FredHayek wrote: And now the Denver Post in a front page story says the Colorado version is also having issues.
And Fred, can you give us a little more insight to your statement?
You know what Fred, in my opinion, you're little hit and run drop in's and anecdotal pronouncements do not add very much to the information or the discussions of a thread topic.
And then you go round and round with people like Lady Jazzer which only amounts to totally deriding and deflecting the topic at hand.
How about some links, how about some discussion that moves a topic forward, how about not ruining a thread.
Think about it.
(And yes folks, this is the totally crappy Walter which sometimes comes out on these forums, and I already fully realize that before you waste your time pointing it out.)
Have to agree with Walter Fred. While I agree with you on most issues, I can't respond to most of your posts because I'm not sure if your posts are from actual sources of from a dream you had last night. I know it saves you time by leaving out the source link, but it makes us waste time if we actually want to agree with you... we have to search for the source or end up looking stupid for agreeing with your imagination.
Copying a link just takes a couple clicks and it really give threads a chance to develop (instead of getting derailed by archer and LJ mocking you). I know you used to post sources, not sure what happened that you no longer do.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
I dunno, Fred said it was a Denver Post front page story. I just looked and saw it. Maybe I'm the only one with a bookmark to the Denver Post? I agree links are convenient in other cases for hard to find stories. Personally I won't quote the D Post articles anymore after hearing about them going after bloggers in the past for Fair use violations. Just not worth the risk.
FredHayek wrote: Denver Post front page isn't a good source?
It's not that it's a bad source, it's that if we want to see the source, we have to jump into a browser and start looking. If there is a link, it's just an easy click and I'm there to discuss your point. I'd really like to agree with you once in a while but your points aren't imortant enough for me to search the net every time. Sorry.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
This sounds confusing, has anyone run into this trying to use the Colorado Exchange? They are requiring a 12 page medicaid application first and then make you wait for a medicaid rejection before you can use the exchange plans? Something sounds not right about that, especially if you are not interested in Medicaid anyway. ???
LOL wrote: This sounds confusing, has anyone run into this trying to use the Colorado Exchange? They are requiring a 12 page medicaid application first and then make you wait for a medicaid rejection before you can use the exchange plans? Something sounds not right about that, especially if you are not interested in Medicaid anyway. ???
Doesn't sound confusing to me at all. The Colorado health care web site is f'up, the application process and the requirements are f'up and the citizens of Colorado are as f'ed as the people who are f'ed trying to apply on the federal website.
Ahhhhhh...Cakes has "fixed " the Canadian software......so kiddies sign up.....Cakes needs about THREE MILLION healthy kids to sign up to pay part of the care for the freeloaders...as in SS the bloated fed budget will also slime several BILLION into MEDICAID to pay for illegal alien free medical care......kiddies how does that work for ya ?? IF you do not join the clusterf**k, you will pay via IRS $95 a year or 1% of your income......will be fun. Now kiddies if you can multiply, 3MKIDDIES X $100 =.....yes indeed $300,000,000 $.....that goes into the BLACK hole of WDC.....what a great future.
VOTE out both CO Senators that gave you your futures......
Does it seem like to anyone else that life is getting more and more complicated every year?
Computers and other devices were supposed to make life easier, but it just seems like it enables government and businesses to actually make it more difficult.
One of my daily tasks is enforcing Sarbanes Oxley with both the home office and out of state branches and it is work but it just doesn't feel very productive or that it is preventing any real fraud. I can just imagine all the complications the federal and state bureaus are adding to ACA every week.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.