Why Is He Bi? (Sigh) Maureen Dowd

..............."With each equivocation, the man in the Oval Office shields his identity and cloaks who the real Barack Obama is.

He should draw inspiration from the gay community: one thing gays have to do, after all, is declare who they are at all costs.

On some of the most important issues facing this nation, it is time for the president to come out of the closet. "



http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/opini ... 6dowd.html

Great piece from the "communist columnist" and "left-wing NYT."

So how come you believe this but dismiss other things she writes when it involves conservatives?

WayneH wrote: Great piece from the "communist columnist" and "left-wing NYT."

So how come you believe this but dismiss other things she writes when it involves conservatives?

And where pray tell have I done ether?

I applaud her integrity for doing something besides parroting left wing talking points.

Oh, I didn't realize. So you haven't dismissed her other columns... You believe them and think she's right on?

WayneH wrote: Oh, I didn't realize. So you haven't dismissed her other columns... You believe them and think she's right on?

Why don't you start a thread about her columns instead of trying to derail this one?

What, are you the 285Bound forum police now?

If you want moderated discussions, go to Pinecam.

Why not just answer the question and quit deflecting?

Wayne, even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while. Why do any of the other articles by this person mean this is or isn't accurate?

WayneH wrote: What, are you the 285Bound forum police now?

If you want moderated discussions, go to Pinecam.

Why not just answer the question and quit deflecting?

WayneH wrote: [Oh wait, it's another strawman argument. I get it.

LOL, I've even agreed with LJ once or twice. That certainly does NOT imply that I agree with her all the time! :yikes:

HEARTLESS wrote: Wayne, even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while. Why do any of the other articles by this person mean this is or isn't accurate?

Yeah, but your side decides which "nuts" it finds. This person is a columnist who gives her opinion. When her opinion doesn't fit yours, she's not accurate. When it does, she's very accurate. Go figure.

I just want to know why conservatives call the MSM liberal and don't accept posts on here with references to MSM articles because they're "biased" but don't mind using them as sources when it's convenient?

Reminds me of Nmysys claiming Snopes is biased, in order not to accept facts reported by them, but then using Snopes as a reference when it fits his viewpoint? Or El Rushbo slamming the "drive-by media" as biased, but then reading from MSM articles to bolster points he is trying to make on the air.