I think there is a big difference between the humane putting down of a bunch of cats due to an illness, and leaving a bunch of animals - of any kind - caged, fenced or tied up and leaving them to starve to death, or barely feeding them enough to sustain a minimum of life in pain and suffering. That's just a cruel mind and cruel behavior. If he couldn't support those dogs anymore, he had many other avenues rather than just leaving them there tied up. Of course, only one is sanctioned -finding them new homes - but he could have released them, he could have even shot them. But he didn't - he chose to leave them to starve.
THAT level or cruelty deserves more jail time.
They're only dogs - they're only old people with dementia and senility. See how easy it is to make that cross over? And old folks are equally abused and starved.
ANY level of purposeful cruelty is fully unacceptable- to any one or any thing.
CinnamonGirl wrote:
Animals and Children depend on adults and we need to take that seriously. It is his fault for even taking on the responsibility if he could not do it.
Are you stupid? Animals don't need humans. Geez, are the liberals just getting more stupid by the day or am I just getting impatient with their non-sense.
Local_Historian wrote: leaving a bunch of animals - of any kind - caged, fenced or tied up and leaving them to starve to death, or barely feeding them enough to sustain a minimum of life in pain and suffering. That's just a cruel mind and cruel behavior.
Question: Do you go out and feed the bears when the forest experiences a drought and they can't find enough food? If not, you have a cruel mind and cruel behavior. By the way, I hear the bears are REALLY hungry.
CinnamonGirl wrote:
Animals and Children depend on adults and we need to take that seriously. It is his fault for even taking on the responsibility if he could not do it.
Are you stupid? Animals don't need humans. Geez, are the liberals just getting more stupid by the day or am I just getting impatient with their non-sense.
Dogs have been bred to stay almost as puppies so we can train them and use them for certain jobs. They are not wild anymore. We have a responsibility for pets. Animals in the wild are a different story unless we take them out of it. If we make it to where they do not have the resources for themselves then it is up to us. RT are you sick or something?
CinnamonGirl wrote:
Animals and Children depend on adults and we need to take that seriously. It is his fault for even taking on the responsibility if he could not do it.
Are you stupid? Animals don't need humans. Geez, are the liberals just getting more stupid by the day or am I just getting impatient with their non-sense.
Dogs have been bred to stay almost as puppies so we can train them and use them for certain jobs. They are not wild anymore. We have a responsibility for pets. Animals in the wild are a different story unless we take them out of it. If we make it to where they do not have the resources for themselves then it is up to us. RT are you sick or something?
:Loco:
I see your point...liberals have been bred to stay stupid and we use them for certain government funded jobs. We have a responsibility to liberals. Liberals in the wild are a different story...they just stay in Boulder. If we make it to where they do not have the financial resources for themselve they would starve looking for real jobs. CG are you socialist or something?