Park County starving dogs case-enough jail time? (Poll)

10 Feb 2011 11:30 #11 by Local_Historian
I think there is a big difference between the humane putting down of a bunch of cats due to an illness, and leaving a bunch of animals - of any kind - caged, fenced or tied up and leaving them to starve to death, or barely feeding them enough to sustain a minimum of life in pain and suffering. That's just a cruel mind and cruel behavior. If he couldn't support those dogs anymore, he had many other avenues rather than just leaving them there tied up. Of course, only one is sanctioned -finding them new homes - but he could have released them, he could have even shot them. But he didn't - he chose to leave them to starve.

THAT level or cruelty deserves more jail time.

They're only dogs - they're only old people with dementia and senility. See how easy it is to make that cross over? And old folks are equally abused and starved.

ANY level of purposeful cruelty is fully unacceptable- to any one or any thing.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Feb 2011 12:34 #12 by Residenttroll returns

CinnamonGirl wrote:
Animals and Children depend on adults and we need to take that seriously. It is his fault for even taking on the responsibility if he could not do it.


Are you stupid? Animals don't need humans. Geez, are the liberals just getting more stupid by the day or am I just getting impatient with their non-sense.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Feb 2011 12:37 #13 by Residenttroll returns

Local_Historian wrote: leaving a bunch of animals - of any kind - caged, fenced or tied up and leaving them to starve to death, or barely feeding them enough to sustain a minimum of life in pain and suffering. That's just a cruel mind and cruel behavior.


Question: Do you go out and feed the bears when the forest experiences a drought and they can't find enough food? If not, you have a cruel mind and cruel behavior. By the way, I hear the bears are REALLY hungry.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Feb 2011 12:46 #14 by CinnamonGirl

residenttroll wrote:

CinnamonGirl wrote:
Animals and Children depend on adults and we need to take that seriously. It is his fault for even taking on the responsibility if he could not do it.


Are you stupid? Animals don't need humans. Geez, are the liberals just getting more stupid by the day or am I just getting impatient with their non-sense.


Dogs have been bred to stay almost as puppies so we can train them and use them for certain jobs. They are not wild anymore. We have a responsibility for pets. Animals in the wild are a different story unless we take them out of it. If we make it to where they do not have the resources for themselves then it is up to us. RT are you sick or something?

:Loco:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Feb 2011 12:47 #15 by LadyJazzer
Looks to me like RT is slipping further and further into insanity.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Feb 2011 13:02 #16 by Photo-fish

LadyJazzer wrote: Looks to me like RT is slipping further and further into insanity.


That is pretty sad. Should RT be humanely put down or just starved to death? :pop

According to RT, only libs love, respect and pamper their pets.

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Feb 2011 13:13 #17 by LadyJazzer
I think starving to death would be appropriate....somehow....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Feb 2011 18:17 #18 by Mayhem
I would pay this guy to starve libs. Maybe they would then STFU

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Feb 2011 20:12 #19 by Residenttroll returns

CinnamonGirl wrote:

residenttroll wrote:

CinnamonGirl wrote:
Animals and Children depend on adults and we need to take that seriously. It is his fault for even taking on the responsibility if he could not do it.


Are you stupid? Animals don't need humans. Geez, are the liberals just getting more stupid by the day or am I just getting impatient with their non-sense.


Dogs have been bred to stay almost as puppies so we can train them and use them for certain jobs. They are not wild anymore. We have a responsibility for pets. Animals in the wild are a different story unless we take them out of it. If we make it to where they do not have the resources for themselves then it is up to us. RT are you sick or something?

:Loco:


I see your point...liberals have been bred to stay stupid and we use them for certain government funded jobs. We have a responsibility to liberals. Liberals in the wild are a different story...they just stay in Boulder. If we make it to where they do not have the financial resources for themselve they would starve looking for real jobs. CG are you socialist or something?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Feb 2011 20:13 #20 by Residenttroll returns

Baileyboy wrote: I would pay this guy to starve libs. Maybe they would then STFU


Starve a liberal...take away their government entitlements.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.168 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+