Jukerado, thank you for the clarification on arming for defense as opposed to offense. I had a feeling that was what you meant, and that works for me.
Ashley, I don't think we need to do nothing; on the contrary, I think there is much
good that we could do. When it's all said and done, it's an individual who chooses violence, usually one who is desperate, angry, lonely, fearful, envious, or greedy. When you sit down and listen to try to figure out what your enemy's emotional motivation is, perhaps there is another solution that can be found that won't continue to feed the cycle of violence.
- People who are starving are desperate and will do anything for their loved ones - help them grow food and create potable water.
- People who are angry at the loss of a loved one will act out in anger at those they hold responsible - hold those accountable who have acted illegally and change policies to end the path of death.
- People who envy others for what they have can be helped up with loans and education, relief efforts, infrastructure building - improvements in quality of life.
- People who are fearful that their way of life is coming to an end, or that they are being targeted and persecuted, will become defensive if they see no plan of action that seems do-able or fair.
Happy people, those who feel life is fair, who have enough to eat, who feel they can make a way for themselves without persecution, and provide a better life for their children are
not people who strap suicide vests to their chests. Build those people up, create more of those people and the terrorist organizations will find no new recruits from which to draw.
That is how you defeat ISIS, because otherwise they have an endless supply of the general population from which to draw and you cannot kill entire nations.
It doesn't always have to come down to bombing nations, or calling to eliminate entire ethnic or religious groups. We have perpetuated a cycle of violence, going back
several presidencies on
both sides of the aisle, and by doing so we have given motivation to those who would likely have not done harm otherwise because they are now angry, hurt, desperate. Those who would do evil use those emotions to recruit and motivate. That's why I shared the picture above that I did - you cannot stop hate with more hate, and it takes the stronger party to sit down, listen to the other side, and make a better choice to help, not hurt. It's easy to retaliate and cause harm back, that's the action of the weak and the desperate.
America is better than that.
On the absurd American response to the violence in France by Astronautalis
:
Here in France, the streets are full, partly out of routine, and partially out of defiance. This is a very proud people, and i find myself circumspect and heart broken when i hear them speak about last nights events. And yet, i am endlessly inspired and moved by their strength in the face of it all.
Personally, i have had very conflicted feelings, watching the American response to all of this. <snip> I have always been very cynical about hashtag "slacktivism", and the politicization of tragedy, but seeing it from this angle, it appears astoundingly narcissistic and self serving. No matter how much we watch the news, how much we pour over twitter, we don't have the whole story, and we are totally incapable of providing an answer. And I think it is high time we all stop pretending that we have one.
This is not your time to shine. This is not your time to finally win some argument you are having with the universe in your head. This is a time for empathy, and solidarity. Let's all take a break from the sloganeering, take a note from the French playbook, and live the ever loving sh** out of our lives.
For, there is no greater act of defiance.
"The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.“
-Albert Camus
(emphasis mine)
If you'd like to help in a direct way:
www.bustle.com/articles/123798-how-to-he...matter-where-you-are