Enough

archer wrote: I'm surprised that someone so enamoured of Sarah Palin doesn't know that she did NOT quit the governorship to run for Vice President, she quite after she and McCain lost.

True enough - she resigned from the office because her brief brush with national politics resulted in the looney left making her a target, fearful that her ideas and charisma might result in a rise of popularity for the ideas of limited federal government not seen since Reagan was remarking that the misery index, a phrase first coined by Carter when he was running against Ford, was higher after 4 years of Carter's stewardship than it was before he was elected. You can't complete the fundamental transformation from federal to national government when the populace is running around thinking the federal government is too large already after all.

akilina wrote: Palin still draws big crowds wherever she goes and if any of those running having any sense they will want her endorsement.

That dumb woman as so many like to think of her is a pretty smart woman.

Wayne should be so smart.

They didn't call her 'BARRACUDA" for nothing........(In H.S.),she knows EXACTLY what she is doing
and parlays the press adroitly. The problem with the above analysis is this......her credibility is LACKING,along with a BASIC understanding of her short-comings. When "celebrity" becomes the predominant adjective to describe her,the nation has a problem.JMO

Yep her shortcomings has her raking in the dough and in a position to endorse someone. You should be so promising ha

From what I have read and seen from news clips, the numbers at the latest "express" stops have been much lower than the earlier stops. Do you really think she'd give up her touring "dough" and use it to endorse somebody else?

My question to liberals is this, how long will you continue to spin your wheels and waste time posting about her and keeping her relevant? Howard Dean went wacko and we conservatives just let him go off to looney land and he's now irrelevant. would you all be infatuated if she was a he? I think not.

homeagain wrote: When "celebrity" becomes the predominant adjective to describe her,the nation has a problem.JMO

Yeah, after all, the left was running around saying Reagan was just an actor shortly before he transformed the political landscape for the next 20 years too. Having the dominant left wing mass media portray her as a minor figure might be more of an indication of a problem within the left leaning mass media than with the nation.

Looks like a bunch would like for Palin to be irrelevant. But she still has a base.

akilina wrote: Yep her shortcomings has her raking in the dough and in a position to endorse someone. You should be so promising ha

Speaking as an INDY (and we KNOW that INDIES will play a very predominate role in this next election cycle)I would NEVER
vote for a candidate that she endorsed.....problem with credibility as I have already stated.JMO

akilina wrote: Looks like a bunch would like for Palin to be irrelevant. But she still has a base.

The more the left squeals and bashes her, the more she stays in the spotlight and draws crowds from anti-liberals.

homeagain wrote:

akilina wrote: Yep her shortcomings has her raking in the dough and in a position to endorse someone. You should be so promising ha

Speaking as an INDY (and we KNOW that INDIES will play a very predominate role in this next election cycle)I would NEVER
vote for a candidate that she endorsed.....problem with credibility as I have already stated.JMO

So you'll vote for Obama, regardless of his failures just because Palin endorses a Republican. Twisted logic at best.