Charlie Sheen

PrintSmith wrote:

Baileyboy wrote: First off I ain't your boy, biatch. Secondly, if you had spent any time outside the borders of this country you would realize Americans flunk spelling of regular English on a constant basis, so you are hardly in a position to be talking about how to spell slang verbiage, the etemology of which you know nothing. Thirdly, I have forgotten more about how to treat "real" ladies than you will ever comprehend. So save your lark for someone who actually gives a s... Now you piss off back to your idol worship of fish face. I'm done with you.

PS. This thread is about Charlie. A real man who has issues but ain't about to be co-opted by the new castrati like you and your ilk.

The etymology (etomology is the study of bugs, etymology is the origin of words, etemology is neither) of the word 'wuss' is a cross between a wimp and a rather unpleasant reference to female genitalia. Where in the world you came up with woos (the meaning of which is courting, as in Obama woos voters) is beyond me. I know that teachers encourage young children to spell phonetically until they know better, but most adults outgrow that childish proclivity, which only adds additional evidence that you have yet to acquire any maturity in thought or action. Children are also given to fits and inappropriate expressions of their anger. Notch one more in the column of adolescence for yourself.

You see son, adults are able to master their emotions rather than succumbing to their emotions mastering them. That, too, is indicative that one has reached manhood and is no longer a child. I guess by the evidence thus far, that also leaves you shy of the mark you so desperately wish to obtain. There is hope for you though Baileyboy. With time and practice it is still something you can obtain. I'm happy to continue to provide you with the lessons you either have ignored thus far or were never taught. It takes a village to raise a child after all.

You got me. A spelling error. Woohoo!!!

Entomology is the study of insects. (what is etomology?)


woos

someone who is a wimp; afraid to do something that he should do

"Our new wide receiver is a real woos".

[url=http://www.urbandictionary.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;]http://www.urbandictionary.com[/url]


Like I told you arsehole, slang has no "correct" spelling. That is why it is slang.

And unlike you I don't need a dictionary to figure out the difference between a lady, a woman and a liberal biatch.

So what you're saying Printsmith, is that Baileyboy is acting out because he likes the spankings?

towermonkey wrote: So what you're saying Printsmith, is that Baileyboy is acting out because he likes the spankings?

What he is proving is he crept out from under the rock next to the one you crept out from under. Geddit?

Baileyboy wrote:

towermonkey wrote: So what you're saying Printsmith, is that Baileyboy is acting out because he likes the spankings?

What he is proving is he crept out from under the rock next to the one you crept out from under. Geddit?

That's really the best response you can come up with? Go back to googling insults - your originality is coming up short.

towermonkey wrote:

Baileyboy wrote:

towermonkey wrote: So what you're saying Printsmith, is that Baileyboy is acting out because he likes the spankings?

What he is proving is he crept out from under the rock next to the one you crept out from under. Geddit?

That's really the best response you can come up with? Go back to googling insults - your originality is coming up short.

You obviously have insult confused with fact. You might also get yourself a dictionary seeing as definitions aren't your strong suit either.

Pardon if I interrupt BB's grade school repartee...

Martin Ent Inc wrote: Charlie Sheen 47, is all over the news because he's a celebrity drug addict. While David R Fahey 23, Krisopther Gould 25, Andrew Wilfahrt 31, Brian Tabada 21, Rudolph Hizon 22, Chauncy Mays 25 are all soldiers who gave their lives this week with no media mention.

Got this from just a quick Google of one soldier's name:

Fort Polk soldier from Calif. dies in Afgahnistan
San Jose Mercury News - ‎Mar 2, 2011‎
AP FORT POLK, La.—The US Defense Department says an attack using an improvised bomb has killed a soldier from California who was assigned to Fort Polk and serving in Afghanistan. A news release says 22-year-old Specialist Rudolph R. Hizon, ...

Soldiers From East Texas, Fort Polk Killed In Afghanistan
KTBS - ‎Mar 2, 2011‎
A soldier from Titus County, Texas, and another stationed at Fort Polk have been killed in separate attacks in Afghanistan. Staff Sgt. Chauncy Mays, 25, of Cookville, Texas, was one of two soldiers killed Monday after enemy forces attacked their unit ...

10th Mountain Division Soldier killed in Afghanistan
Syracuse.com - Dave Tobin - ‎Mar 2, 2011‎
Spc. Rudolph R. Hizon, 22, of Los Angeles, Ca., was killed Feb. 28, in Logar province, Afghanistan, when insurgents attacked his unit using an improvised explosive device. He was an infantryman with the 2nd Battalion, ...

10th Mountain Division Soldier Stationed at Fort Polk Killed after IED Attack
MyABC50.com - Holly Boname - ‎Mar 2, 2011‎
A 10th Mountain Division Solider stationed at Fort Polk , Louisiana , was killed Monday, February 28, in Logar province, Afghanistan , after suffering wounds from an insurgent attack on his unit, who used improvised explosive devices. ...

Fort Polk soldier killed in action in Afghanistan
NOLA.com - Paul Purpura - ‎Mar 2, 2011‎
A soldier based at Fort Polk has been killed in Afghanistan, the Defense Department announced today. Spc. Rudolph R. Hizon, 22, of Los Angeles, Calif., died Monday in Logar province, according to a Defense Department ...

10th Mountain soldier-Ft. Polk-killed by enemy insurgents in Logar Province
Examiner.com - Susy Raybon - ‎Mar 2, 2011‎
Officials at the Department of Defense announced today the death of a soldier who was supporting Operation Enduring Freedom, Afghanistan. Specialist Rudolph R. Hizon 22, of Los Angeles, California, died Feb. 28,2011, in Logar province, Afghanistan, ...

(Plus, also got the same comment you posted word-for-word on several sites)

Baileyboy wrote: woos

someone who is a wimp; afraid to do something that he should do
"Our new wide receiver is a real woos".
[url=http://www.urbandictionary.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;]http://www.urbandictionary.com[/url]

Like I told you arsehole, slang has no "correct" spelling. That is why it is slang.

Funny, even your own source identifies it as a misspelling -

Woos
Common misspelling of wuss (see also woose)

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=woos

So you see boy, even slang has a correct, and an incorrect, spelling. The urban dictionary simply accommodates those who have not yet outgrown the childish habit of spelling phonetically. Perfectly understandable as it is a term that would usually be used by those who are too lazy and immature to apply themselves to becoming educated instead of remaining in their current state of ignorance. Which, as pointed out earlier, is one of the problems you seem to be suffering from. You continue to ignorantly hold the belief that chest thumping and name calling is essential to being a man and that it demonstrates desirable traits in a man. I'm trying to help you understand son that this is not the case at all, and in fact the opposite is true. Engaging is such activity tells others that you are holding onto your immaturity and adolescence rather than growing into adulthood. Your persistence in this behavior will only cement that belief in their minds.

The best course of action for you here is to simply admit that you made a mistake which you now regret when you assailed the person rather than their opinions, views and beliefs. I'm sure that LJ would even thank you for your apology and be willing to revise her current opinion regarding the nature of your character given the outstanding character she possesses. To err is human boy, we all make mistakes from time to time in letting our passions run unchecked. What separates the men from the boys is the ability to recognize the mistake and correct it rather than refuse to acknowledge that they have made a mistake at all. By continually attempting to portray yourself as correct when the proof of your mistake is easily pointed out, as you did by neglecting to include the definition I have supplied from the very site you linked to, you are only further exposing the lack of maturity that precludes you from being considered as a man in the eyes of society.

Like I said lad, I'm trying to help you here. You can continue to be embarrassed and publicly humiliated or you can admit to the mistake and correct it. The choice is yours.

PrintSmith wrote:

Baileyboy wrote: woos

someone who is a wimp; afraid to do something that he should do
"Our new wide receiver is a real woos".
[url=http://www.urbandictionary.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;]http://www.urbandictionary.com[/url]

Like I told you arsehole, slang has no "correct" spelling. That is why it is slang.

Funny, even your own source identifies it as a misspelling -

Woos
Common misspelling of wuss (see also woose)

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=woos

So you see boy, even slang has a correct, and an incorrect, spelling. The urban dictionary simply accommodates those who have not yet outgrown the childish habit of spelling phonetically. Perfectly understandable as it is a term that would usually be used by those who are too lazy and immature to apply themselves to becoming educated instead of remaining in their current state of ignorance. Which, as pointed out earlier, is one of the problems you seem to be suffering from. You continue to ignorantly hold the belief that chest thumping and name calling is essential to being a man and that it demonstrates desirable traits in a man. I'm trying to help you understand son that this is not the case at all, and in fact the opposite is true. Engaging is such activity tells others that you are holding onto your immaturity and adolescence rather than growing into adulthood. Your persistence in this behavior will only cement that belief in their minds.

The best course of action for you here is to simply admit that you made a mistake which you now regret when you assailed the person rather than their opinions, views and beliefs. I'm sure that LJ would even thank you for your apology and be willing to revise her current opinion regarding the nature of your character given the outstanding character she possesses. To err is human boy, we all make mistakes from time to time in letting our passions run unchecked. What separates the men from the boys is the ability to recognize the mistake and correct it rather than refuse to acknowledge that they have made a mistake at all. By continually attempting to portray yourself as correct when the proof of your mistake is easily pointed out, as you did by neglecting to include the definition I have supplied from the very site you linked to, you are only further exposing the lack of maturity that precludes you from being considered as a man in the eyes of society.

Like I said lad, I'm trying to help you here. You can continue to be embarrassed and publicly humiliated or you can admit to the mistake and correct it. The choice is yours.

Get back to your blowup goat. Maybe it is impressed. Your drone is boring and of as much interest as VL's food pics.

I guess it would a complete waste of time to even bother writing, Grow Up, BB, but heck why not?

Let me be the first to assure you lad that the exchange between us has been quite entertaining to everyone but yourself and will continue to be so for as long as your miscreant behavior persists. You would have been much better off correcting your mistake when it was first pointed out. Check the results of your own poll when you reply to this post. Despite the disagreement with her politics, and many times her demeanor, the votes for Sheen ended the moment I challenged the malicious nature of your thread. It was at that point that your charade ended lad, you simply have been so intent on continuing in your adolescent fit that you have not noticed it yet.

You have already lost the battle here Baileyboy, the poll shows that quite clearly. The only question that remains is how long it is going to take for you to be a man about it and stop defending what is indefensible. You can choose to do what is right at any point here son, but harbor no illusions that your belligerent refusal to do so alters the state of things in the slightest. You've been defeated boy. I did what was right for a man to do and the results of your poll clearly show that. Right now folks are looking at this thread simply to see how long it takes you to figure that out for yourself and amusing themselves at the amount of public humiliation you are bringing upon yourself while that knowledge remains elusive.