You should watch it. It would take way too long to explain it. I think you can online.
All I am saying is whether you are for or against it, the whole MM thing is a dog and pony show. It is a way to do it, without making it legal. We all know that. That really is beside the point. There is nothing scientific about any of it. No stats at all. That is why this is an interesting poll but it would be different everywhere I suspect.
I don't consider myself a pot trafficker. Thanks for the insult. As for big tobacco... would be good for them. Just because there is a BUDWEISER out there does not mean BRECKENRIDGE BREWERY will have no chance at success. If you offer a quality product there will be a demand for it. Look at it as if it were the wine industry, although marijuana has more strains than varieties of wine available, making it even more open for competition. There are plenty of small, yet successful wineries around the country. One right here at the bottom of Kings Valley.
Medicine Man wrote: I don't consider myself a pot trafficker. Thanks for the insult. As for big tobacco... would be good for them. Just because there is a BUDWEISER out there does not mean BRECKENRIDGE BREWERY will have no chance at success. If you offer a quality product there will be a demand for it. Look at it as if it were the wine industry, although marijuana has more strains than varieties of wine available, making it even more open for competition. There are plenty of small, yet successful wineries around the country. One right here at the bottom of Kings Valley.
traffic - trade or deal a commodity; "They trafficked with us for gold"
I don't see too many small time tobacco companies - when this goes mass the state and federal government is going to regulate you out and only the big tobacco companies will have the funds to pay for the regulatory environ. Don't think for a minute Safeway, Kroger (i.e. KS), Eckerds and CVS don't want a piece of the action too.