towermonkey wrote: There are no easy yes or nos to the braindead...
I disagree. The answers to most political questions are pretty easy if the person answering intends to be honest and doesn't care if it hurts his or her political ideology or a politician he or she favors. Certain people on these forums are just here to be confrontational and have no desire to debate the issues. I can certainly be confrontational, but I'm also willing to debate the points I make and don't have to back them up with pages of opinions from people who call themselves journalists.
I hope this thread doesn't prove my point but I'm pretty sure it will.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
Rick wrote: You didn't answer the question. I didn't ask if he would be indicted, I asked if that would be considered obstruction of justice and would that be a big deal to you. It's an easy yes or no on both.
Moronic. Apparently saying that I considered it obstruction of justice and that a sitting President could not be indicted was somehow not clear enough for you.
Rick wrote: The answers to most political questions are pretty easy...
Sort of like "would that be considered obstruction of justice" and "it sounds like obstruction of justice"?
Rick wrote: ...if the person answering intends to be honest and doesn't care if it hurts his or her political ideology or a politician he or she favors.
And there we have it, for those to whom this was not obvious. The premise of this thread is based on projection. Your questions are weird little wannabe gotchas. You're assuming that because trump's chumps are hypocritical, amoral tools that everyone else is as well. It isn't so.
Moronic. Apparently saying that I considered it obstruction of justice and that a sitting President could not be indicted was somehow not clear enough for you.
You said "it sounds like your hypothetical involves obstruction of justice"
Sorry, that's not clear at all. You didn't say you believed deleting 33,000 emails was an obstruction of justice. Why act like a politician? Why not just say it would or would not be obstruction? Sheesh
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
Just like with your first wannabe gotcha, you got an answer. But because it wasn't worded exactly how you wanted, you think it's not an answer. Try to develop some mental flexibility, it'll help you out if you ever have to deal with other people.
Here's another one that I won't get a direct answer to.
If all women are to be believed when it comes to claims of sexual assault, why is Justin Fairfax still holding his job and why has the media completely dropped this story? I could also ask the same question about the two blackface bozos but I think the assault accusation is a lot more serious. I believe the answer can be found by looking at the letter before their names.... the letter is a D.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
Would THIS be what you are referencing ??? Authored by an award winning investigative reporter...…..seems to me that MANY errors were made on BOTH sides……..jmo
I have ATTEMPTED to respond in a neutral mode....posting opposite sides to the story....YET
you guys just seem to talk over each other and ignore REAL conversation….go for it guys!
Rick wrote: Here's another one that I won't get a direct answer to.
Then you'll be 0 for 3 with your lame little gotcha attempts.
Rick wrote: If all women are to be believed when it comes to claims of sexual assault
Why is that true? Why don't you believe in due process?
First of all, these are not "gotcha attempts", just simple questions that you have failed to answer 3 times.
Secondly, I do believe in due process, which is why I thought what happened to Kavanaugh was horrible and unAmerican. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy you fail to see, which is obvious by your inability to answer a straight forward question.
Tell you what Brandon, ask me any question you want want that you think I would be unable to give you a DIRECT ANSWER to, I'll show you how answers are supposed to work and maybe it will help you in the future.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
Would THIS be what you are referencing ??? Authored by an award winning investigative reporter...…..seems to me that MANY errors were made on BOTH sides……..jmo
I have ATTEMPTED to respond in a neutral mode....posting opposite sides to the story....YET
you guys just seem to talk over each other and ignore REAL conversation….go for it guys!
I'll give you my full attention Home, please respond to any question I have posed and we can go from there.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy