If the election were held today, who would you vote for?

08 Nov 2010 09:49 #1 by Wayne Harrison
If the election were held today, who would you vote for as President of the United States?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Nov 2010 10:06 #2 by Residenttroll returns

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Nov 2010 10:10 #3 by FredHayek
I like Romney. He served as governor in a blue state so he has executive experience, business experience, knows how to pass legislation with a Dem majority. But I think he will be considered too moderate for the GOP base, so they will choose someone who runs more to the right.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Nov 2010 10:45 #4 by CC
I chose Romney also.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Nov 2010 11:16 #5 by Wayne Harrison
Romney is actually the only governor in American history ever to impose an individual health insurance mandate on his citizens. And an individual mandate, of course, is at the heart of Obama's reform package.

Nor is the mandate the only common ground between RomneyCare and ObamaCare; the Massachusetts plan that Romney signed into law in 2006 is essentially the blueprint for Obama's plan. Both rely on the same basic formula: a requirement that everyone purchase insurance and government assistance for those who can't afford it.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/ ... _hypocrisy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Nov 2010 11:34 #6 by Something the Dog Said

Pineguy wrote: Romney is actually the only governor in American history ever to impose an individual health insurance mandate on his citizens. And an individual mandate, of course, is at the heart of Obama's reform package.

Nor is the mandate the only common ground between RomneyCare and ObamaCare; the Massachusetts plan that Romney signed into law in 2006 is essentially the blueprint for Obama's plan. Both rely on the same basic formula: a requirement that everyone purchase insurance and government assistance for those who can't afford it.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/ ... _hypocrisy


But it is ok since he has an R after his name.

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Nov 2010 11:43 #7 by Grady

Something the Dog Said wrote:

Pineguy wrote: Romney is actually the only governor in American history ever to impose an individual health insurance mandate on his citizens. And an individual mandate, of course, is at the heart of Obama's reform package.

Nor is the mandate the only common ground between RomneyCare and ObamaCare; the Massachusetts plan that Romney signed into law in 2006 is essentially the blueprint for Obama's plan. Both rely on the same basic formula: a requirement that everyone purchase insurance and government assistance for those who can't afford it.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/ ... _hypocrisy


But it is ok since he has an R after his name.

No because it's a state issue. Where in the constitution does it state that the Federal government can force me to buy anything.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Nov 2010 11:45 #8 by CC
So many assumptions.....so little time!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Nov 2010 12:04 #9 by Something the Dog Said

Grady wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote:

Pineguy wrote: Romney is actually the only governor in American history ever to impose an individual health insurance mandate on his citizens. And an individual mandate, of course, is at the heart of Obama's reform package.

Nor is the mandate the only common ground between RomneyCare and ObamaCare; the Massachusetts plan that Romney signed into law in 2006 is essentially the blueprint for Obama's plan. Both rely on the same basic formula: a requirement that everyone purchase insurance and government assistance for those who can't afford it.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/ ... _hypocrisy


But it is ok since he has an R after his name.

No because it's a state issue. Where in the constitution does it state that the Federal government can force me to buy anything.



Article 1, Section 8

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

08 Nov 2010 12:32 #10 by RenegadeCJ
I voted Rubio, although if he ran, I would prefer Chris Christie.

I have no issue with Romney's "individual mandate". It is a states rights issue. If a state chooses to do such a mandate, it is their own people asking for it.

Too bad future generations aren't here to see all the great things we are spending their $$ on!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.155 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+