Here's your "voter fraud"... (Can't win if they don't cheat)

LadyJazzer wrote: And if it's illegal, you will be arrested, and convicted...

Thanks for playing...

I certainly hope so. It'd be nice to see some morality sneak it's way back into politics.

LadyJazzer wrote: And if it's illegal, you will be arrested, and convicted...

Thanks for playing...

Unless you are a democrat, then this is what LJ will say about illegal activities....

:Whistle :Whistle :Whistle :Whistle :Whistle :Whistle

You're a liar... When Dems have gotten busted and convicted I have ALWAYS said "GOOD... They deserve it too."

Pity that the irrelevant ACORN phony videos didn't result in any criminal charges...because there was no illegal activity.

LadyJazzer\n

And if it's illegal, you will be arrested, and convicted...

Thanks for playing...[/quo

Like Obama's buddies?
Rezko?
Blagovich?
Corzine?

:Whistle Until he pardons you...

Like Bush's buddies:
Like Scooter Libby?
Jack Abramoff?
Randy “Duke” Cunningham?
Bob Ney?
David Safavian?

And by the way, if Corzine is found to have broken any laws, I hope they put him away for a long time. I think there's more there than meets the eye, and if he was playing fast-and-loose with other people's money, then I hope he goes down just like Bernie Madoff.....

Blago?... Good... Glad he got nailed. He was a slimebag...

Rezko?....(Tony Rezko To Appeal Conviction, 10 1/2 Year Sentence) - Good... Glad he got nailed. He was a slimebag...

Does the fact that they were Dems make any difference to me?... Nope... If they broke the law, convict them. Thanks for playing.

So much for the "LIE" that I give a pass to Dems....

...(Interesting point: NONE of these people have anything to do with voter-fraud or vote-suppression... do they...?) Deflect much?

LadyJazzer wrote:

pineinthegrass wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: Oh, how cute... The O'Keefe/Breitbart videos which the Colorado Attorney General ruled were phony because of the dishonest editing...

I do love it when you have nothing more than fake videos and lies in answer to a court conviction... Who knew?

Can you provide a link where the Colorado Attorney General (or anyone else) ruled the videos to be phony?

Why yes.... I can:

(NOTE: I meant to say CALIFORNIA Attorney General...not "COLORADO Attorney General"...so sue me.)

California Attorney General: Breitbart's ACORN tapes were "severely edited"


Brown Releases Report Detailing a Litany of Problems with ACORN, But No Criminality

Confusing California with Colorado is no big deal, just carelessness. But claiming the attorney general ruled the tapes to be phony is just not true.

Attorney general's do not make such rulings. Judges do, and this (the tapes) never went before a judge (I'm not saying it should of). The Calif attorney general determined the tapes were edited which is no surprise. They obtained the unedited versions and posted them on their website. The Calif attorney general determined there wasn't sufficient evidence to convict anyone based on the tapes. They never used the word "phony" or made any such ruling. You just made that part up.

Pity that the irrelevant ACORN phony videos didn't result in any criminal charges...because there was no illegal activity.

The tapes didn't result in criminal charges, but there was illegal activity at ACORN. As I posted before...


But even without those tapes, ACORN has been found involved in plenty of other wrong doings. Here's a few...

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/l ... ud26m.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/09/us/09embezzle.html

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/22/voter.fraud/

And here is a compilation of ACORN schenanigans...

http://rottenacorn.com/activityMap.html

"phony" is not a "legal term", is it...

They were fraudulent... (i.e., phony) ... Don't care much if you accept it or not. I guess it depends on what your definition of "phony" is.... The attribution was given, and I'll stand by my statement that the tapes were phony.

Was ACORN incompetent in some ways? You betcha...

LadyJazzer wrote: "phony" is not a "legal term", is it...

They were fraudulent... (i.e., phony) ... Don't care much if you accept it or not. I guess it depends on what your definition of "phony" is.... The attribution was given, and I'll stand by my statement that the tapes were phony.

Was ACORN incompetent in some ways? You betcha...

I think it is obvious to everyone that you will stand by anything that supports your pov.

"Don't confuse me with facts, my mind is made up."

Yes, I learned it from the Righties on this board....

Nothing compared to what Southern Democrats did to the black vote in the 1950's and 60's. Poll taxes, armed intimidation, killing notherners helping to register African-Americans.