death of the Democratic Party

11 Jul 2011 15:02 #61 by LadyJazzer
Who should he have been creating jobs for?...The American people... Obviously, the millionaires & billionaires had all that extra cash, so they didn't need any more help... Clinton created 23.1 Million in 8 years...and that was with the PRE-Bush tax-rate levels...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Jul 2011 15:08 #62 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic death of the Democratic Party

LadyJazzer wrote: Who should he have been creating jobs for?...The American people... Obviously, the millionaires & billionaires had all that extra cash, so they didn't need any more help... Clinton created 23.1 Million in 8 years...and that was with the PRE-Bush tax-rate levels...

That's funny, I thought citizens who risked their labor and capital created jobs...silly me.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Jul 2011 15:12 #63 by LadyJazzer
Clinton created 23.1 Million in 8 years...and that was with the PRE-Bush tax-rate levels... So, Bush could only create 8 million in 8 years, after giving all those "job-creators" those tax-breaks?... That's funny, I thought people who got all that extra money from tax-breaks were supposed to take their capital and labor and create jobs, too... What happened?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Jul 2011 15:12 #64 by BearMtnHIB
Here's a article that came out today- maybe Obama is starting to get the message, but I think it's already too late for him.

In a Chamber of Commerce survey of executives running small businesses that make $25 million or less, 79% of those who responded said they believed federal regulations are unreasonable, and 85% of responders said they were worried about the impact of regulations on their businesses.

In a nod to Big Business, President Obama on Monday issued an executive order asking independent agencies to rid their books of old and outdated regulations.

The White House made a similar request earlier this year to agencies it oversees. The new order asks agencies that don't answer to the White House to join in this call to cut red tape.

"We are taking immediate steps to eliminate millions of hours in annual paperwork burdens for large and small business and save more than a $1 billion in annual regulatory costs," said Obama in a memo accompanying the order.

The order, which was delivered to independent agencies on Monday, signals the White House's sensitivity to complaints lobbed by big business groups and Republicans -- that bureaucratic red tape and new rules are putting a crunch on job creation.


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Obama-orders-removal-of-cnnm-2802034740.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=4&asset=&ccode=

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Jul 2011 15:15 #65 by JMC
Replied by JMC on topic death of the Democratic Party
Consumer demand and exports drive investment. Taxes have very little to do with it. Big myth.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Jul 2011 15:22 #66 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic death of the Democratic Party

jmc wrote: Consumer demand and exports drive investment. Taxes have very little to do with it. Big myth.



S

CriticalBill wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: Who should he have been creating jobs for?...The American people... Obviously, the millionaires & billionaires had all that extra cash, so they didn't need any more help... Clinton created 23.1 Million in 8 years...and that was with the PRE-Bush tax-rate levels...

That's funny, I thought citizens who risked their labor and capital created jobs...silly me.


Tell me how Bill Clinton "created" those jobs. And if the Democraps are so skilled at "creating" jobs (non government), what happened to their magical powers?

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Jul 2011 15:27 #67 by LadyJazzer
If you aren't willing to give any credit to Clinton for "creating" them, then you don't get to blame Obama for NOT "creating them."

The numbers are from the Wall Street Journal's own research. I'm still waiting for an answer:

Clinton created 23.1 Million in 8 years...and that was with the PRE-Bush tax-rate levels... So, Bush could only create 8 million in 8 years, after giving all those "job-creators" those tax-breaks?... That's funny, I thought people who got all that extra money from tax-breaks were supposed to take their capital and labor and create jobs, too... What happened?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Jul 2011 15:29 #68 by JMC
Replied by JMC on topic death of the Democratic Party
Government does not create jobs! They only try to take credit. You can't blame job loss on the Pres or job gains. It is all political BS.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Jul 2011 15:29 #69 by The Viking

LadyJazzer wrote: Who should he have been creating jobs for?...The American people... Obviously, the millionaires & billionaires had all that extra cash, so they didn't need any more help... Clinton created 23.1 Million in 8 years...and that was with the PRE-Bush tax-rate levels...



You are right! The Republicans who controlled congress created all those jobs along with the dot com boom. And Clinton created a stain on a dress and a nasty tasting cigar!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

11 Jul 2011 15:31 #70 by LadyJazzer
Yep... That's part of my point... They either have to give Clinton credit for the 23.1 million jobs created; or they have to stop blaming Obama for the jobs he hasn't been able to create with the legacy he inherited... You can't have it both ways...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.170 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+