Questions the Left or Right Refuse to Answer...

Post a question in this thread asking the right or the left a question that you know will not be answered.

I'll start with an easy one.

In the Russia investigation where the FBI went to the FISA courts to get a warrant to spy on Carter Page, were the FISA judges informed that the Steele dossier (used as evidence to get the warrant) was unverified and was paid for by the Clinton campaign?

Rick wrote: Post a question in this thread asking the right or the left a question that you know will not be answered.

I'll start with an easy one.

In the Russia investigation where the FBI went to the FISA courts to get a warrant to spy on Carter Page, were the FISA judges informed that the Steele dossier (used as evidence to get the warrant) was unverified and was paid for by the Clinton campaign?

www.factcheck.org/2019/03/dossier-not-what-started-all-of-this/ EASY PEASY
EVIDENCE...…..

Whadda cop out... not even close to answering the question.

So stupid, in so many ways. First, how could anyone here no what happened in a FISA court? Second, why would the judges be told something that's a load of garbage that the right-wing lie machine peddles to their mindless sheep?

www.vox.com/2019/3/22/18277089/fox-news-...lie-trump-witch-hunt

Both of you please try and improve your reading comprehension at least a bit. The OP asks:

In the Russia investigation where the FBI went to the FISA courts to get a warrant to spy on Carter Page, were the FISA judges informed that the Steele dossier (used as evidence to get the warrant) was unverified and was paid for by the Clinton campaign?

It said nothing about origins of the investigation. Are you trying to make the case that the Steele Dossier was not used to obtain a FISA warrant on Carter Page?

"The so-called dossier formed only a smart part of the evidence used to meet the legal burden of establishing "probable cause" that Page was an agent of Russia...

National security experts who have reviewed the document say that even the parts that aren't blacked out contain more than enough information to provide a judge reason to rule that the FBI had probable cause to believe that Page was an agent of Russia..."

www.nbcnews.com/news/crime-courts/why-te...cret-warrant-n893666

So, you are refusing to answer the question. Got it.

towermonkey wrote: So, you are refusing to answer the question. Got it.

thehill.com/opinion/white-house/420408-c...r-after-fisa-warrant

Would THIS be what you are referencing ??? Authored by an award winning investigative reporter...…..seems to me that MANY errors were made on BOTH sides……..jmo

I answered the question by providing you links demonstrating that the dossier did not instigate the counterintelligence investigation of your idiot king and that it was not the sole source of the warrant regarding Carter Page.

Your problem is that these are not the answers you wanted. You probably wanted a chorus of sheeplike bleats of "no collusion, no obstruction!"

My problem is that you didn't answer the question that was asked. As usual.