 by Pony Soldier
Replied by Pony Soldier on topic Boston on Lockdown
I doubt the cost is really that high. If you needed milk, you will just buy it one day later.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Apr 2013 09:55 #27 by Arlen
Replied by Arlen on topic Boston on Lockdown
The lockdown was a voluntary request to the populace. It was not martial law. It was not enforced by law or force.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Apr 2013 10:02 #28 by archer
Replied by archer on topic Boston on Lockdown

Arlen wrote: The lockdown was a voluntary request to the populace. It was not martial law. It was not enforced by law or force.

No one claimed it was.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Apr 2013 13:16 #29 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic Boston on Lockdown

towermonkey wrote: I doubt the cost is really that high. If you needed milk, you will just buy it one day later.


:smackshead:
People flying in for business? Amtrak shut down for the whole corridor? Mobilizing all those men and equipment. All the sales that are lost. I think the figures are accurate for a metro area of 2 million people. $250 per person makes sense. Imagine all those cabbies, day laborers, restaurant workers who didn't get paid that day? I work for a company that supplies dialysis clinics. Those patients have to get treated every two to three days. If we had been closed, how many orders wouldn't go out? Or would have to now ship overnight instead of ground?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

20 Apr 2013 13:42 #30 by LadyJazzer
Replied by LadyJazzer on topic Boston on Lockdown
Since we know that law-enforcement would not have prevented anyone from needed medical treatment...(or prevented any medically-necessary clinics from being able to open), yet one more "hypothetical red-herring" goes down the tubes...

Eeeeek! :smackshead:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.162 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+