Ayers not joking about Obama book royalties
On the morning of March 24, "Jim" emailed Ayers at his University of Illinois at Chicago address: "Jack Cashill's new book makes an overwhelming case that you wrote 'Dreams from My Father.' In addition it recounts an encounter with a blogger, Anne Leary, in October 2009 at Reagan airport where you acknowledged to her that you wrote the book."
Jim continued, "Why don't you just go public with a straightforward statement about your role?"
As it happens, this was the same day Ayers was to speak at Montclair State. Jim was not connected to the group videotaping Ayers at Montclair and knew nothing of its strategy. His email may well have prompted Ayers' videotaped claim of authorship.
Ayers responded politely to Jim an hour later, "As you note in you letter, I did indeed acknowledge that I wrote the book to Anne at Reagan, and over and over since then. So what more do you want me to do?"
Obama most probably will be a one-termer, don't ya think?
This is current news because Ayers was speaking last week at Montclair State University. And if we post to the older threads on slightly different topics, you say that it is "old" news.
Admit it. You do not care that Obama is not qualitied to be president. You do not respect our Constitution or our form of government. If you elect a fraud it does not matter to you.
major bean wrote: This is current news because Ayers was speaking last week at Montclair State University. And if we post to the older threads on slightly different topics, you say that it is "old" news.
Admit it. You do not care that Obama is not qualitied to be president. You do not respect our Constitution or our form of government. If you elect a fraud it does not matter to you.
admit it.....you don't care if any of this is true or not....your sole purpose it to smear Obama with anything you can find and see if it sticks....you all have draggged some of the most ridiculous stuff in here from the web...never bother to do any kind of search to see if it's true, never appear to care if it is proven or not....just slap it into a post and bait the liberals. You don't respect the constitution, or the truth, or our justice system.....Obama has been guilty until proven innocent with the righties here from the day he was elected.
The right wing posters here have cried wolf at least a hundred too many times, I wouldn't believe a thing you post off the web without verification.
Once again, if you want to make the OP look bad, would it not be much more satisfying to prove him wrong instead of whining about the topic? It's like a boxer with a big mouth who stands on the outside of the ropes taunting but never actually engaging his opponent. It is sort of fun to watch though.
I will say that at least LJ comes back occasionally with some Huff Post article to throw a counter punch...occasionally.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
major bean wrote: This is current news because Ayers was speaking last week at Montclair State University. And if we post to the older threads on slightly different topics, you say that it is "old" news.
Admit it. You do not care that Obama is not qualitied to be president. You do not respect our Constitution or our form of government. If you elect a fraud it does not matter to you.
admit it.....you don't care if any of this is true or not....your sole purpose it to smear Obama with anything you can find and see if it sticks....you all have draggged some of the most ridiculous stuff in here from the web...never bother to do any kind of search to see if it's true, never appear to care if it is proven or not....just slap it into a post and bait the liberals. You don't respect the constitution, or the truth, or our justice system.....Obama has been guilty until proven innocent with the righties here from the day he was elected.
The right wing posters here have cried wolf at least a hundred too many times, I wouldn't believe a thing you post off the web without verification.
The truth (or something near it) will eventually be forced from Obama. You are saying that the questions must not be asked because Obama does not want to answer them.
It is up to Obama to prove that he is elligible to be president, not for the public to prove that he is not elligible. You have it backwards, archer.
I believe once he was deemed eligible to run for president, then elected....the burden of proof is on those who would question it.....it is you who have it backwards.
