- Posts: 2915
- Thank you received: 3
pretty cooldaisypusher wrote:
On Dec. 6th, a magnetic filament stretching more than 700,000 km around the sun's southeastern limb erupted, producing a blast of epic proportions
http://spaceweather.com/images2010/06dec10/epicblast2.gif?PHPSESSID=qhnecot3dg2f76jtp7c1rotma0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The consumption of a food typically leads to a decrease in its subsequent intake through habituation—a decrease in one’s responsiveness to the food and motivation to obtain it. We demonstrated that habituation to a food item can occur even when its consumption is merely imagined. Five experiments showed that people who repeatedly imagined eating a food (such as cheese) many times subsequently consumed less of the imagined food than did people who repeatedly imagined eating that food fewer times, imagined eating a different food (such as candy), or did not imagine eating a food. They did so because they desired to eat it less, not because they considered it less palatable. These results suggest that mental representation alone can engender habituation to a stimulus.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The Runners-Up http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6011/1605.shortUntil now, all machines have moved according to the not-surprising laws of classical mechanics, which govern the motion of everyday objects. In contrast, a tiny machine unveiled this year jiggles in ways explicable only by the weird rules of quantum mechanics, which ordinarily govern molecules, atoms, and subatomic particles. The proto-quantum machine opens the way to myriad experimental devices and perhaps tests of our sense of reality. That potential and the ingenuity of the experiment make it the Breakthrough of the Year.
Areas to Watch in 2011 http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6011/1608.3.shortA synthetic genome inserted into a bacterium in place of the organism's original DNA and the two-thirds-complete Neandertal genome sequence topped the list of this year's runners-up for Breakthrough of the Year. Other notable discoveries included next-generation genomics, souped-up cellular reprogramming, exome sequencing, quantum simulators, molecular dynamics simulations, knockout rats, and HIV prophylaxis.
In 2011, Science's editors will be watching a smaller detector at the Large Hadron Collider called LHCb, which will study B mesons in great detail; new techniques that should lead to the discovery of many more genes contributing to adaptation; an ignited fusion burn at the National Ignition Facility; broadly neutralizing antibodies, which are capable of disabling a wide range of viral variants; the first plug-in hybrid electric cars whose batteries are charged from a wall socket go on the market; and the results of the first phase III trial of a malaria vaccine.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
My faves:Every year, ScienceNOW compiles a Top 10 list of our favorite and most popular stories. As usual, the 2010 batch is an eclectic mix. And this year's list contains something special: our most popular story of all time.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
when the flume sediments were almost or fully saturated, the landslide grew explosively, in some cases ending up with four times the momentum of the original sediment dump (see video). In these cases, sensors revealed, the pressure of the overriding material boosted water pressure in the underlying sediments in less than 1 second, nearly liquefying them and dramatically decreasing any friction that might slow down the flow. As a result, flume sediments eroded and joined the accelerating, ever-swelling flow.
Many scientists have long suspected that water plays a big role in landslide behavior, says Anne Mangeney, a geophysicist at the Institute of Geophysics of Paris, who wasn't involved in the research. But until now, she notes, no one had come up with hard data to quantify the effect.
The idea to guard against this year's BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico by building offshore sand berms was controversial from the start, and scientists voiced many concerns about the project. A new report (pdf) from a presidential commission investigating the spill now reveals how intense political pressure overrode experts' concerns that the berms would be ineffective--which ultimately proved correct.
Although Louisiana's governor, Bobby Jindal, has publicly declared success, the report, released yesterday, concludes otherwise. "From the perspective of the Commission staff, however, $220 million for a spill response measure that trapped not much more than 1,000 barrels of oil is not a compelling cost-benefit tradeoff," it says. With just 1000 barrels of oil collected—compared with as much as 1.85 million collected via other methods—the presidential commission concludes that the berms "were not a success." The reason they got built, the commission concludes, is because politics got the best of science.
Seventeen months late on meeting the deadline set in a March 2009 order from President Barack Obama, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) today released high-level guidance for federal agencies on how to develop policies on scientific integrity. The guidance, which includes a prohibition on political interference, is being received warmly but somewhat cautiously by advocacy groups.
The guidance includes the following points:
* "Political officials should not suppress or alter scientific or technological findings."
* Data used for policy decisions should "undergo independent peer review by qualified experts, where feasible and appropriate."
* Agencies should set clear standards for dealing with conflict of interest and adopt whistleblower protections.
* Agencies should expand and promote access to scientific information by making it available online.
* There should be principles for communicating science to the public, such as explaining uncertainties and describing the probabilities of best- and worst-case scenarios.
* Federal scientists can speak to the media and public about their research "with appropriate coordination with their immediate supervisor and their public affairs office."
* Agencies should facilitate professional development of scientists, such as encouraging publication of results and presentations at meetings.
A presentation at the American Geophysical Union here yesterday offered preliminary findings from a 5-year project to map the subglacial topography of East Antarctic. And while ICECAP will add to the growing evidence that much more of the East Antarctic ice sheet sits below sea level than had once been thought, how the researchers were able to get there is a story in and of itself.
The scientists came up with a proposal for NSF to pay the salaries of U.S. researchers involved in the project, while the U.K. National Environment Research Council would provide logistical and scientific support, including a World War II-era plane and ground support. The Australian government, which operates a base with two ice runways on the Aurora Basin, was also interested in the project. The total cost of the project is about $1 million a year, incredibly cheap by Antarctic standards because the team was able to avoid the need for expensive C-130 flights by relying on coastal bases that are supplied by ship.
And while vast amounts of data must still be collected and analyzed, the bottom line is already clear. "Much more of the bottom of East Antarctica is below sea level than we expected," he said, "and significant portions are in contact with the ocean." Those findings suggest that East Antarctica is much more susceptible to climate change than scientists had once thought.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Robert Sapolsky, Professor of Neurology at Stanford University, has been studying stress in wild baboons for more than three decades. And he found there are two powerful predictors of who will be most affected by stress. Personality plays a huge role. Can you tell the difference between a big threat and minor issue? If it is big can you figure out a way to get some control over it? If there’s a bad outcome do you have a coping mechanism? If you can answer yes to these it’s a good bet you’ve got relatively low stress.
Beyond personality traits, the single best predictor of an ability to deal well with stress is how socially connected you are. Baboons who had strong relationships also had low glucocorticoid levels and outlived the more isolated baboons by about three years.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Start reading more books to your kids! :thumbsup:As you get jostled in the daily rough and tumble, does it feel like other people care less about how rough you have it and how much you’re getting tumbled? Because according to an article in Scientific American Mind magazine, analysis of surveys of college kids reveals that self-reported empathy has been dropping for the last 30 years. And empathy really took a nosedive in the last 10 years.
One possible explanation is social isolation—we tend to do more things on our own and engage in fewer group activities than we used to. Another possible cause is a decrease in reading fiction for pleasure. Studies have found that the number of stories preschoolers read correlates with their ability to understand other people’s emotional states. The good news is that if empathy can go down, it can also go back up. You feel me?
We are (fortunately) not alone: Humans provide residence to numerous microbial communities comprising hundreds of individual bacterial species. Although teleological design may predict that the immune system evolved to eliminate infectious microbes, we now know that almost every environmentally exposed surface of our bodies is teeming with symbiotic microbes (Fig. 1). These polymicrobial communities contribute profoundly to the architecture and function of the tissues they inhabit and thus play an important role in the balance between health and disease.
Understanding human coevolution with our microbiota may lead to a philosophical and conceptual redefinition of the microbial world and may yield clinical advances toward the treatment of autoimmunity and inflammatory diseases by harnessing the immunomodulatory properties of human commensal bacteria.
Some neuroscientists dedicate their careers to the workings of individual neurons. Others choose a higher scale: they might, for example, look at how the hippocampus, a cluster of millions of neurons, encodes memories. Others might look at the brain at an even higher scale, observing all the regions that become active when we perform a particular task, such as reading or feeling fear. But few have tried to contemplate the brain on its many scales at once. Their reticence stems, in part, from the sheer scope of the challenge. The interactions between just a few neurons can be a confusing thicket of feedbacks. Add 100 billion more neurons to the problem, and the endeavor turns into a cosmic headache.
Yet some neuroscientists think it is time to tackle the challenge. They argue that we will never truly understand how the mind emerges from our nervous system if we break the brain down into disconnected pieces. Looking only at the parts would be like trying to figure out how water freezes by studying a single water molecule. “Ice” is a meaningless term on the scale of individual molecules. It emerges only from the interaction of a vast number of molecules, as they collectively lock into crystals.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.