The point is that we are all individuals who make individual decisions and when you try to paint others with the actions of one, you instantly lose the argument.
I'M SO SORRY.... THAT does not square UP....EPSTEIN AND ASSOCIATES /guests is a prime
example of"running with the wrong crowd''....I do not accept your premise.
homeagain wrote: The point is that we are all individuals who make individual decisions and when you try to paint others with the actions of one, you instantly lose the argument.
I'M SO SORRY.... THAT does not square UP....EPSTEIN AND ASSOCIATES /guests is a prime
example of"running with the wrong crowd''....I do not accept your premise.
SIMILARITIES......BOTH are/were unscrupulous,BOTH have an agenda of abuse,illegal activity, BOTH
are/were abhorrent in their beliefs/practices...."when they FIRST show U who they R.,BELIEVE THEM
homeagain wrote: SIMILARITIES......BOTH are/were unscrupulous,BOTH have an agenda of abuse,illegal activity, BOTH
are/were abhorrent in their beliefs/practices...."when they FIRST show U who they R.,BELIEVE THEM
Can you show me any data that supports your premise other than what your gut tells you?
1. How many people are in Qanon?
2. Of those people, how many have criminal backgrounds or have been proven to be threats to society?
I look forward to reading your sources that could answer those two questions.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
LISTEN AT ABOUT 24 TIMEFRAME....I have to run,FURTHER discussion is required. ABOUT 20percentage,
see some validity or BELIEVE...it is broken down between D'S INDIES AND R'S.
That’s what I thought, no proof, just guesses. Also, does believing in any conspiracy mean that you are a danger to society? If so, 95% of Democrats could be seen as threats since I’m guessing that many of them believed Trump was guilty of colluding with Russia.
Let me know when you find actual evidence.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
LISTEN AT ABOUT 24 TIMEFRAME....I have to run,FURTHER discussion is required. ABOUT 20percentage,
see some validity or BELIEVE...it is broken down between D'S INDIES AND R'S.
Could the translator for HA, please tell me what this means.
Homeagain linked to a video. The 24 timeframe obviously means to listen at about the 24 minute mark, and she's describing the breakdown in percent between Republicans and Independents who "see some validity or believe."
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
Carrie wrote: And 99.9% of Republicans, <5% Independents...
Huh? 99.9% of Republicans believed Trump collided with Russia? Unsure what you’re truly my to say because that makes no sense.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
THAT does not square UP....EPSTEIN AND ASSOCIATES /guests is a prime
