TEXAS should succede ....don't come knocking on our door.

06 Sep 2021 12:59 #11 by FredHayek

hillfarmer wrote: "Salon has a piece where Satanists are joining against the abortion restrictions in Texas. If Satanists are on your side in a political dispute, you may want to reexamine your position. Satanists also like sacrificing newborns, and human sacrifice in general."

I call bullshit.

Google "Salon Satanists" and it shows the article in first place.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Sep 2021 13:01 #12 by FredHayek

homeagain wrote: WHY thank U for that enlighten editorial....NOW, let me comment as a WOMAN. BC pills fail...so do condoms AND so do plan B pills....my chirop. was on BC pills for 2 yrs after her divorce,in July she
thought she MIGHT be pregnant, took the Plan B pill 10 hours in....both times it came back NOT preggos
,then she took the OTC preg. test (twice)...it came back positive...she WAS pregnant....she miscarried.

THIS asisine state is attempting to take away the "at home" termination pill....OVER MY FRIGGIN DEAD BODY. (I am so elated I am beyond child bearing years ) BUT, GUNS.....now there is a sacred idol,they
have the intelligence to NOT REQUIRE TRAINING...in what world does this make sense....TEXANS R
LACKING in forward thinking....because they have a big pair...:angry: :angry: :angry:

If all your birth control fails, maybe you need to take that as a sign from God?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

06 Sep 2021 17:01 #13 by homeagain
Miscarriages are not uncommon....if U want to get philosophical,perhaps it's nature way of preventing a
non viable entity.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Sep 2021 11:40 #14 by Rick
This argument by the left always omits the obvious and important factor that should always be included, the right of the living human being. Pelosi is all in on allowing abortion all the way up to nine moths and never mentions the actual scientific fact that a human life is being taken. They have used their regular tactic of changing words to soften the reality of what an abortion, or the killing of a young human, is just "women's reproductive health". That sounds so much better and is much easier to digest, especially if the actual images of the process are not widely viewed, especially by the women who are making the decision to terminate that life.

I always image what a more advanced alien life would think if they landed on this planet and learned what we were doing to the unborn. Would they think that was more or less civilized when there are other alternatives to ripping the small living body into pieces and throwing them into the trash. Does that really make us a more advanced life form or just the opposite?

It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy

George Orwell

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Sep 2021 13:23 #15 by homeagain
LINK PLEASE for the Pelosi statement....(9months). NEXT question, so when R men going to bring the BC PILL TO MARKET FOR THE MALE.....Viagra is very available,WTF. This "problem" will cease being a problem,when MEN accept that their responsibility is EQUAL (don't want the problem,then U GET STERILIZED OR PUSH PHARMCO FOR THE MALE VERSION OF BC PILL...u take the "load off the female"
(condoms are NOT the answer.) I am NOT Relinquishing the rights to my body, just as males will NOT
relinquish the great gun,make me a man tool.

The REAL question ,of course, is...WHO will feed,clothed,nurture,take time off from work if thebaby/child
is sick? WHO will take the financial hardship to raise the child for 18 years and assure the child will be loved
protected and shown the way to a healthy adulthood? WHO??? CHILD NEGLECT IS AT AN ALL TIME HIGH.
because the woman can not do it all...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

07 Sep 2021 19:39 - 08 Sep 2021 14:36 #16 by FredHayek
please provide the source that child neglect is at an all time high. The birthrate in America is at an all time low. Families are the smallest they have ever been. More Americans are dying than being born. Population would be falling without legal and illegal immigration.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Sep 2021 07:27 #17 by homeagain
these stats r NOT recent,this is 2021,the article sites 2015...and U THINK IT HAS GOTTEN BETTER???

www.invisiblechildren.org/2017/12/29/chi...5EAAYASAAEgJENfD_BwE

THE MOST AT RISK ARE THE YOUNGEST (babies) It is very telling that what was keyed on was wanting
a link,WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER PARTS OF THE POST?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Sep 2021 11:14 #18 by FredHayek
Your article had no comparisons to other decades so it was useless and even if you agree with it, carry it to the next level. To save the child from possible abuse and neglect, we killed the child in the 9th month instead. I wonder if they have done studies on the parents who couldn't be bothered to use birth control, or get abortions in a timely manner wind up being horrible parents. I think there is probably a pretty good correlation there.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Sep 2021 07:21 #19 by homeagain

homeagain wrote: LINK PLEASE for the Pelosi statement....(9months). NEXT question, so when R men going to bring the BC PILL TO MARKET FOR THE MALE.....Viagra is very available,WTF. This "problem" will cease being a problem,when MEN accept that their responsibility is EQUAL (don't want the problem,then U GET STERILIZED OR PUSH PHARMCO FOR THE MALE VERSION OF BC PILL...u take the "load off the female"
(condoms are NOT the answer.) I am NOT Relinquishing the rights to my body, just as males will NOT
relinquish the great gun,make me a man tool.

The REAL question ,of course, is...WHO will feed,clothed,nurture,take time off from work if thebaby/child
is sick? WHO will take the financial hardship to raise the child for 18 years and assure the child will be loved
protected and shown the way to a healthy adulthood? WHO???
CHILD NEGLECT IS AT AN ALL TIME HIGH.

ANSWER THE QUESTION....because IT is the bases for basic women's rights....I have a personal
scenario for U to consider, the foster care/adoption paradigm is woefully underfunded/understaffed and
is inadequate.

My "fitness trainer" is fostering a baby,the baby was 2mo old and underdeveloped,languishing in health
and was under the care of a mentally handicapped young mother. The child protection agency stepped
in to rescue the baby. It took 2 0r3 months to finally place the child in a "good" home...the baby is almost 1 yr.next month and is doing extremely well. It took months to bring the child back from the brink of neglect.

THIS child was lucky,many others still wait for a mother and dad, instead they grow up in the "system"....go talk to ANY social worker in the field, it is a tragedy and u will come back with a far different view.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Sep 2021 09:08 #20 by FredHayek
Child neglect is not at an all time high! Stop spouting untruths. Under President Biden, the social safety net is at the highest it has ever been. The school lunch program has expanded to breakfast and even giving meals to children during Summer vacation. In Colorado, preschool is now free. Go back to the 1930's and 40's if you want to see child neglect, the Great Depression, orphanages. Real poverty.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.169 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+