U.S. Adds 120,000 New Jobs In Nov As Jobless Rate Falls 8.6%

02 Dec 2011 14:26 #41 by PrintSmith
True enough - the worst part of it though is that the metrics used to calculate the number changed around 2005 or 2006 so there is no way to compare the current numbers with historical ones to get an accurate sense of the numbers. As far as I know anyway, the Department of Labor hasn't applied the new metrics to the old numbers so that a comparison between then and now can be drawn for some odd reason............

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

02 Dec 2011 14:34 #42 by Reverend Revelant

LadyJazzer wrote: It didn't seem to bother any of you during the previous 8-year administration... Why now?


Because the economy wasn't in the sh*t-can.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Dec 2011 19:51 #43 by lionshead2010
Leave it to Rush to give you the real story:

Regime Manipulates Numbers to Get Unemployment Headline Under 9%

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2011/ ... ne_under_9

"It could be 8.9; it won't be 8.9, it will be '8.'" Well, it's 8.6, but it doesn't matter, it's eight; and predictably, the media's all over it, and that's the headline. You know, I got up this morning and I did the show prep routine and one of the first places I always go is Drudge and I saw it right there in red, and it's 8.6, and that's all it said, and I knew what it was. It's Friday, and I didn't need to know anything else. I knew that was the unemployment number, 8.6, and that's all anybody else is gonna hear. They're not gonna dig deep and find out how it happened. Some people have, some people are. There's a slight bit of reservation in certain sectors of the Drive-By Media. But most of the Drive-By Media is doing hosannas and hallelujah and merry...

Well, Happy Holidays. They don't do Merry Christmas in the media. But we're back, it's done, they got the headline: "Unemployment, 8.6%!" Now, the truth of the matter is -- and Bloomberg News even points out that the only way -- it's a corrupt number. It is a corrupt number. Folks, the number of people who have quit looking for work in the last few weeks is 315,000. Those are the people have thrown up their hands after 99 weeks or more of being unemployed; and they've said, "I'm quitting. I'm not looking." So they're not counted. Therefore, the universe of jobs available in the country is down by 315,000. That is the labor force participation rate. The labor force participation rate is a meager 64%. It fell to 64% from 64.2%. So the 0.2% drop equals 315,000 people leaving the workforce.


Bloomberg News is even reporting this means that more people left the workforce than got jobs. Now, stop and think of this. More people left the workforce than got jobs, and the unemployment rate goes down? We're dealing here with a serious form of corruption, manipulation of data; but, we all knew it was coming. After all, we're talking about the regime. We knew this was coming. We know the fact, we know the histoire, that no president's been reelected with an unemployment rate higher than 8%. So here we are 11 months away from the next election, voila! Heading into the Christmas, slash, holiday season, and we're at 8.6%, the 0.6 doesn't matter, we're at 8%. And the media is having orgasms out there, O-gasms.

If only Herman Cain could get the press to pull for him like this. Now it's rare that a certain poster can attribute the Big "O" to male interaction...but in this case it appears to be true. Friggin hilarious.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Dec 2011 19:55 #44 by archer
I wonder if he gets indigestion from those sour grapes.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Dec 2011 20:01 #45 by jf1acai
It is a shame that none of us can believe what we read or hear anymore.

Or, maybe we never could, and just didn't realize it.

Experience enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again - Jeanne Pincha-Tulley

Comprehensive is Latin for there is lots of bad stuff in it - Trey Gowdy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Dec 2011 20:01 #46 by LadyJazzer
"I think--Therefore I don't listen to Rush Limbaugh--OR Glenn Beck"

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

04 Dec 2011 20:05 #47 by jf1acai
Or anyone else.

Maybe that is why I sometimes read VL's posts...


I know he is always full of it, so it doesn't matter! :biggrin:

Experience enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again - Jeanne Pincha-Tulley

Comprehensive is Latin for there is lots of bad stuff in it - Trey Gowdy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.130 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+