the king AND HIS kingdom

Rick wrote: Your long post from a TDS 'journalist' doesn't interest me at all, so it was a very fast scroll. If you're not even going to summarize it with your opinion, it's just more hot garbage for me to ignore.

OH MY,u must have missed the last 4 or 5 words of my LAST paragraph......SUMS UP THE FOURTH TURNING...that is my opinion and I DID post a summary.

Rick wrote: Bottom line... did this bogus conviction that will be overturned hurt ...

Why do you say it is bogus? Do you know something about the trial that we, and the jurors, do not know? Please tell us about these facts and your reasoning. Be specific.

EVERYONE already knows. That includes the left.

CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig skewered Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg in a new column reacting to Donald Trump’s conviction on Thursday, calling the case that led to it an “ill-conceived, unjustified mess.”

Under the headline “Prosecutors Got Trump — But They Contorted the Law,” Honig systematically took apart Bragg’s case.

“Reasonable minds could have come out either way, and this jury found that the prosecution carried its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury’s work, and their verdict, deserve respect,” he began. “But that doesn’t mean that every structural infirmity around the Manhattan district attorney’s case has evaporated. Both of these things can be true at once: The jury did its job, and this case was an ill-conceived, unjustified mess.”

I'm glad that you and I, and CNN, agree that the case was tried correctly and the jury unanimously came to a verdict of guilty. Therefore, it is not BOGUS. Good to know.

koobookie wrote: I'm glad that you and I, and CNN, agree that the case was tried correctly and the jury unanimously came to a verdict of guilty. Therefore, it is not BOGUS. Good to know.

The case will be overturned on appeal... what will you say then?

Rick wrote:

koobookie wrote: I'm glad that you and I, and CNN, agree that the case was tried correctly and the jury unanimously came to a verdict of guilty. Therefore, it is not BOGUS. Good to know.

The case will be overturned on appeal... what will you say then?

When the case is not overturned on appeal, you will still claim it's bogus.

No, because it won't matter either way. Trump can still be president, regardless.

Rick wrote: No, because it won't matter either way. Trump can still be president, regardless.

OH BUT HE MAY BE BUSTED, in another way....NO LIQUOR LICENSES for his beautiful bars.


abcnews.go.com/US/new-jerseys-division-a...r/story?id=110998808


New Jersey's Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control reviewing liquor licenses held by Trump's golf courses

"ABC is reviewing the impact of President Trump's conviction," the agency said.
ByAaron Katersky
June 10, 2024, 3:24 PM

0:26

New Jersey Alcoholic Beverage Control reviewing liquor licenses held by Trump

New Jersey Alcoholic Beverage Control reviewing liquor licenses held by Trump
Donald Trump holds three active licenses for Trump National Golf Club Colts Neck, Lamington Farm Clu...

The New Jersey Attorney General's Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) is reviewing the liquor licenses held by former President Donald Trump's golf courses in the state following his criminal conviction in New York, the agency confirmed.

Trump holds three active licenses for Trump National Golf Club Colts Neck, Lamington Farm Club and Trump National Golf Club Pine Hill.

"ABC is reviewing the impact of President Trump's conviction on the above referenced licenses, and declines further comment at this time," a spokesperson for the agency said in an email.

Sell the properties to his children?

homeagain wrote:

Rick wrote: No, because it won't matter either way. Trump can still be president, regardless.

OH BUT HE MAY BE BUSTED, in another way....NO LIQUOR LICENSES for his beautiful bars.

OMGeeee, serously?!!??!?!!!?? That is high-larious!