Liberals riot in Seattle - May Day

03 May 2013 21:52 #1 by Arlen
Did I miss the thread about the May Day riots by liberals in Seattle? Would TEA party members carry on in such a manner?

Wednesday was May Day — that favorite day of the year when the oppressed workers of the world cast off their chains (riot) and stand up for human dignity (vandalize stuff).
..................
In Seattle, Washington, Wednesday night, the hipster armies streamed from the coffee shops and college classrooms, rising up against the city’s bourgeois Prius owners and smashing the fascist bicycle cops.

Here are just a few of the ways they liberated America:

Wednesday afternoon, the freedom fighters smashed racism and censorship, attacking an Asian-American reporter and his cameraman who, no doubt, were trying to undermine the street protests by bringing attention to them — something these folks definitely don’t crave. The people then attempted to strike a blow to the Man, trying to wrestle a camera from a working-class traitor to return it to the People.


http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/03/bedford-may-day-bros-centuries-of-dancing-marching-and-rioting/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 May 2013 06:25 - 23 Jan 2017 11:36 #2 by Reverend Revelant
Er... yes you did miss it...

"May Day protests grows rowdy - Not Tea Party Members"

mymountaintown.com/forum/6-the-courthous...ot-tea-party-members

But the thread died because the mouthy liberals had nothing to say on the subject. Figures.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 May 2013 07:04 #3 by ScienceChic
I'm sorry, but it doesn't say anywhere that we have to reply to everything, and I can certainly understand why many wouldn't with that insulting and dismissive tone taken. It sounds like all you want to do is condemn anyone who would support them, not have a dialog.

I myself don't agree with violent actions taken in a protest movement, but I support the Occupy movement 100% - we all recognize that this country is ill and they are at least trying to do something to make it better. And maybe all of their ideas aren't good ones, but a large number of them are. Rather than outright dismiss them, why not have a discussion on the merits of their stands? It's exactly what many on the left did automatically with the Tea Party movement, even though it's the same thing - they see that the country is ill and they have ideas for making it better, and some are good and some are bad, but rather than dismissing them outright, why not discuss the merits of their positions as well?

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 May 2013 07:39 #4 by Reverend Revelant

Science Chic wrote: I'm sorry, but it doesn't say anywhere that we have to reply to everything, and I can certainly understand why many wouldn't with that insulting and dismissive tone taken. It sounds like all you want to do is condemn anyone who would support them, not have a dialog.

I myself don't agree with violent actions taken in a protest movement, but I support the Occupy movement 100% - we all recognize that this country is ill and they are at least trying to do something to make it better. And maybe all of their ideas aren't good ones, but a large number of them are. Rather than outright dismiss them, why not have a discussion on the merits of their stands? It's exactly what many on the left did automatically with the Tea Party movement, even though it's the same thing - they see that the country is ill and they have ideas for making it better, and some are good and some are bad, but rather than dismissing them outright, why not discuss the merits of their positions as well?


I don't agree with anarchists in any form or sort... so there is no conversation needed there. That's like listening to the Nazi Brownshirts and supporting their methods in the early 30's just because Hitler promised free health care to everyone. Free health care... maybe had merit... the Nazi movement... not so good an idea.

And the Tea Party is not the same in any sense of the word. Occupy tries to get a point across by protesting, violence, rape, crimes, destruction of private and public property, attempts to go above and beyond the rule of law and I could go on and on. The Tea Party methods is to rally people behind a political process, not a destructive process.

That's what happens when you approach an issue with relative moralism and cognitive dissonance... both have infected your way of thinking logically and rationally.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 May 2013 11:56 #5 by Rick
SC, TLGT is just making a great point. When the tea party movement started, they were automatically condemned as being racist and prone to violence by many people in the media and one or two brain dead people on this site. Then came OWS which most of the media (and Obama) was behind, even in the face of actual violence, filth, obstruction to businesses, riots, rape, and just a general annoyance to the public. I'm not saying all OWSrs are doing this, but it's certainly much more common than the handful of tea party people that held up a racist or stupid sign.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 May 2013 12:27 #6 by archer

Rick wrote: SC, TLGT is just making a great point. When the tea party movement started, they were automatically condemned as being racist and prone to violence by many people in the media and one or two brain dead people on this site. Then came OWS which most of the media (and Obama) was behind, even in the face of actual violence, filth, obstruction to businesses, riots, rape, and just a general annoyance to the public. I'm not saying all OWSrs are doing this, but it's certainly much more common than the handful of tea party people that held up a racist or stupid sign.

Just Google tea party violence Rick, its more prevelent than you think. And it isn't just holding up nasty signs.... Its physical violence too.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 May 2013 13:24 #7 by Reverend Revelant

archer wrote:

Rick wrote: SC, TLGT is just making a great point. When the tea party movement started, they were automatically condemned as being racist and prone to violence by many people in the media and one or two brain dead people on this site. Then came OWS which most of the media (and Obama) was behind, even in the face of actual violence, filth, obstruction to businesses, riots, rape, and just a general annoyance to the public. I'm not saying all OWSrs are doing this, but it's certainly much more common than the handful of tea party people that held up a racist or stupid sign.

Just Google tea party violence Rick, its more prevelent than you think. And it isn't just holding up nasty signs.... Its physical violence too.


I'll hold up any Tea Party anomalies to the bullsh*t coming from the Occupy movement and the activist left. Ya want to go tit-for-tat on that?

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 May 2013 09:22 #8 by Photo-fish

Science Chic wrote: It sounds like all you want to do is condemn anyone who would support them, not have a dialog.


BINGO! :yeahthat:

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 May 2013 09:28 #9 by FredHayek

archer wrote:

Rick wrote: SC, TLGT is just making a great point. When the tea party movement started, they were automatically condemned as being racist and prone to violence by many people in the media and one or two brain dead people on this site. Then came OWS which most of the media (and Obama) was behind, even in the face of actual violence, filth, obstruction to businesses, riots, rape, and just a general annoyance to the public. I'm not saying all OWSrs are doing this, but it's certainly much more common than the handful of tea party people that held up a racist or stupid sign.

Just Google tea party violence Rick, its more prevelent than you think. And it isn't just holding up nasty signs.... Its physical violence too.


Just a few a-holes ruining a peaceful demonstration right? Just like the shootings at the 4/20 party. People want to shut down the event because of one bad guy. Would you shut down Fourth of July celebrations because of a knifing?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 May 2013 11:37 #10 by LadyJazzer

archer wrote: Just Google "tea party violence" Rick, its more prevalent than you think. And it isn't just holding up nasty signs.... Its physical violence too.



Wow... You're right... Pages and pages of it... Hmmmmmm

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.182 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+