Rick wrote: Ok archer, I gave you at least 20 of 33 in that list that are pretty universally true for liberals. Tell me how many on LJ's list are universally true for conservatives. And which ones put conservatives in anything but a BAD light. Not one on the liberal list was meant to define liberals as bad, while EVERY one on LJ's list was meant to just that.
Don't you see the difference? It doesn't matter to me other than I just can't understand your thinking... I expect that from LJ, but I always have some hope for you.
Apparently it does matter to you....sorry, I have no wish to play this game with you.....I thought the liberal LIST was amusing/funny.....I thought the conservative lists were amusing/funny......end of story.....you can continue to twist that however you want to make your point, but you can do it without me.
"Greenwald told Business Insider late Tuesday night that he thinks some left-leaning members of the media — such as Time magazine's Joe Klein and The New Yorker's Jeffrey Toobin — have shifted stances on surveillance and civil liberties for "principle-free, hackish, and opportunistic" reasons.
"I'm not surprised," Greenwald said in an email. "I've been amazed and disappointed for a long time at how the most slavishly partisan media Democrats who pretended to care so much about these issues when doing so helped undermine George Bush are now the loudest apologists and cheerleaders for these very same policies. …
"To call them principle-free, hackish, and opportunistic is to be overly generous."
Greenwald is an authentic left-wing civil rights liberal. Much of the rest of the media are nothing more than partisan leftists driven by hate, not principle. "
Following up with what Blazer said it is interesting to see which on the liberal media actually care about the 4th amendment and which continue to defend Dems no matter what.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
