Hickenlooper and Dems put Colorado ahead of the curve

26 Jun 2013 09:06 #11 by LadyJazzer
Really?...He is "one of Team Obama's Members"?.... Does that mean he's a guy from Harvard that supports the President?

I guess that makes ME "one of Team Obama's Members"?....

Nice try, Fred... Let me know when you have a source that

FredHayek wrote: Even today one of Team Obama's members declared there needs to be a war on coal.


I always love your fact-free un-sourced drivel....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Jun 2013 09:22 #12 by FredHayek
He works for the President. But you already knew that.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Jun 2013 09:33 #13 by LadyJazzer
And you still don't have a source for a "Team Obama Member" saying "war on coal"...But you already knew that.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Jun 2013 10:01 #14 by FredHayek
New York Times interview isn't a source?

OK, LJ believes Obama wants to build more coal plants and convert more natural gas facilities to coal. Or did you miss his speech yesterday?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Jun 2013 10:07 #16 by Blazer Bob

LadyJazzer wrote: And you still don't have a source for a "Team Obama Member" saying "war on coal"...But you already knew that.



So you are saying if he had declared a war on coal that would be a bad thing. Got it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Jun 2013 10:07 #17 by Reverend Revelant

FredHayek wrote: New York Times interview isn't a source?

OK, LJ believes Obama wants to build more coal plants and convert more natural gas facilities to coal. Or did you miss his speech yesterday?


Fred... Obama never used the words "war on coal" and you know that.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Jun 2013 10:08 #18 by Reverend Revelant

Blazer Bob wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: And you still don't have a source for a "Team Obama Member" saying "war on coal"...But you already knew that.



So you are saying if he had declared a war on coal that would be a bad thing. Got it.


Bob... she's splitting hairs and you know it. And she's right... Obama or his "team" never used the words "war on coal."

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Jun 2013 10:23 #19 by Mary Scott

Walter L Newton wrote:

Blazer Bob wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: And you still don't have a source for a "Team Obama Member" saying "war on coal"...But you already knew that.



So you are saying if he had declared a war on coal that would be a bad thing. Got it.


Bob... she's splitting hairs and you know it. And she's right... Obama or his "team" never used the words "war on coal."

She is only arguing the attribution of the phrase, not the content.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

26 Jun 2013 10:25 #20 by Reverend Revelant

Mary Scott wrote:

Walter L Newton wrote:

Blazer Bob wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: And you still don't have a source for a "Team Obama Member" saying "war on coal"...But you already knew that.



So you are saying if he had declared a war on coal that would be a bad thing. Got it.


Bob... she's splitting hairs and you know it. And she's right... Obama or his "team" never used the words "war on coal."

She is only arguing the attribution of the phrase, not the content.


Correct... which is her way to deflect from the actual substance of the topic. And some fall for it all the time.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.158 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+