Scientists Leaving Us in the Dark

15 Nov 2021 07:54 #1 by Rick
140 million people in the US have had COVID, yet the CDC has no data on how many of those people have been re-infected or have spread COVID once they had natural immunity. Wouldn't it be scientifically useful to compare and contrast natural immunity to the "vaccines", or would that information cause Americans to question whether or not we've been kept in the dark on purpose?

Show us the damn data if you're going to force us to take the jab!

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2021 08:12 #2 by homeagain
WELL NOW,WE AGREE......the problem is the data is a moving target, can not pin it down BECAUSE it
is no longer a pandemic,but has become endemic. It has morphed too many times, and impossible to calculate numbers.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2021 09:02 #3 by ScienceChic
No data on how many of those people have been re-infected or have spread COVID once they had natural immunity? You're right, the weekly CDC Morbidity and Mortality Report has never been shared here before as a resource.

Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 Among Adults Hospitalized with COVID-19–Like Illness with Infection-Induced or mRNA Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Immunity — Nine States, January–September 2021
Weekly / November 5, 2021 / 70(44);1539–1544

On October 29, 2021, this report was posted online as an MMWR Early Release.

Catherine H. Bozio, PhD1; Shaun J. Grannis, MD2,3; Allison L. Naleway, PhD4; Toan C. Ong, PhD5; Kristen A. Butterfield, MPH6; Malini B. DeSilva, MD7; Karthik Natarajan, PhD8,9; Duck-Hye Yang, PhD6; Suchitra Rao, MBBS5; Nicola P. Klein, MD, PhD10; Stephanie A. Irving, MHS4; Brian E. Dixon, PhD2,11; Kristin Dascomb, MD, PhD12; I-Chia Liao, MPH13; Sue Reynolds, PhD1; Charlene McEvoy, MD7; Jungmi Han8; Sarah E. Reese, PhD6; Ned Lewis, MPH10; William F. Fadel, PhD2,11; Nancy Grisel, MPP12; Kempapura Murthy, MBBS13; Jill Ferdinands, PhD1; Anupam B. Kharbanda, MD14; Patrick K. Mitchell, ScD6; Kristin Goddard, MPH10; Peter J. Embi, MD3,15; Julie Arndorfer, MPH12; Chandni Raiyani, MPH13; Palak Patel, MBBS1; Elizabeth A. Rowley, DrPH6; Bruce Fireman, MA10; Nimish R. Valvi, DrPH, MBBS2; Eric P. Griggs, MPH1; Matthew E. Levy, PhD6; Ousseny Zerbo, PhD10; Rachael M. Porter, MPH1; Rebecca J. Birch, MPH6; Lenee Blanton, MPH1; Sarah W. Ball, ScD6; Andrea Steffens, MPH1; Natalie Olson, MPH1; Jeremiah Williams, MPH1; Monica Dickerson, MPH1; Meredith McMorrow, MD1; Stephanie J. Schrag, DPhil1; Jennifer R. Verani, MD1; Alicia M. Fry, MD1; Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner, MD1; Michelle Barron, MD5; Manjusha Gaglani, MBBS13; Mark G. Thompson, PhD1; Edward Stenehjem, MD12 (View author affiliations)

Summary

What is already known about this topic?

Previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 vaccination can provide immunity and protection against subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection and illness.

What is added by this report?

Among COVID-19–like illness hospitalizations among adults aged ≥18 years whose previous infection or vaccination occurred 90–179 days earlier, the adjusted odds of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 among unvaccinated adults with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were 5.49-fold higher than the odds among fully vaccinated recipients of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine who had no previous documented infection (95% confidence interval = 2.75–10.99).

What are the implications for public health practice?

All eligible persons should be vaccinated against COVID-19 as soon as possible, including unvaccinated persons previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) or COVID-19 vaccination can provide immunity and protection from subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection and illness. CDC used data from the VISION Network* to examine hospitalizations in adults with COVID-19–like illness and compared the odds of receiving a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, and thus having laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, between unvaccinated patients with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection occurring 90–179 days before COVID-19–like illness hospitalization, and patients who were fully vaccinated with an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine 90–179 days before hospitalization with no previous documented SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hospitalized adults aged ≥18 years with COVID-19–like illness were included if they had received testing at least twice: once associated with a COVID-19–like illness hospitalization during January–September 2021 and at least once earlier (since February 1, 2020, and ≥14 days before that hospitalization). Among COVID-19–like illness hospitalizations in persons whose previous infection or vaccination occurred 90–179 days earlier, the odds of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 (adjusted for sociodemographic and health characteristics) among unvaccinated, previously infected adults were higher than the odds among fully vaccinated recipients of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine with no previous documented infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 5.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.75–10.99). These findings suggest that among hospitalized adults with COVID-19–like illness whose previous infection or vaccination occurred 90–179 days earlier, vaccine-induced immunity was more protective than infection-induced immunity against laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. All eligible persons should be vaccinated against COVID-19 as soon as possible, including unvaccinated persons previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.


"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2021 13:42 #4 by homeagain
TOTALLY confused......ONE J&J shot is adequate, when given early in this calendar year (Q1 timeframe)?
As I read the info, my vaccine (one) will protect/lessen the effects of the virus? It is nowQ4 and although I take adequate precautions, mask wearing when REQUIRED, no mask otherwise...I attempt to stay away from indoors/crowded conditions,, sanitize carts when in grocery stores (no mask) and generally just live my life.....I AM NOT FEARFUL, AND SEEM TO BE OK. i QUESTION THE NEED FOR SEVERAL VACS,
SPECIFICALLY IF U R NOT IN THE AUTOIMMUNE COMPROMISED COLUMN.....so much chaos and confusion just compounds the issue.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2021 18:26 #5 by Rick
1. How many people with natural immunity are spreading the virus vs people who have only gotten the vaccine?

2. How many of the 140 million people who have natural immunity have gotten a re-infection compared to people who have gotten the shot and do not have natural immunity?

Those are the numbers I'm looking for if you can find them.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2021 19:10 #6 by Rick
Why did the CDC stop tracking breakthrough cases in May? Why do we rarely hear Fauci talking about natural immunity?

So many things we've been told over the last 18 months have been wrong, yet our government keeps forcing us to take a shot, including our kids who are at no greater risk than if they got the flu. We've never seen the FDA green light anything this fast, yet we are to believe that these vaccines are 100% safe long term. We also can't sue if it turns out some people suffer deadly consequences.

More transparency will ALWAYS result in more trust and therefore more compliance.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Nov 2021 10:36 #7 by ScienceChic
Why do you think they stopped tracking any cases, breakthrough or otherwise? That link I shared proves they didn't - it's data from JANUARY-SEPTEMBER 2021. Earlier MMWRs will show you 2020 if you want to go back that far.

What have you been told that's wrong? Is it that scientists and doctors were still trying to figure out how the virus infected people and wreaked the havoc it did, or are you listening to stupid media sources simply saying that?

The FDA went through the vaccine testing and approval process at the same speed as they do with all other vaccines. The time saved in creating the COVID vaccines was in the beginning steps, building the mRNA-based vaccines, not the FDA testing and approval stage, which was due to pharmaceutical companies having been testing mRNA therapies for years now and the Trump administration rightfully throwing money and support behind the rapid scale up of vaccine production prior to approval on the hopes that the results would be favorable so they could be ready to ship millions of doses for administering as soon as approval was made. Most of the time, mass production doesn't happen until after approval because it's an expensive gamble, and there isn't such an urgent need for millions of doses immediately.

5 million people have died of COVID so far since it began. The vaccines are just as safe as the flu vaccines, and if your family isn't contra-indicated to receive it, why wouldn't you protect yourself and them? Do you like being sick? Do you invite the risk of being hospitalized when healthcare workers are burnt out, over-worked, and our hospitals are at limited capacity to treat new cases?

Not a single doctor or scientist has claimed that any vaccine is 100% safe, or 100% effective. I agree that pharmaceutical companies need to be held accountable if they knowingly supply dangerous products, but that's a different topic for discussion on policy.

The transparency is there, the data is all there. Stop listening to the media, and Fauci, and go LOOK at the data that's been published on the CDC's website since the very beginning.

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Nov 2021 11:02 #8 by ScienceChic

1. How many people with natural immunity are spreading the virus vs people who have only gotten the vaccine?

Answer: Every one of them. Regardless of whether you've gotten the virus, recovered and been re-infected, or been vaccinated and get the virus, you are infectious. The difference is that you are far less likely to get the virus if you've been vaccinated, and thus less likely to spread it to others, and far less likely to suffer severe symptoms requiring hospitalization if you've been vaccinated.

2. How many of the 140 million people who have natural immunity have gotten a re-infection compared to people who have gotten the shot and do not have natural immunity?

Impossible to know because most people who get re-infected don't go to the hospital (so their case is documented) and some of those are likely asymptomatic so unless they do weekly tests on themselves, they wouldn't even know they are re-infected.

Also, it's not technically correct when saying that those who are vaccinated do not have "natural immunity." The vaccination gives your body natural immunity by priming your immune system to recognize and attack the same virus should your body encounter it, without the danger of the whole native virus infecting you.

It's an old terminology saying "natural" virus (especially in this case as we have no idea yet how this virus originated and it's unlikely we'll ever get answers from CCP, for which they need to be held account). That used to denote the original strain that came out, with mutant versions arising from that. Now that we genetically sequence viruses, it's simply the original, or native, strain, and any variants are denoted by the base pair mutation # and subsequent amino acid change. If you'd like to follow more about the evolution of SARS-CoV-2, I highly recommend Dr. Trevor Bedford.

Nice overview:
What are the Delta, Gamma, Beta and Alpha Covid variants?
By Michelle Roberts, BBC | October 19, 2021

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Nov 2021 17:37 #9 by Rick
SC, it's pretty simple... if the CDC isn't interested in tracking re-infections that end up in the hospital, then everything you posted really doesn't answer any of my questions.

Why would it not be a good idea to track all the data? My daughter works at Lutheran Hospital and the majority of the covid patients have been vaccinated and she hasn't seen one yet that had contracted covid a second time. Yes, it's just one hospital, but every one of those patients is another number that should be counted in a separate category.

Do you really feel like we are getting all the information, even if that information may deter some people from getting the shot and forever boosters?

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

17 Nov 2021 14:11 #10 by ScienceChic
They ARE tracking re-infections that end up in the hospital, and the CDC data I posted shows that. I'm not sure how I could state this any differently to improve understanding that point.

I don't know if your daughter is collecting data comprehensively or not, but it completely differs from what UC Health is seeing, and as you say, it's only one hospital. The CDC collects data from hospitals across the country so their data is more comprehensive.

Why are Colorado COVID-19 cases spiking?
By: Todd Neff, for UCHealth | Nov. 5, 2021

Those who are unvaccinated comprise about 80% of infections. At UCHealth hospitals, that ratio holds: 78% of those hospitalized and 91% of those in ICUs are unvaccinated. The ones hospitalized despite being vaccinated are often immunocompromised or significantly older.


"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.147 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+