This could be really bad for Cain.

Uh oh.... the big news now is the lawyer from one of the women was on CNN and they are going after Cain. He said Cain waived his confidentiality agreement and now the lady wants to come out and tell her side and clear her name and clear up the lies Cain is saying. They are fighting now to let her come out and tell her side of it. And the lawyer also said they wanted to clear up that it was NOT a severence package like Cain said but it was a settlement for sexual harassment charges. They are saying once a face comes out in this it will change everything. And she has already said she has had to move in with relatives as she is harrassed by the media staking out her home.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/investiga ... story.html

neptunechimney wrote:

SS109 wrote: [Unintendeded consequences? According to Rush, Cain had his biggest day fundraising ever. (And he didn't even need to host a $1000 plate dinner like Obama does.)

I just saw that. Heads must be exploding.

Whoever made the joke about how sex charges might attract Dems to Cain was right!! :rofl rofllol

OK, just a quick question. Since he has offended and scared off a lot of the lower and middle income with an original plan to hike their taxes, Latino votes, Black votes, some Christian votes, and now some womens groups are wanting this investigated....... which voters exactly is he going for?

Ladies.....How would you like this guy breathing on you? Gross!

[youtube:atljpi3i][/youtube:atljpi3i]

The Viking wrote: OK, just a quick question. Since he has offended and scared off a lot of the lower and middle income with an original plan to hike their taxes, Latino votes, Black votes, some Christian votes, and now some womens groups are wanting this investigated....... which voters exactly is he going for?

t

I do not have the impression that he is trying to craft a msg to target a demographic. I think it's more what you see is what you get.

neptunechimney wrote:

The Viking wrote: OK, just a quick question. Since he has offended and scared off a lot of the lower and middle income with an original plan to hike their taxes, Latino votes, Black votes, some Christian votes, and now some womens groups are wanting this investigated....... which voters exactly is he going for?

t

I do not have the impression that he is trying to craft a msg to target a demographic. I think it's more what you see is what you get.

Well, I do still like him as a person and I hope this goes away for him and is not true.

Ah...I think he has no chance whatsoever....So why even waste a second talking about the guy..He's a joke

chickaree wrote:

SS109 wrote:

Conservation Voice wrote:

SS109 wrote: Viking? Happy to be getting your news from the slanted Politico now?

And that would be different from getting your news from the slanted Fox News or PatriotUpdate, how?

Usually I get my info from the Economist and NPR, neither one known for endorsing Republicans.

Back on track, so far it looks like this story will blow over unless the women agree to be exposed and interviewed.

Can they? I thought part of the settlements were non-disclosure statements.

The agreements don't cover friends of those involved. They are free to talk about what their friend told them, what they witnessed, etc.

Lucky Luckhurst wrote: Ah...I think he has no chance whatsoever....So why even waste a second talking about the guy..He's a joke

Racist.

Dr Philban wrote:

Lucky Luckhurst wrote: Ah...I think he has no chance whatsoever....So why even waste a second talking about the guy..He's a joke

Racist.

My mom is black