Newt Gingrich Announces Presidential Run on Facebook,Twitter

09 May 2011 12:01 #1 by CinnamonGirl

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 12:32 #2 by FredHayek
I won't be giving him any money or support. Sleazeball. Makes Trump look good.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 12:40 #3 by LadyJazzer
Perhaps he will be able to give us a lecture on "The sanctity of marriage"?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 15:30 #4 by Nmysys
Liberals didn't give a damn about the sanctimony of marriage when Clinton was in office, why would they now? Oh, I see, it is because Gingrich is a Republican.

You haven't had anything nice to say about any of the Republicans that are or could run, why would anyone expect that you would start now?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 15:34 #5 by LadyJazzer
Why would I say anything nice about a Republican? I'm a Democrat, and every one of the current crop of Republicans is a joke.


(Psssst: Clinton isn't running...)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 15:35 #6 by CinnamonGirl
Nymysis the answer I always get is at least he admitted he was a philanderer.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 15:37 #7 by LadyJazzer
A blow-job is hardly in the same category as cheating on two previous about-to-be-divorced ex-wives, with about-to-be-next-wives while trying to claim the high-road in marital sanctity... But it's fun to watch you try.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 15:39 #8 by Kate

Nmysys wrote: Liberals didn't give a damn about the sanctimony of marriage when Clinton was in office, why would they now? Oh, I see, it is because Gingrich is a Republican.

You haven't had anything nice to say about any of the Republicans that are or could run, why would anyone expect that you would start now?


I think the issue here is that Gingrich ran as a Congressman on moral values, family values, that sort of stuff. Clinton never ran on that specific of a platform, so there's less hypocrisy there.

In addition, it turns out (if I remember correctly) that Gingrich was having an affair with a member of his staff while the impeachment of Clinton was occurring. See the hypocrisy there?

Gingrich is just slimy all the way around. He's going to lose big time.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 15:39 #9 by CinnamonGirl
Here we go again. I don't care about this for any other reason except LJ, your logic doesn't make sense. LOL Screwing around is screwing around. Blow jobs or whatever. Jeez. Claiming the high road might be a defense. LOL

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 May 2011 15:43 #10 by JMC
Hypocrisy is the issue, dems don't pretend to be holy , only repubs have the baggage of self righteousness that they ( or noboby else) can't live up too.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.142 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+