So . . . in all 7 battleground States female voter turnout is down noticeably compared to 4 years ago and yet there are individuals here who believe that the female vote is going to be the deciding factor in a Harris victory. It won't matter how many CA or NY women vote for Harris because they hate Trump . . . those are only 2 of the 51 elections being held in the presidential contest.
Sure, it helps the stats for those interested in trying to give life to the politics of division who are hoping to capitalize on the misogynist/racist/(add your favorite -ist to the list) angle in the event(uality?) of a Harris defeat, but we're looking at amazing similarities to 2016 here, which is the last time the Democrats offered up an unlikable woman to head their ticket and came up short on election day.
Perhaps, but whoever it ends up being is going to be a more moderate choice than the last 2 offerings from the Democrats who want voters to be more concerned with the sex of the candidate than with their policies. Vote for me because I'm a woman and its time for a woman president doesn't appear to be a winning campaign strategy for them, and it won't be a winning strategy for Republican's either.
They insist President Trump is a fascist but they have no evidence. Which party went into a private home and both kidnapped and then destroyed family pets? The Democrats of New York State.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.