FredHayek wrote: Anyone else have an issue with voting for someone who won't actually be in charge?
President Trump does tend to delegate much of his office. Much of being President he doesn't care for, but you know he is in control and does write his own tweets.
Kamala? You trust the DNC to build a top team to do most of the heavy lifting while she plays "Madame President"?
Are you speaking of Harris? If elected, you don't think she will be in charge? What's your basis for this allegation?
She doesn't take charge. She had numerous opportunities to take on increased responsibilities in the wake of Joe Biden's senility but she didn't.
What makes you think that Kamala Harris will be a strong leader? Her refusal to do press conferences? Her refusal to be interviewed by Elon Musk or Fox?
In 2016, candidate Trump was consistently appearing on MSNBC, and other liberal shows. In fact Scarborough regrets letting the Donald get so much free air time. He thinks it might have made the difference against Hillary Clinton.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote: She doesn't write her own tweets.
Many candidates and politicians do not write their own tweets.
FredHayek wrote: She doesn't take charge. She had numerous opportunities to take on increased responsibilities in the wake of Joe Biden's senility but she didn't.
You know this how? You have been in on all the meetings in the White House to see? What is your basis for this allegation?
FredHayek wrote: What makes you think that Kamala Harris will be a strong leader? Her refusal to do press conferences? Her refusal to be interviewed by Elon Musk or Fox?
Her years as a prosecutor, as the California Attorney General, as a California Senator, and her experience as the Vice President.
If Kamala’s experience was such a big plus, why was she one of the first to be booted from the primary? She was completely unlikable right up until the Democrats had to admit that Joe was losing his mind. Funny how that works.
Rick wrote: If Kamala’s experience was such a big plus, why was she one of the first to be booted from the primary? She was completely unlikable right up until the Democrats had to admit that Joe was losing his mind. Funny how that works.
You mean the primary that was about 5 years ago? Seriously? Come on, Rick, she has had 5 years to gain experience and let people see who she has become. Look at the polls - you can see the momentum. I know that scares you, but people are going to vote for the former prosecutor and not the convicted felon.
You boys are scraping the bottom of the barrel in your efforts to combat Harris & Walz.
Rick wrote: If Kamala’s experience was such a big plus, why was she one of the first to be booted from the primary? She was completely unlikable right up until the Democrats had to admit that Joe was losing his mind. Funny how that works.
You mean the primary that was about 5 years ago? Seriously? Come on, Rick, she has had 5 years to gain experience and let people see who she has become. Look at the polls - you can see the momentum. I know that scares you, but people are going to vote for the former prosecutor and not the convicted felon.
You boys are scraping the bottom of the barrel in your efforts to combat Harris & Walz.
OK, instead of focusing on me, again, why not list the accomplishments she has had over the last 3.5 years as VP? She's tied to everything from the Afghanistan withdrawal, to the border, to the economy, and everything else this administration has done.
Just show me how she earned her new popularity other than just being Biden's diversity hire.
“In the presidential election of 2024 there is only one political party and one candidate for the presidency that can claim the mantle of defender and protector of America’s Democracy, the Constitution, and the Rule of Law,” Luttig wrote in a statement obtained exclusively by CNN. “As a result, I will unhesitatingly vote for the Democratic Party’s candidate for the Presidency of the United States, Vice President of the United States, Kamala Harris.”
