- Posts: 27924
- Thank you received: 158
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Her vote is now one of the most powerful in the Senate.Rick wrote: Did Sinema say she wouldn't caucus with Dems or is that an assumption? It doesn't matter anyway since there's too many weak Republicans like McConnell who don't fight for conservatives and end up bending over for the communists, AKA Democrats. She's now worthless to both parties, just like Manchin and should start looking for a real job where she can be a productive member of society. She really pissed off the hags at The View, so she does get points for that.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
[/b]FredHayek wrote: She says she won't caucus with the Democrats, but Chuck Schumer is letting her keep her committee assignments. Maybe he knows a senator who votes Democrat 90% of the time is better than having her join the Republican Party. This will be the 3rd independent senator. Could this be the start of a trend?
Less Americans are Party members.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Mary Scott wrote:
Her vote is now one of the most powerful in the Senate.Rick wrote: Did Sinema say she wouldn't caucus with Dems or is that an assumption? It doesn't matter anyway since there's too many weak Republicans like McConnell who don't fight for conservatives and end up bending over for the communists, AKA Democrats. She's now worthless to both parties, just like Manchin and should start looking for a real job where she can be a productive member of society. She really pissed off the hags at The View, so she does get points for that.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Not really if you consider how different the sides are. You say you're an "Indy" but I cant imagine you would vote for a Republican. There is no middle if you look at the issues and the party platforms. When one side what's to kneecap the economy by destroying our affordable energy and the other side wants to open up our energy sector and become independent AGAIN, where would the middle be... partial destruction?homeagain wrote:
[/b]FredHayek wrote: She says she won't caucus with the Democrats, but Chuck Schumer is letting her keep her committee assignments. Maybe he knows a senator who votes Democrat 90% of the time is better than having her join the Republican Party. This will be the 3rd independent senator. Could this be the start of a trend?
Less Americans are Party members.
HOW refreshing that would be.....NO "sheep",just serious considerations of issues.UNAffiliates unite
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Everyday Americans are increasingly left behind by national parties’ rigid partisanship, which has hardened in recent years. Pressures in both parties pull leaders to the edges, allowing the loudest, most extreme voices to determine their respective parties’ priorities and expecting the rest of us to fall in line.
In catering to the fringes, neither party has demonstrated much tolerance for diversity of thought. Bipartisan compromise is seen as a rarely acceptable last resort, rather than the best way to achieve lasting progress. Payback against the opposition party has replaced thoughtful legislating.
I work proudly with senators in both parties who have similarly rejected political extremes and forged consensus, helping drain some of the poison from today’s politics.
Americans are more united than the national parties would have us believe. We’ve shown that a diverse democracy can still function effectively.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Rick wrote:
Not really if you consider how different the sides are. You say you're an "Indy" but I cant imagine you would vote for a Republican. There is no middle if you look at the issues and the party platforms. When one side what's to kneecap the economy by destroying our affordable energy and the other side wants to open up our energy sector and become independent AGAIN, where would the middle be... partial destruction?homeagain wrote:
[/b]FredHayek wrote: She says she won't caucus with the Democrats, but Chuck Schumer is letting her keep her committee assignments. Maybe he knows a senator who votes Democrat 90% of the time is better than having her join the Republican Party. This will be the 3rd independent senator. Could this be the start of a trend?
Less Americans are Party members.
HOW refreshing that would be.....NO "sheep",just serious considerations of issues.UNAffiliates unite
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.