- Posts: 2836
- Thank you received: 25
LadyJazzer wrote: So, in other words YOU are nitpicking about context, instead of what you actually wrote... Got it.
I don't give a sh*t what you were "responding to"....I can read just fine. You wrote what you wrote, and I threw it back at you and asked for more clarification.
I also don't care if you liked the picture, or what it referred to... I don't need your approval for what I post, and if you don't like it, you don't have to comment. You can shut up and let it pass.
You wanna keep this up?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
pineinthegrass wrote:
LadyJazzer wrote: So, in other words YOU are nitpicking about context, instead of what you actually wrote... Got it.
I don't give a sh*t what you were "responding to"....I can read just fine. You wrote what you wrote, and I threw it back at you and asked for more clarification.
I also don't care if you liked the picture, or what it referred to... I don't need your approval for what I post, and if you don't like it, you don't have to comment. You can shut up and let it pass.
You wanna keep this up?
Look, you compared some kids to Hitler Youth with nothing to support it other than a photo taken in a fraction of a second.
Your only argument is that I asked a question in response to archer using the word she used; "impose"? Are you kidding? You look pitiful if that is your case. And I gave plenty of clarification, not that I needed to, nor did you apparently read it.
How about clarifying your original post? Just keep diverting...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Oh spare me archer. How is this different from LJ's misleading image? I'm just contributing to LJ's dumpster.archer wrote: Thanks Rick, that's exactly what I was referring to in my earlier post....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Reverend Revelant wrote: Even the AP admitted that their photo was not representative of what the boys were doing at the moment. And they've issue a retraction.
But any shiny object for LJ to run with is fine for our resident bigot.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Get over your LJ fixation rick, if you had read my post it was not about LJ but about the hypocrisy of being outraged by the picture she posted but not the type of picture you posted.Rick wrote:
Oh spare me archer. How is this different from LJ's misleading image? I'm just contributing to LJ's dumpster.archer wrote: Thanks Rick, that's exactly what I was referring to in my earlier post....
You really need to take up another hobby other than constantly defending LJ's garbage. Do you believe LJ's picture means what she is saying it means?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Do you like her post, yes or no?archer wrote:
Get over your LJ fixation rick, if you had read my post it was not about LJ but about the hypocrisy of being outraged by the picture she posted but not the type of picture you posted.Rick wrote:
Oh spare me archer. How is this different from LJ's misleading image? I'm just contributing to LJ's dumpster.archer wrote: Thanks Rick, that's exactly what I was referring to in my earlier post....
You really need to take up another hobby other than constantly defending LJ's garbage. Do you believe LJ's picture means what she is saying it means?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.