- Posts: 15594
- Thank you received: 163
Well, thank you for at least addressing my prediction, but I wish you would have done that before it was proven to be correct. Unfortunately you've missed my point once again. You know how much I despise our biased and unfair media and this prediction was ONLY about that. The media you seem to trust has been telling us how much of a racist Trump is and how much he hates immigrants, especially those with darker skin. The Democrats and the media are the ones putting people in boxes, I'm just pointing out that those people can think for themselves.ScienceChic wrote:
That putting people in boxes based on their ethnicity, religion, gender, race, and sexual preferences are dumb assumptions to make about how they'll vote..Rick wrote: Do you agree with Pony and me that Trump will get more minority voters than any Republican in history? When that happens, how would you explain it?
The question is, do you bother asking people why they support whom they do, why they don't support the other candidates, and start talking about issues and solutions that you can find some common ground on and having fun, in-depth conversations, or do you just want to keep putting people in boxes, making assumptions about someone's beliefs based on how they vote or some other one-dimensional, superficial metric.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
[/b]Rick wrote:
Well, thank you for at least addressing my prediction, but I wish you would have done that before it was proven to be correct. Unfortunately you've missed my point once again. You know how much I despise our biased and unfair media and this prediction was ONLY about that. The media you seem to trust has been telling us how much of a racist Trump is and how much he hates immigrants, especially those with darker skin. The Democrats and the media are the ones putting people in boxes, I'm just pointing out that those people can think for themselves.ScienceChic wrote:
That putting people in boxes based on their ethnicity, religion, gender, race, and sexual preferences are dumb assumptions to make about how they'll vote..Rick wrote: Do you agree with Pony and me that Trump will get more minority voters than any Republican in history? When that happens, how would you explain it?
The question is, do you bother asking people why they support whom they do, why they don't support the other candidates, and start talking about issues and solutions that you can find some common ground on and having fun, in-depth conversations, or do you just want to keep putting people in boxes, making assumptions about someone's beliefs based on how they vote or some other one-dimensional, superficial metric.
My question is simple, if the media and Democrats are correct that Trump is a monster who hates minorities, then why would he get record numbers of minority votes? Who in the world would vote for someone they thought hated them because of their race or ethnicity?
The true credibility of your trusted media is at the bottom of the barrel and once again these idiots who come up with these polls need to find different lines of work.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
It's not intended as a non-answer, this is something I was pretty sure you agreed with me on. I have opposed identity politics for some time now, and that is what I said in my last reply. Identity politics is what Republicans slam Democrats for, and rightly so - I'm agreeing that it's counter-productive and dumb. So is populism, nationalism, and extremism, all three of which are directions both of our parties are headed in some fashion, and it's plainly evident in the results of yesterday's election. Sorry, I'm just not going to make any baseless statements as to why I think minorities supported Trump in this election because I don't have the data to draw any conclusions and I'm not a minority myself so I can't speak from a personal POV. Frankly, I think it's great that we are complex beings who hold diverse views, and if the Republican Party is figuring out how to reach voters they haven't typically served before, good for them. It shouldn't be that one party serves one type of voter, they should both be serving us all. Democrats sure haven't learned that lesson, as we've seen amply with the results of this election.Pony Soldier wrote: Wow... you should be running for office with that non-answer lol.
Rick wrote:
Why does it matter when I agree? Shouldn't it matter more that I did?ScienceChic wrote: Well, thank you for at least addressing my prediction, but I wish you would have done that before it was proven to be correct. Unfortunately you've missed my point once again. You know how much I despise our biased and unfair media and this prediction was ONLY about that. The media you seem to trust has been telling us how much of a racist Trump is and how much he hates immigrants, especially those with darker skin. The Democrats and the media are the ones putting people in boxes, I'm just pointing out that those people can think for themselves.
My question is simple, if the media and Democrats are correct that Trump is a monster who hates minorities, then why would he get record numbers of minority votes? Who in the world would vote for someone they thought hated them because of their race or ethnicity?
The true credibility of your trusted media is at the bottom of the barrel and once again these idiots who come up with these polls need to find different lines of work.
You know what though, you're totally right. It's "my trusted media" and I should forevermore only cite articles from CNN and MSNBC, or better yet, Occupy Democrats, Media Matters and Michael Moore, since that's "the media I seem to trust." No more court documents, no more press releases straight from the DOJ or White House, no more scientific journal articles just pure biased bullshit rammed down everyone's throat all the time. Apparently, nothing I've done and said these past 10 years means sh*t.
You can't just want an echo chamber here, right? Do you want to try to understand other voters' perspectives without making the same stereotypical assumptions that you excoriate them for now? Despite all the evidence right here on this site of the sources I've posted, I am accused of "trusting the media" and it makes me never want to bother posting again. I grow weary of being lumped into a box, as you claim only Democrats and the media do. How about sharing an article in which some minority voters have been interviewed and discussing their answers as to why they voted the way they did? Isn't that a much more interesting and productive conversation than beating the media dead horse again?
Trump is a malignant narcissist who cares only for himself. Everyone is beneath him, even some of his own children and his wives, their ethnicity matters not. All that matters to him is loyalty. He can't even be bothered with a dog or a cat. There's no joy in any stories that come from the WH, no games played on the lawn, no silly photos, no words of encouragement or displays of sincere empathy to those who've lost so much this year, just angry Tweeting and insults. He rules by fear-mongering and bullying, and people sometimes vote against what they fear (real or imagined) rather than for what they favor/support, even to their own detriment. There's more to it than that, but that requires letting go of assumptions about your own party just as I've had to let go of some of mine about Democrats (who are not even my party). It's unnerving, uncomfortable, at times aggravating, and requires a change in modus operandii. Are you up for the challenge?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
ScienceChic wrote:
It's not intended as a non-answer, this is something I was pretty sure you agreed with me on. I have opposed identity politics for some time now, and that is what I said in my last reply. Identity politics is what Republicans slam Democrats for, and rightly so - I'm agreeing that it's counter-productive and dumb. So is populism, nationalism, and extremism, all three of which are directions both of our parties are headed in some fashion, and it's plainly evident in the results of yesterday's election. Sorry, I'm just not going to make any baseless statements as to why I think minorities supported Trump in this election because I don't have the data to draw any conclusions and I'm not a minority myself so I can't speak from a personal POV. Frankly, I think it's great that we are complex beings who hold diverse views, and if the Republican Party is figuring out how to reach voters they haven't typically served before, good for them. It shouldn't be that one party serves one type of voter, they should both be serving us all. Democrats sure haven't learned that lesson, as we've seen amply with the results of this election.Pony Soldier wrote: Wow... you should be running for office with that non-answer lol.
Biden is winning but not by a landslide, Democrats lost seats in the house and did not take the Senate, and Trump seems very likely on his way to losing. That tells me, big picture, that the American people are frantically trying to create checks and balances on two parties that they find huge faults with because they are both going the wrong damn direction - away from the needs of The People. The pendulum keeps swinging out farther and farther, extremism begets extremism, and we lose in the process. Trump is the head of that problem for Republicans (any leader who simultaneously claims he won the election before the ballots are all counted and complains that Democrats are stealing the election, again before the results are known, is an unhinged moron who shouldn't be leading this country), and the Squad is the head of the Democrats problem. As I've said before, we both need to boot the extremists from our parties, resoundingly denounce law-breaking, uphold the rule of law especially when it's someone we support who did wrong, and figure out a way to work together.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
You're never going to get it SC and at this point I doubt you ever will. We all have to rely on the media to tell us what the truth is and we all pick different sources to get that truth. The last four years of Trump coverage has been disgraceful and dishonest at best and un-American at worst. There are so many facts out there that counter the majority of media narratives that were created to take out a duly elected president, yet that seems to be ok with you because orange man is a bad guy in your eyes. I believe you're the only scientist here yet you never seem to want to talk about facts and indisputable evidence. Why don't we start with that, like real journalists and scientists are supposed to do?ScienceChic wrote:
You can't just want an echo chamber here, right? Do you want to try to understand other voters' perspectives without making the same stereotypical assumptions that you excoriate them for now? Despite all the evidence right here on this site of the sources I've posted, I am accused of "trusting the media" and it makes me never want to bother posting again. I grow weary of being lumped into a box, as you claim only Democrats and the media do. How about sharing an article in which some minority voters have been interviewed and discussing their answers as to why they voted the way they did? Isn't that a much more interesting and productive conversation than beating the media dead horse again?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Pony Soldier wrote: Oh HA, sometimes you are just too much. Now it’s Trump’s fault that Hunter Biden’s criminality wasn’t reported or even pursued? Please just stop. You’re rid of Trump, your side has stolen an election on a massive scale. Give it a rest.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.