Two of the most popular liberal news sites are calling for violence against Republicans for obstructing the radical agenda of President Barack Obama.
CNN and Huffington Post have each published op-eds this past week by regular contributors with headlines that explicitly call for Obama to use violent gangland tactics against his political opponents.
CNN published a column by Roland Martin on February 11 with the headline, Time for Obama to go ‘gangsta’ on GOP.
Martin concluded the article with a plea for Obama to emulate the violent tactics of the Prohibition-era Chicago mob boss Al Capone.
Obama’s critics keep blasting him for Chicago-style politics. So, fine. Channel your inner Al Capone and go gangsta against your foes. Let ‘em know that if they aren’t with you, they are against you, and will pay the price.
The Huffington Post followed-up with their own call for gangland violence against Republicans with the publication on February 14 of a column by David Bourgeois with the title, Obama Better Start Breaking Kneecaps.
Is John Mayer Correct About the Huffington Post?:
Last week, The Huffington Post was one of numerous news sites that released a story about singer John Mayer being back together with Jennifer Aniston. The story, supposedly untrue, obviously made John Mayer angry and he was soon on Twitter slamming The Huffington Post for being the "Internet Death Star" and saying "HuffPo, go f..k yourself". As part of his diatribe Mayer also called HuffPo "dangerous". Is he correct? Has The Huffington Post really disintegrated into a news blog filled with lies and celebrity gossip. Yep. Pretty much. Is it dangerous? No, not at all. Confused? Read on.
outdoor338 wrote: CNN published a column by Roland Martin on February 11 with the headline, Time for Obama to go ‘gangsta’ on GOP.
The Huffington Post followed-up with their own call for gangland violence against Republicans with the publication on February 14 of a column by David Bourgeois with the title, Obama Better Start Breaking Kneecaps.
You do know it's almost November, don't you Outdoor? There's been plenty of time for this alleged violence to have happened. Seen any? (other than that guy stomping on some woman's head at the Rand Paul rally)
And the reporter that was handcuffed for asking questions by the unlicensed "private security firm" (which was actually active-duty military personnel).
Isn't it interesting that a day or two later, Miller was forced to admit that the scandal the reporter was asking about was TRUE. Hmmmm...The new Republican strategy--don't answer questions; lie about things; hide in the bunker until the election is over... (See: Angle, Miller, O'Donnell, et al...) It may work for a couple of them this time... I can guarantee you that next time it won't, and the news organizations will combat it in a way that will be very damaging to the candidates...(Except FauxNews, of course...They'll do whatever the RNC tells them to.)
LadyJazzer wrote: And the reporter that was handcuffed for asking questions by the unlicensed "private security firm" (which was actually active-duty military personnel).
Yeah, I forgot about all these instances, but they're not liberal toward conservatives... quite the opposite:
* Joe Miller gestapo handcuffs reporter
* Rand Paul supporters foot-stomp female gadfly
* Carl Paladino threatens to take-out reporter
* Christine O’Donnell campaign threatens to destroy local radio station
* Sharron Angle endorses “Second-Amendment Solution”
* Michelle Bachmann wants the citizens of Minnesota armed and dangerous
* Steve Brodden says violent overthrow of the government is on the table
* Tim Ravndal says “fruits” should be hung up where they can be seen