- Posts: 10388
- Thank you received: 65
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Perfect analogy, Bob. It amazes me how people can think there was no bias in the Russia investigation from the start when every "mistake" was at the detriment of Trump. Every investigator and lawyer was either a Democrat donor or a Trump hater, including the lead investigators.Blazer Bob wrote: ""Imagine the Department of Justice inspector general (IG) conducting a review of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It might read something like this: 'While it is clear that Mr. Epstein abused minor girls, there is no documentary or testimonial evidence that he was motivated by a deviant sexual interest in those young girls.' "
-- Kevin Brock, former assistant director of intelligence for the FBI, FBI special agent for 24 years and principal deputy director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC).
www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsgs.aspx?su...ze=50&batchtype=Next
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Sadly you're probably right. McCabe, Clapper, and Brennan have been cashing in at CNN and MSNBC where only one view is permitted.Blazer Bob wrote: I think it more likely that they are negotiating contracts with CNN or maybe Netflix.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
If you're referring to FOX, yes they are more biased to the right but they also have a lot of leftist voices and actually have a couple pretty good anchors who actually don't spew bias like 100% of CNN and MSNBC anchors.There's also a whole lot of paid leftist contributors (flaming leftists not moderate pushovers). I can make you a list if you want. The reason FOX has these people and the other networks don't is because you can actually get both sides in debate form instead of having panels packed with only leftists stroking each other in agreement. This doesn't mean there are always both sides represented every minute of every program, but they do have the closet thing to balance you'll find in any form of news media. Can you think of another that has more balance? I can't.homeagain wrote: Could that also be true for the other side?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
That's one I've never watched but I'll take a look. I can't seem to find "On the Beat"... and what is the full name of ARI?homeagain wrote: think you need to check out ARI ON THE BEAT...msnbc..he is a lawyer and DOES include both
sides of stories, also plays devil's advocate when one side is being questioned.....relies on legal
pundits (past prosecutors who are legal eagles) AND attempts to do a balanced show.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The Nebraska Republican issued a statement Thursday indicating the investigation had concluded that then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta exercised “poor judgment” in regards to the plea agreement with Epstein.
“Letting a well-connected billionaire get away with child rape and international sex trafficking isn’t ‘poor judgment’ — it is a disgusting failure,” Sasse said. “Americans ought to be enraged. Jeffrey Epstein should be rotting behind bars today, but the Justice Department failed Epstein’s victims at every turn. The DOJ’s crooked deal with Epstein effectively shut down investigations into his child sex trafficking ring and protected his co-conspirators in other states. Justice has not been served.”
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.