The New "More Moral" Boy Scouts...

06 Mar 2014 22:23 #31 by pineinthegrass

LadyJazzer wrote: So, in other words YOU are nitpicking about context, instead of what you actually wrote... Got it.

I don't give a sh*t what you were "responding to"....I can read just fine. You wrote what you wrote, and I threw it back at you and asked for more clarification.

I also don't care if you liked the picture, or what it referred to... I don't need your approval for what I post, and if you don't like it, you don't have to comment. You can shut up and let it pass.

You wanna keep this up?


Look, you compared some kids to Hitler Youth with nothing to support it other than a photo taken in a fraction of a second.

Your only argument is that I asked a question in response to archer using the word she used; "impose"? Are you kidding? You look pitiful if that is your case. And I gave plenty of clarification, not that I needed to, nor did you apparently read it.

How about clarifying your original post? Just keep diverting...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Mar 2014 06:48 #32 by Reverend Revelant

pineinthegrass wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: So, in other words YOU are nitpicking about context, instead of what you actually wrote... Got it.

I don't give a sh*t what you were "responding to"....I can read just fine. You wrote what you wrote, and I threw it back at you and asked for more clarification.

I also don't care if you liked the picture, or what it referred to... I don't need your approval for what I post, and if you don't like it, you don't have to comment. You can shut up and let it pass.

You wanna keep this up?


Look, you compared some kids to Hitler Youth with nothing to support it other than a photo taken in a fraction of a second.

Your only argument is that I asked a question in response to archer using the word she used; "impose"? Are you kidding? You look pitiful if that is your case. And I gave plenty of clarification, not that I needed to, nor did you apparently read it.

How about clarifying your original post? Just keep diverting...


Even the AP admitted that their photo was not representative of what the boys were doing at the moment. And they've issue a retraction.

But any shiny object for LJ to run with is fine for our resident bigot.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Mar 2014 07:25 #33 by Rick

I figured this thread needed some racial diversity.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Mar 2014 08:01 #34 by archer
Thanks Rick, that's exactly what I was referring to in my earlier post....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Mar 2014 08:09 #35 by Rick

archer wrote: Thanks Rick, that's exactly what I was referring to in my earlier post....

Oh spare me archer. How is this different from LJ's misleading image? I'm just contributing to LJ's dumpster.

You really need to take up another hobby other than constantly defending LJ's garbage. Do you believe LJ's picture means what she is saying it means?

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Mar 2014 08:34 #36 by Nobody that matters

Reverend Revelant wrote: Even the AP admitted that their photo was not representative of what the boys were doing at the moment. And they've issue a retraction.

But any shiny object for LJ to run with is fine for our resident bigot.


<Insert standard LJ "I think the way I think because the teabaggers did it first" reply>

"Whatever you are, be a good one." ~ Abraham Lincoln

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Mar 2014 08:54 #37 by archer

Rick wrote:

archer wrote: Thanks Rick, that's exactly what I was referring to in my earlier post....

Oh spare me archer. How is this different from LJ's misleading image? I'm just contributing to LJ's dumpster.

You really need to take up another hobby other than constantly defending LJ's garbage. Do you believe LJ's picture means what she is saying it means?

Get over your LJ fixation rick, if you had read my post it was not about LJ but about the hypocrisy of being outraged by the picture she posted but not the type of picture you posted.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Mar 2014 09:22 #38 by Rick

archer wrote:

Rick wrote:

archer wrote: Thanks Rick, that's exactly what I was referring to in my earlier post....

Oh spare me archer. How is this different from LJ's misleading image? I'm just contributing to LJ's dumpster.

You really need to take up another hobby other than constantly defending LJ's garbage. Do you believe LJ's picture means what she is saying it means?

Get over your LJ fixation rick, if you had read my post it was not about LJ but about the hypocrisy of being outraged by the picture she posted but not the type of picture you posted.

Do you like her post, yes or no?

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Mar 2014 09:56 #39 by archer
Well, let me see. She posted her opinion of a photo that was online, she also posted the explanation given about that photo explaining that it was taken out of context. Now in my mind she did exactly what she should do.And far more than some conservatives have done when posting pictures of Obama out of context. So yeah, I have no problem with her post.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Mar 2014 10:11 #40 by Blazer Bob
:rofllol :rofllol :rofllol


[youtube:2f64uf7p]
[/youtube:2f64uf7p]

I now return you to your regularly scheduled programing.

:letsfight:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.194 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+