- Posts: 7163
- Thank you received: 21
fly off the handle wrote:
I dont have to explain anything to you, asshat, shove it!FredHayek wrote:
fly off the handle wrote: You crack me up. You fought a gov option, so they bent over to protect private interests.
now you complain that it is a convoluted mess.
as usual take no responsibility for your destructive actions.
Private insurance and private tech companies built it , not gov.
hypocrites
So you think government programmers would have done a better job? :pop
Please explain and show your work.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Walter L Newton wrote:
fly off the handle wrote: You crack me up. You fought a gov option, so they bent over to protect private interests.
now you complain that it is a convoluted mess.
as usual take no responsibility for your destructive actions.
Private insurance and private tech companies built it , not gov.
you crazies were so scared of "socialized medicine" that it turned into this mess.
if we just let people buy into medicare, the site works perfectly, we would be ahead instead of behind.
hypocrites
You evidently have no idea of what you speak...
I never worked for the gov. Unlike you. I was an entrepreneur, that said, if we just took advantage of the existing infrastructure of medicare this would not be an issue, you cranks insisted that gov option would not happen. Now you gloat.
again hypocrisy of the loons.
The most clear data comes from a U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report from June (pdf), which states that the U.S. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) spent “almost $394 million from fiscal year 2010 through March 2013 through contracts” to build the “federally facilitated exchanges” (FFEs) – the complex system that includes Healthcare.gov as well as certain state-based exchanges – the data hub, and other expenditures related to the Obamacare exchange system.
http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/ob ... site-cost/
Who do you think managed the 55 or more contractors for this project? Who do you think had final sign off on the readiness of the project?
Because the government provides brief, partial descriptions of contracts in USASpending.gov, it is not possible to say which of the contractors with information technology contracts or project management contacts were involved in building the 36 federally run health insurance marketplaces, a responsibility tasked to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, known by the acronym CMS, or those assigned to develop the federal data hub, which would allow applicants to have their income and family size immediately verified by the Internal Revenue Service.
http://reporting.sunlightfoundation.com ... ntractors/
You've obviously not worked for the federal government on a Information Technology project (I did for 15 years as a programmer) and you really have no clue as to how difficult it is for a contractor to simply do what they know how to do best, especially when you have multiple federal agencies running the show.
You comment are great for the low-information public. In that capacity you've down a wonderful job.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
System glich, wow a private company has an issue!Walter L Newton wrote: Thanks for repeating my comment to you.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
fly off the handle wrote:
System glich, wow a private company has an issue!Walter L Newton wrote: Thanks for repeating my comment to you.
if you right people would not have diluted the ACA. It could have been an easy roll out. The medicare site works fine, cry babies like you forced a new system. None was needed, just let people buy medicare.
Keeping the power with the corporations is what caused this problem.
compromise with the looney right made this mess.
Own it, hope you are satisfied
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Walter L Newton wrote:
fly off the handle wrote:
System glich, wow a private company has an issue!Walter L Newton wrote: Thanks for repeating my comment to you.
if you right people would not have diluted the ACA. It could have been an easy roll out. The medicare site works fine, cry babies like you forced a new system. None was needed, just let people buy medicare.
Keeping the power with the corporations is what caused this problem.
compromise with the looney right made this mess.
Own it, hope you are satisfied
Hey look... the GOP didn't make the deals with the insurance companies and Big Pharma. The Obama administration did. How conveniently you forget. You own it and it's getting a quite bit hot in the kitchen... isn't it?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
You are too stupid for a serious response, see Walt.FredHayek wrote: Yep, no Republicans signed onto this horrible hybrid. Just the Dems who like the corporate donations. Your party was sold to the highest bidder, and Big Pharma and Big Healthcare spend a lot on lobbying.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
fly off the handle wrote:
You are too stupid for a serious response, see Walt.FredHayek wrote: Yep, no Republicans signed onto this horrible hybrid. Just the Dems who like the corporate donations. Your party was sold to the highest bidder, and Big Pharma and Big Healthcare spend a lot on lobbying.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
No, lies and misrepresentation is all you losers have left.Walter L Newton wrote:
fly off the handle wrote:
You are too stupid for a serious response, see Walt.FredHayek wrote: Yep, no Republicans signed onto this horrible hybrid. Just the Dems who like the corporate donations. Your party was sold to the highest bidder, and Big Pharma and Big Healthcare spend a lot on lobbying.
Insults are all you have left.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.