Vice Lord wrote: Friends, it's come to my attention that somebody, for finaicial gain is plagurizing my posts and opinions here-so I've incorporated and I need to post this before I make another posting. My lawyers made me do it
These posts and opinions are the sole property of The Vice Lord™® and are the copyrighted work of The Vice Lord™® and/or the Third Party Providers. Except as stated herein, none of the Materials may be copied, reproduced, distributed, republished, downloaded, displayed, posted or transmitted in any form or by any means, including, but not limited to, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior express written permission of The Vice Lord™® or the Third Party Provider, aka 285Bound Administrators.
The Vice Lord is not a registered name yet. Just thought I'd let you know.
" I'll try anything once, twice if I like it, three times to make sure. " Mae West
One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:
The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
The nature of the copyrighted work
The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
So tell us what rights granted by copyright are we infringing upon by quoting any of your anal entries on a public forum? Section 107 certainly leaves ample room for us to have as much fun as we wish to. Personally, I post this only for others and entertainment value for myself at your expense.
HEARTLESS wrote: The first turd down the drain doesn't indicate it has followers, its just first out, first flushed.
19,087 on Twiitter
The numbers...They don't lie
Can you ever forgive us? and your twitter name so we can triple your followers?
Please refrain from quoting me please- read my signature
You are the biggest laughing stock on here! I will copy and paste ANYTHING and EVERYTHING I want that you post on this OPEN and PUBLIC forum! Your signature is a joke!
These posted opinions are the property of The Vice Lord™® and are the copyrighted work of The Vice Lord™® and/or the Third Party Providers. Except as stated herein, none of the Materials may be copied, reproduced, distributed, republished, downloaded, displayed, posted or transmitted in any form or by any means, including, but not limited to, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior express written permission of The Vice Lord™® or the 3rd Party Provider
Can I copy your signature please? ...Opps I already did! Sue me you pansy little prick!
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
Rockdoc Franz wrote: Once again a total lack of comprehension.
One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:
The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
The nature of the copyrighted work
The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
So tell us what rights granted by copyright are we infringing upon by quoting any of your anal entries on a public forum? Section 107 certainly leaves ample room for us to have as much fun as we wish to. Personally, I post this only for others and entertainment value for myself at your expense.
Like I told everyone before: Technically, quoteing me doesn't violate my disclaimer but it certainly violates the spirit of the disclaimer so i'm asking you nicely not to do it because once you do quote me, then you own the rights to the entire post including the quote from me. It's just a sneaky, low down, rotten way to circumvent my copyrights..
