Last Night's Debate & Newt

navycpo7 wrote:

plaidvillain wrote: Ok...so we know there's no such thing as a "fiscally conservative" Republican anymore (remember, deficits don't matter?). Now "social conservative" doesn't mean anything. What the hell does "conservative" mean anymore? Best I can tell its a new synonym for "hypocrite".

Clinton blah blah blah. Kennedy blah blah blah. Newt gobble gobble gobble...

Same thing that a non fiscally liberal means. You sit there with your head in the sand, talking your typical trash about how the republicans didn't do this or how they didn't do that. Yet when the democrats held Washington Hostage for 4 years straight, 2 of them with a democratic President, and they did nothing, not a damn thing but make things worse. Of course nothing has changed either, they inflat thier numbers, especially during an election year, but then the truth comes out and all we hear is excuses. The democrats did nothing for job improvement, did nothing to provide a balanced budget, did nothing for the economy, so they are no damn better they the rest. Right now none of them are worth 2 cents. Both Parties have not done a damn thing for this country. So keep your head in the sand and the way things are going, well it is a good thing elections are coming up Some of the worthless trash in DC can be thrown out.

Unfortunately in my opinion... just so we can put new worthless trash in office. Our Federal government has become a revolving trash can. And useful partisan idiots like Plaidvillain is part of the problem, and will never be part of the solution.

So, what we have now is a sanctimonious schmuck who doesn't believe in gay marriage but thinks open-marriage is OK... And the retarded "values voters" think it's OK because he apologized to the invisible being. Got it.

LadyJazzer wrote: So, what we have now is a sanctimonious schmuck who doesn't believe in gay marriage but thinks open-marriage is OK... And the retarded "values voters" think it's OK because he apologized to the invisible being. Got it.

Correct... and the left better watch out. Newt could wipe the floor with Obama in a debate.

LadyJazzer wrote: So, what we have now is a sanctimonious schmuck who doesn't believe in gay marriage but thinks open-marriage is OK...

vs. a sitting President who won't support gay marriage until after the election...

Why are the liberals complaining about the conversion of the Republican voters to their way of thinking concerning lax social issues? I thought that this was their goal. The liberals should be saying "Welcome, brother. We are glad you have seen the light."

Now that those issues are out of the way we can devote our time to voting Obama out of office.

I didn't think my post sounded like complaining...Gee, I thought you guys recognized "satire" by now.

Do you mean "sarcasm"?

Exit polls seem to say that Newt's attack on the press won him the South Carolina primary. So the voters were willing to ignore the repeated instances of infidelity?

Other exit polls said that because Newt is a good debator, he will have a better chance to defeat Obama. Personally I base very little of my decision about who I support based on how well they debate.

If Newt somehow does win in November, he will be the first former Speaker of the House to become President.

Yes, winning in South Carolina, given the religious conservative nature of the GOP electorate, is such a great determiner of the outcome of the general election.... (thank god...)

LadyJazzer wrote: Yes, winning in South Carolina, given the religious conservative nature of the GOP electorate, is such a great determiner of the outcome of the general election.... (thank god...)

Pun intended?
If Newt does win Florida, Mitt could be in severe trouble. But I am betting Mitt will do better with all those East coast snowbirds.